Recent content by Raiztt

People may hate them, but the pruning of attacks of opportunity caused a lot of problems IMO.

That's understandable from a marketing/selling perspective. Frankly if wizard is going to be the most powerful class (and I'm not saying it is, I'm just saying IF) then the class itself should have a higher skill ceiling. I realize this principle is also antithetical to the above principle, but...

Cantrips should not be at-will. Imagine telling a B/X wizard that they have infinite weightless torch.

and half of the D&D community has an answer for you: A character is capable of doing what a human can do.

Again, at no point in the last 24 hours have I been talking to you, or even about the same thing as you. I literally do not know what you're on about. I made a one-off statement about how if D&D was separated into two different 'tiers' it would calm down internet debates (probably not true) but...

I have no idea what you're talking about or what this has to do with whether or not these types of discussions that matter to us matter to the people who make the game.

No but that's what I'm saying, it ISN'T an answer to his question. They aren't asking why the writer wrote what they wrote, he is asking assuming that world is real, what is the explanation? In this world is it possible for things to just "happen" for literally no reason? If so/not so, what are...

You believe that even 10% of D&D players participate in online forums...?

It would obviously solve a lot of internet debates, but I don't think we all here collectively represent a large enough demographic for these concerns to ever matter to corporate.

This is not a sufficient explanation for the person you're responding to because it's not an in-world explanation.

Agreed, "supernatural" doesn't pick out anything discrete.

Barring an explanation, a druid SHOULD be able to turn into a dragon. There would need to be some sort of metaphysical law (rather than a physical law) that explains why druid's have this limitation. What I was talking about is completely beside the issue of D&D. There is a very real and very...

1.) I'm ok with magic being, fundamentally, a power/source that is beyond that of mundane/mortal beings. That makes sense to me. If something is not bound by the physical laws, it's going to be more powerful than those laws. 2.) Barring the above, I'm already on the record saying the game should...

The conclusion of an argument isn't circular, only the entire argument. Also, the argument isn't circular. 1.) anything that exists is "natural" 2.) magic exists C.) magic is natural. The point is that natural vs. supernatural only has arbitrary distinctions. If I could do magic in real life...

I use they/them frequently to refer to anyone, every day of my life in every situation.