http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?130652-Merlin%92s-Workshop-Classically-Modern-1-0-is-complete
It's conversion of 3.5 characters to d20 modern. When my GM wanted to convert our D&D characters, I realized that there's no direct conversion for high-level core casters. A fair number...
Anyone know where I can find Classically Modern for 3.5/d20 Modern? I've been searching and searching but all roads I've found lead to inactive websites.
Dragon Index Update
Here's a few dragon references to add to the list:
Adamantine Dragon—Monstrous Compendium Outer Planes Appendix
Air Dragon—Realmspace
Brown Dragon—Old Empires (unverified)
Amber/Brown/Tiger's Eye Dragon—Rules Cyclopedia (I haven't verified that this dragon is referred as...
I ran across that site, and it's quite nice. However, a few of the references are incorrect, and some are missing. Among the ones I noticed were the dragons that were listed as being in Dragon #128. They're actually in Dragon #134. And it doesn't list that Bahamut and Tiamat are in the 3e...
It's quite interesting what I found when I started looking for dragons. Just like there's two kinds of jade dragons and two kinds of radiant dragons. There's good number more dragon kinds with the same name. I've made a list of all the ones I could find including the ones that were already...
Happy to amuse.
A couple more things.
There's two Monstrous Compendium Spelljammer Appendices (2109 MC7 and 2119 MC9). The moon, stellar, and sun dragons are in the second appendix (2119 MC9). Took me a while to figure this one out, because neither appendix is listed as "Appendix I" nor...
Great thread. About time for a small update: the arcane dragons in Dragon #343.
Hex Dragon
Tome Dragon
Also, can anyone give sources for other versions/editions/reprintings of these dragons, not just the latest edition? For instance, the adamantine dragon was in 2nd Edition in the Monstrous...
Nope. The ability description is that descriptive text following the ability name. The spell description is that formatted descriptive text following a spell name. It's just that simple.
Two words can make all the difference, especially in a language where the mere placement of...
Again, I disagree. I've noticed that the rules avoid implying anything in order to cut down on confusion. They usually either include all the relevant information right there or refer the reader elsewhere for the full details. The amount of space required for the phrase "or spell" would not...