Haven't had a chance to watch the Youtube links, so I can't remember exactly what's done with them, but generally the 60 minutes style is:
Take an issue going on, and tell the viewers about it, taking no "stand" one way or the other.
Interview key players in said issue, and let them respond to what the big questions are.
Then make no comment on the interview, just show the interview and let the viewers determine their own thoughts.
This does not describe the 60 minutes that I know and love.
60 Minutes has always used selective editing to strongly imply things that are not true, while technically sticking to the rules of fair journalism. They pretty much were the first to use the practice to such widespread success, though they have certainly been copied a lot since. Keep those videos in mind, anytime a news program talks about a controversial subject where you don't personally know much.
That's more like it.
The video above is still a typical example of the way 60 Minutes spreads FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt), with very little concern for journalistic integrity. The formula works. They get viewers.
I wonder what a 60 Minutes investigation on D&D would look like today...