Recent content by SkidAce

I think I might change my title to "Atypical Grognard".

Just to remind you, there are folks (like me) who respect your opinion and are not calling you wrong. I asked a question about a human centric campaign and you answered. Respect. At the very ultimate worst my opinion is "What a shame, I bet we would have had fun in a game together otherwise"...

DM: "Cool, cultists summoning elementals, or giants and monstrosities it is! Sweet, lets roll those characters up"

They can push that idea all they want. I'll ignore it.

"yoink"

Maybe I should have finished reading the thread before replying, was not intending on belaboring a point, is/was honest question.

This is the way.

If you knew ahead of time, would you have played in my all human campaign, where the goal was to highlight the class and things you learned in character, as opposed to what you "were"? It was planed for a year and lasted about 14 months, up to 10th level.

Christmas present... Dice Spinner

Feat: Misty Step as a bonus action (once per turn) [equivalentish to dash as a bonus action]. Sneak attack after Misty Step does extra 1d6 damage.

Polyhedron had some I think.

Yea, not much talk about "Monty Haul" anymore. In a weird backwards way it kinda makes me nostalgic....mix it with munchkin gaming and what a blast.../shakes head laughing. And I ADORE Champions/Hero...but my players now adays are math averse...so...

The community is also built off of decades of normal people being the DM and providing fair and fun play. Ultimately what we are discussing is opinions based upon personal experience and anecdotal viewpoints.

While I think the play styles for DnD were more varied and somewhat less adversarial than folks propose (this is anecdotal on both sides though)... Your "Controversial Opinion"? I ran into that several times and being younger, I assumed WoD was like that and bounced off hard.

--double post--