• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 5E DM Help! My rogue always spams Hide as a bonus action, and i cant target him!

seebs

Adventurer
So I guess I'd say: The halfling could conceivably get the drop on the orc because the orc stopped paying attention and isn't actively watching the box. If we drop back out of combat-rounds because nothing's happening? Sure.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

If that was true then a halfling or elf would not be able to hide while observed by using their racial abilities yet a Sage advice confirmed it http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/rules-answers-november-2015


Do the lightfoot halfling and wood elf hiding racial traits allow them to hide while observed? The lightfoot halfling and wood elf traits—Naturally Stealthy and Mask of the Wild—do allow members of those subraces to try to hide in their special circumstances even when observers are nearby. Normally, you can’t hide from someone if you’re in full view. A lightfoot halfling, though, can try to vanish behind a creature that is at least one size larger, and a wood elf can try to hide simply by being in heavy rain, mist, falling snow, foliage, or similar natural phenomena. It’s as if nature itself cloaks a wood elf from prying eyes—even eyes staring right at the elf! Both subraces are capable of hiding in situations unavailable to most other creatures, but neither subrace’s hiding attempt is assured of success; a Dexterity (Stealth) check is required as normal, and an observant foe might later spot a hidden halfling or elf: “I see you behind that guard, you tricksy halfling!”

I've weighed out of this discussion (getting sick of repeating myself and really, everyone is entitled to the interpretation that works for them) but you might want to re-read the advice you quoted.

Nowhere does it say those races can attempt to hide while being observed. It says you can attempt when observers are 'nearby', and you stay hidden thereafter even if they look straight at you.

It was intentionally written vague to support both interpretations (gamist/ RAW vs simulationist/ common sense) of hiding.
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
I've weighed out of this discussion (getting sick of repeating myself and really, everyone is entitled to the interpretation that works for them) but you might want to re-read the advice you quoted.

Nowhere does it say those races can attempt to hide while being observed. It says you can attempt when observers are 'nearby', and you stay hidden thereafter even if they look straight at you.

It was intentionally written vague to support both interpretations (gamist/ RAW vs simulationist/ common sense) of hiding.

"and a wood elf can try to hide simply by being in heavy rain, mist, falling snow, foliage, or similar natural phenomena. It’s as if nature itself cloaks a wood elf from prying eyes—even eyes staring right at the elf!"

It says right there clear as day that you can try to hide while being stared at. So yes, it does say they can attempt to hide while being observed.

 

Plaguescarred

D&D Playtester for WoTC since 2012
I've weighed out of this discussion (getting sick of repeating myself and really, everyone is entitled to the interpretation that works for them) but you might want to re-read the advice you quoted.

Nowhere does it say those races can attempt to hide while being observed. It says you can attempt when observers are 'nearby', and you stay hidden thereafter even if they look straight at you.

It was intentionally written vague to support both interpretations (gamist/ RAW vs simulationist/ common sense) of hiding.
The question specifically ask if they can hide while observed and the answer doesn't specifically refute it. It on the contrary say it can be done even when eyes are staring right at them. Normally you can't hide from someone if you're in full view. A lightfoot halfling though, can try. And a wood elf can try to hide too. It says so right in the answer!
 

So your argument is that English isn't English, so that "staring right at the elf" means in your invented English that the observer isn't actually observing the elf?

Sorry, but I'm going to go with the real English meaning of "staring right at the elf", and go with........he's STARING RIGHT AT THE ELF. Staring at something is not looking in the direction of that thing. It's looking directly at something extremely intently to the point of not blinking or looking away from it.

He is staring at the Elf. [After] the Elf hides.

And hiding while under observation is something the Elf cant do, while being stared at.

It's just now [Elf hidden behind small bush, yet still totally visible] he wont see the elf even if he's looking right at him.

Example:

An Elf walks into room containing nothing but a 2 and a half foot tall potted ficus. Even though the ficus only provides light obscurement, he decides to hide behind the ficus. He rolls well [An 18]. An Orc [passive perception 12] walks into the room and stares directly at the ficus (and the Elf).

Despite staring straight at the Elf, the Orc cant see the Elf.

