Practiced Spellcaster


log in or register to remove this ad



Is it overpowered?
I would say so. Its clearly more powerful than Spell Penetration for a multiclassed caster.
I think a +2 for the caster level would be better.

Vraister
 

comparison with spell penetration isn't the point.

spell penetration benefits a full-progression caster. practiced spellcaster doesn't.
 

I think comparison with Spell Penetration is a good point.
Practised Spellcaster gives in the best case twice the benefit of Spell Penetration plus longer range, longer duration, higher damage and the possibility to affect tougher foes.
Looks to me that Practised Spellcaster is a must have feat for a multiclassed caster and those feats are always a bit risky.
Tell me, wouldn't you want Practised Spellcaster when you are playing a something(4)/caster(x). I would definitely want it.

Vraister
 


I just looked at your homepage and you have a similar feat which give just a +2 to the effective caster level maybe you should change that to +4 :)

I have seen just one multiclassed caster. He is a fighter(4)/cleric(8) and he doesn't suck at all. The Practised Spellcaster feat would actually make him too powerful in my opinion.

Vraister
 



Remove ads

Top