Recent content by ECMO3

Eh probably the flying castle in Tyranny of Dragons.

I like the build, the only thing I think you might run into issues with is it is bonus action heavy. I also prefer a heavy crossbow for a ranged weapon on this type of build. Back it up with dagger. At level 7 that would look like Truestrike-Crossbow, Dagger, nick-dagger, you lose the...

I am with you on this. I saw all the D&D movies and HAT is the only one that actually feels like an adventure. They almost made parts of it a bit cheesy in that way. It also may be part of why it wasn't a big hit and in fact underperformed.

The first time I did not cut it out, I linked the entire post. I cut it out and qouted it so you could explain the context to us. You did as a point of fact say it, and you can't articulate any other context you meant it in. If it is out of context why can't you explain for us what the...

My pick would be Undying Warlock with Agonizing Truestrike.

Yes I do. In fact it is a reply to something I said where you quoted me, and I what I am claiming is not out of your intended context when you wrote it. If it is out of context, explain what context we are supposed to take it in when you say: "It is RAW, though, that the hit that brings you...

I'm sorry, I am not complaining and did not intend for it to come across like that. I don't think any Rogue or Ranger or really any class can 1v1 a Noble Prodigy at level 9 with a good chance of success. If I was going to try I would probably do a Bladesinger with Mage Slayer feat, but that...

This is what I don't like about a Paladin, they really emphasize the martial side of the character. I think if you want an Archer you should play a Fighter. Not saying you can't do it with a Paladin or a Ranger, but that just doesn't feel like what those classes should be about to me. I am...

I play more Fey Wanderers than any other subclass, I don't think you should be picking this subclass if you are building for a DPR character. A Fey Wanderer is really a controller first with ok but not great martial abilities that you can contribute with. If we are talking about a 1V1 here...

As a player multiclassing is probably my favorite part of 5E compared to older editions. I certainly don't want it any more restrictive than it is and I think it is a huge improvement over 3E where you lost experience if there was a split. TBH what I would really like is to do away with the...

Ok. It works for me.

Well there are a lot of rules not reprinted, including a lot of content that is not player facing. For example - gritty realism, optional rules for shove aside and tumbling through opponents.

Yes I was. Again the last line in thew following linked post. You can keep denying, but it is right there if you click on the post, and it is in context. https://www.enworld.org/threads/is-5e-better-because-of-crawford-and-perkins-leaving.716340/post-9813594 You just refuse to admit you were...

We play mixed games all the time. The key to this is do not use anything from 2014 that was reprinted, but feel free to use everything that was not reprinted. So use the 2014 version of Cause Fear and the 2024 version of Tasha's Hideous Laughter. Don't use the 2014 classes, but you can use...

The point is, if you play that subclass it is certainly not underpowered. Well it is not once a turn and does not even use a reaction and you need to see him to cast magic missile. An 18th level Monk with a 10 Constitution has 93 hit points. Assuming you have a way of seeing invisible, and...