Recent content by CHEMISTSDP

I just received an update email today regarding the Combat Survey. At the top of the email was this picture: This is the first time that I have seen these covers. Does anyone have any thoughts about them? My initial impression is that I love the Monster Menagerie cover (what I can see of it)...

Sorry - after you replied to this I noticed that this topic is strangely in the Pathfinder forum. It was not my intention to take the discussion away from Paizo's games.

As someone that researches Greyhawk, this is truly an amazing thread. On Page 2 of this thread, there is a list of the Living Greyhawk Web Articles that used to be on the WOTC website. I have been searching for the article regarding Pelgaryn. Does anyone know if these articles are archived...

Personally, beyond needed monsters and named NPC's (both great suggestions) here are a few other things I wish they did more consistently in adventures: 1. I miss having the old-school jackets with the maps printed on the inside or a book of maps that is separate from maps being printed on the...

We are early enough in this edition that can definitely support weekly UA. I am very interested to see other areas that they flesh out. I am always interested in new Feats, Spells, and combat manuever options for example. To me, this is great news!

I think this is an excellent articulation of the differentiation of the Perception/Investigation dichotomy. Well said!

I agree with several Posters such as Jester David that I care about canon when it comes to the publisher maintaining canon continuity. I personally do not like a lot of crossover between gaming worlds (no Elminster in Greyhawk or Mordenkainen in FR). When I read source books and come across...