neceros
Adventurer
supporting Pathfinder with a new version of Tome of Horrors.
No. No, no, no, no, no!
supporting Pathfinder with a new version of Tome of Horrors.
I'm glad there's discussion.
I've been wondering if Clark was still interested.
At the ENnie awards 3 or 4? years ago, one of the Necro bigwigs, (sorry don't remember who) said they were working on Tome 4. As we haven't seen that in 3.5 version yet, I'm guessing those monsters will be part of any Pathfinder book.
Which is cool!
That was Bill, and I believe Casey was on stage with him. Been a few years, but I am pretty sure it was those two.
As the guy who actually came up with the title "Tome of Horrors", it pains me to say this, but yeah, I agree with Joe. Necromancer isn't really necessary, truth be told. Hire Scott Greene to write it, sure, but Necromancer just can't really compete with Paizo in terms of quality of presentation.As most of the best monsters (all from the first book and many from previous books) are already OGC, I don't see the benefit Paizo would get from waiting for Necromancer do to such a book.
As the guy who actually came up with the title "Tome of Horrors", it pains me to say this, but yeah, I agree with Joe. Necromancer isn't really necessary, truth be told. Hire Scott Greene to write it, sure, but Necromancer just can't really compete with Paizo in terms of quality of presentation.
I beg to differ. Overly rich, intricate, graphic-laden type of presentation does not work always work well with type of book content.
As an owner of original Creature Collection and comparing it against latest Bestiary Preview, I'd like to say that while both layouts have their merits, reading Creature Collection is much faster [1].
Black test on white, clear and correct layout, classic fonts - that's what I would expect from a book with a lot of crunch.
Regards,
Ruemere
[1] Paizo's stablocks are much better than those of CC, but there is quite a length of time difference between them.