Recent content by BlueFin

This is the thinking that I am flummoxed by, and I don’t mean that disrespectfully in any way. But I am flummoxed precisely because the events in January WAS them doing it again!

LOL, well, pathetic is as pathetic does. 😆 And yes, yes, I know, it’s too long for you to manage and comprehend.

LOL. So the best you can do is throw out an opinion and not do anything to back it up when challenged. And because you couldn’t backup your own opinion the best you could do was accuse someone of doing some they didn’t do. I think I know you quite well now. Short enough for you? 😆

No, I did not "point that out". Please take the time to read my post accurately. I pre-empted someone else trying to make that point in response to what I presented as my interpretation. If you read my post fully you would have read that I believe strengthening OGL 1.0a would go a long way...

And I would likely be willing to believe that interpretation …. were it not for the fact that this isn't wotc’s first rodeo - they have a history of behaviour that is contrary to the interpretation you have presented, and as I continue to say, their current behaviour continues to be, in my...

My interpretation, based on many of the comments I've read, is that most people are easing up on wotc and giving them the benefit of the doubt (now that those people have got what they want ie. OGL 1.0a left alone and the 5.1 SRD put into CC), at a time in which I believe wotc are still being...

This is just plain false. You had only made two comments in reply to me (unless I've missed one? But I do try to be careful in that regard). So as far as I am aware the only comment from you that might be you "trying to disengange" is this, and lo and behold, I did indeed quote it - (Edit...

That's all cool, and I essentially agree with you, but a few points ... You're quoting a post of mine that was a direct response to something said by @Justice and Rule. They said "It really feels like a lot of people want to avoid the whole "intent" question ...". By extension I was agreeing...

I would also like to point out that 1+3 is tacos, and I will not accept any other definition of 1+3. 🤣 Because tacos are great. 😍

I have nothing to offer except I just love those pictures ... such fond memories. Time to pull out the red box for a flick through 😍

Thank you, a perfect way to describe it. The whole "intent" question is one of those "inconvenient truths" and it's easier just to try to ignore it. Unfortunately I think those that don't want to ignore it seem to be in the definite minority now. People think they have the outcome they want...

What a bizarre response. Yet another where, it appears, someone hasn’t taken the time to actually read what I wrote and makes a comment that has nothing to do with it. I was merely responding to a bunch of people who have done exactly what you have done, but there was nothing “miserable” in my...

I totally believed you and can totally understand, it was rather long post. And I was genuinely appreciative of the fact that you didn’t just read a little bit, pick a single statement, and comment on it out of context. 🙏

So, nothing to offer in relation to your response to my post. What a surprise. 🤷‍♂️ And seeing as this statement appears to be trying to suggest I "take a view of the world that always puts me in opposition to those who are out to get me", you clearly didn't read my whole post. But that...