I think there is no need for the destinction, because you can always find a case of racism that is worse than the one you just provided. That does not make the case you sited less important. How about we just oppose ALL racism?
Surely we agree that all crime is also bad? You don't need to make a distinction in the types of crime to be against all crime. And sure, a mass shooting is statistically worse than one guy getting shot, but they are both equally bad in my view.
No distinction because they're all equally bad?
So you would just have the anti-discrimination team roll a die to see what they tackle first: (1-2) go after the officers planting evidence on minorities to bump up their arrest stats, (3-4) go after the bank who is denying loans based on race, or (5-6) go after the person who picks minority contractors to work on their house because they say their tired of wondering if the white ones will be racist.
Or three calls come in to 911. Roll a die to see what they go deal with: (1-2) a shooting in progress at a local school, (3-4) a robbery last night that was just discovered, or (5-6) some kids in a pool who may or not have families that live in the complex but they don't look like they belong.
Or do I misunderstand what equally bad means?