FrogReaver's latest activity

100% this. People don’t design warlords for 5e as it currently exists. They design warlords for 5e as the wish 5e existed. You can...

@I'm A Banana Your idea of Martial exploits look a lot like manouvers and stances from 3.5e Bo9S. Not magic per se, but bordering...

In the tradition of warlord conversations not being about the warlord, this is a conversation about why 5e might be reluctant to...

I’m a reformed monster. Until about a week ago mine was set to 10 posts per page.

Page 19. What sort of monster doesn’t set the “posts per page” value to maximum? Do you like having to load pages more often??? :)

I never, ever said it was impossible in general. I said it was impossible if it must be shackled to the Fighter as a subclass. That's...

5e isn't granular enough to do it. The 4e warlord works because 4e was built on stacking micro bonuses and grid movement. 5e is not...

I agree the fighter chassis is a bad basis. Yet, anytime I’ve seen anyone produce a balanced warlord it gets shouted down by warlord...

It most certainly is about pure personal performance, though. Because in order to do what you describe, you must do one of two things...

And responses like this are why people object. No, they are Warlord equivalents. You might not like the mechanics. You can say that...

Do what I did one time. Keep track of how much damage was enabled by the bard and count it as your damage. One session approximately...

From where I sit most 4e warlord fans won’t be satisfied unless they have a very overturned warlord class. One that does the damage of...

Sure. I’m just saying that’s the too much spot.

No they don’t! :p

In my experience, players and GMs are far more likely to do that than rules.