I guess New Zealand is a bit more liberal than the mid west. My group was 50% female in 1996 and I had a gay player 1999/2000. I kind of look at both sides though. Is it reasonable for gays to get married? Sure why not. Is it reasonable for them to get married in say a Catholic Church maybe not as you are forcing your beliefs onto them (example only I am not Catholic or a fan of organized religions in general). There is an element of physics (every action has an opposite reaction)here the harder you push there will be a counter push, if things happen a bit more organically it creates less problems IMHO. Its entirely possible to score an own goal. It just dpeends on if those things blow up into violence or not (read a history book).
Generally you should not force your beliefs onto someone else (except things like no murder, child abuse etc). There are some things I don't want to see or expect to act out but I try to challenge myself sometimes, I liked season one of Sense8 for example season 2 not as much.
Maybe I'm odd, agnostic IRL but like clerics in D&D.
I think my point was that for all of this
talk about what people are going to include or not include in D&D, as a player and as a DM, I still prefer the tried and true:
Because I said so.
Noone is injecting a culture war into D&D by including, or really not including anything else when their argument is "This is the way it is." That was my point in using the "Don't start none..." line.
If someone includes the Blessing simply because they think it should exist in their game, regardless of if it is
every elf, a few elves, half the elves, or whatever there is nothing political about its inclusion. The DM has simply decided that sex-switching elves are something that exist in their world. No more than if they decided that they don't or that anything else does or doesn't exist. This falls into the "Don't start none."
Conversely, if elements are being included, or excluded on the basis of IRL cultural issues, then that is by definition "Starting something". The DM is injecting their politics into the game not by the nature of the elements they are including or excluding, but by the nature of
why they are including or excluding those elements.
It's one of the reasons I took such a strong objection to [MENTION=6689464]MoonSong[/MENTION] here.