Recent content by Senshi-shi

Thanks to all of the people who spoke up, due to the criticism and support i have a better idea of what others in the comunity think and how to procede with this if I end up trying to implement this in a campaign. Also sorry if I seem like a anoyance and was unclear in my thoughts on the subect.

obviously not.

ok ive said alot and only a couple people voice their opinion which is only a small amount of the people voting. I do like the idea of being able to use everything in a class, but i cant think of a way around that. I'm not on this cite to just hear what is wrong with my ideas i'm here to learn...

You are close to the idea but very far. Each class is leveled up separate depending on how you want to make your character as he levels up, like how a lv12 human can be lv8 druid, and a lv4 monk. What I'm getting at is the same concept, but you only get the basic features once. Ok so you said 3...

If it caused harm or is a hindrance to the focus, like thorn whip does damage, but (and here's the techy part.) Create water makes water. It all depends on how they are used. The vine whip can be attached to a high branch and be considered a rope, thusly not an attack. Create water can appear...

Think about it this way. If you are the DM think does what this player is saying inspire allies, does it insult the enemy, and can he cast another spell. Answers. Likely, possably, highly unlikely. Talking is a 'free' action, but they only have 6 second turns so what is said should have to be...

that came up before and no thats not what mastery means to us. like as a rouge you can be a top assassin, but you can't be a top thief. This is what we call mastery not just halfway

In the PHB it said you can't pick the same class twice. But what if someone wanted to totally master a class. This discussion took place between me and four other local DM's that our high school uses. In the end, we ended up with no solutions only to end up where we started. Yet I still can't...