Now, if the Elf were a Human [and not an Elf], the Orc would instead see this:

man_hiding_behind_plant_in_office_1801150.jpg

In the Elfs case, the Orc instead sees this:

stock-photo-green-plant-in-a-clay-pot-decorating-the-corner-of-a-room-with-a-glass-door-14173891.jpg

Elf magic is cool.
 
Last edited:

The question specifically ask if they can hide while observed and the answer doesn't specifically refute it. It on the contrary say it can be done even when eyes are staring right at them. Normally you can't hide from someone if you're in full view. A lightfoot halfling though, can try. And a wood elf can try to hide too. It says so right in the answer!

No, the answer is written (intentionally I strongly suspect; they still havent provided a definitive answer one way or the other) to support both interpretations; the gamist one and the simulationist one.

See above for reasons.
 

It says right there clear as day that you can try to hide while being stared at. So yes, it does say they can attempt to hide while being observed.

No, it doesn't. It says once hidden they cant be seen by observers (with a lower perception than the Elfs stealth result) despite still being visible. Its intentionally written to support both interpretations.

Observe:

A wood elf can try to hide simply by being in heavy rain, mist, falling snow, foliage, or similar natural phenomena.

Elf [in natural phenomena with no-one watching] is allowed to take the Hide action ['try to hide']. Succeeds and rolls higher than passive perception of dudes nearby.

Dudes nearby now turn and look directly at the Elf.

It’s as if nature itself cloaks a wood elf from prying eyes—even eyes staring right at the elf!"

Dudes
see nothing, despite the Elf being clearly visible.
 

Plaguescarred

D&D Playtester for WoTC since 2012
No, the answer is written (intentionally I strongly suspect; they still havent provided a definitive answer one way or the other) to support both interpretations; the gamist one and the simulationist one.

See above for reasons.
No the answer is clear enought it's just that some simulationist have a hard time accepting it i believe.

If you're not in vull view you're not seen clearly and thus everyone can hide. Normally you can't hide from someone in full view. These features THOUGH let you try to hide while in full view.

Though means despite the fact, even if , howerever.... http://www.thefreedictionary.com/though

So even if, however, despite the fact that they're in full view (and normally can't hide) they can try to hide...

Normally, you can’t hide from someone if you’re in full view. A lightfoot halfling, though, can try to vanish behind a creature that is at least one size larger, and a wood elf can try to hide simply by being in heavy rain, mist, falling snow, foliage, or similar natural phenomena.


 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
No, it doesn't. It says once hidden they cant be seen by observers (with a lower perception than the Elfs stealth result) despite still being visible. Its intentionally written to support both interpretations.

Observe:

A wood elf can try to hide simply by being in heavy rain, mist, falling snow, foliage, or similar natural phenomena.

Elf [in natural phenomena with no-one watching] is allowed to take the Hide action ['try to hide']. Succeeds and rolls higher than passive perception of dudes nearby.

Dudes nearby now turn and look directly at the Elf.

It’s as if nature itself cloaks a wood elf from prying eyes—even eyes staring right at the elf!"

Dudes
see nothing, despite the Elf being clearly visible.
Try to hide =/= already hidden. It means that you are not hidden and TRY TO HIDE. You are trying to force that statement to fit your pre-conceived ideas on hiding, when it clearly doesn't.

If someone is not observed he can NEVER try to hide, as hiding will ALWAYS be successful. Staying hidden vs. perception is another matter entirely, but when unobserved the roll is not to try to hide, it is to see how well you successfully hid. You can only ever TRY to hide while being observed.
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
No the answer is clear enought it's just that some simulationist have a hard time accepting it i believe.

For the record, I'm primarily simulationist and I understand it just fine. [MENTION=6787503]Hriston[/MENTION] and [MENTION=6788736]Flamestrike[/MENTION] are trying to twist that statement to fit their narrative of how hiding works. Hriston is trying to argue that you don't directly observe something you are staring directly at, and Flamestrike is trying to divorce the second sentence from the first when they are clearly tied together by how they are written. Both are failing badly.
 

Remove ads

Top