Search results

Sorry its like that, I just have a particular dislike when I belive that I am being told to what to say or what to think. I could be nce and simply lie about things so everything is "political correct" but I rather give my personal honest opinion on things, I might be wrong (and I had been...

Oh really? I dont thank people from doing their paid jobs because they get paid ... monetary compensation for their work. Call it rude if you want, fact is I dont give a damn about what people think of my opinions ... they asked them, they get then. WizOs get paid, its their job to moderate...

None, not now and not ever. Not downloading the SRD either ...

PAID jobs, I might add ... I dont "thank" anyone for doing his PAID job. I can say I posted there for a long time and I was a heavy poster during WizO_Jedi days was lead. The boards were pretty decent back then, sure there was the ocasional troll and flame war but things moved along and their...

2nd ed rangers were "broken" because 2 weapon fighting itself was broken in 2nd ed. Also remenber that rangers in 2nd ed had aligment restriction and lets not forget that XP tables were diferent for each class. Problem we have with this is that it does not makes the ranger a viable choise...

None. I am already involved in 3 campain settings, each significantly diferent of the others. I might had checked DragonLance but since its revised 3rd edion from the start I no longer have any intresse on it or anything that is revised 3rd edition.

Worst edition ever ...

Me too, its 3rd edition or nothing. At least the nerfing of spells will make my group more resistent to change to the "revised" or I would have to quit.

Well you can add to the fact some PHB classes sould not be in OA style adventures (on top of my head, the Wizards, Bard and if not mistaken the Cleric).

"What's wrong with giving a roleplaying disadvantage to compensate for a mechanical advantage?" The bladesinger kit show exactly what is wrong with that ...

Hurray for the nerfing .... Still its not nerfed enough, I the the "NPC classes" sould be made standart (after being nerfed of course) and the now PC classes removed and monsters sould be powered up and nobody would be able to raise above lv10.

That because gnomes are supposed to be bards. ... (sorry, could not resist)

Sembia itself was barely descrived during 2nd ed, reason was that originaly it was given to LRPG (or something similar) to be developed. When they did do something about it, it was in the revised campain box set (and its bare bones development) and it upset the players that mde up the Great...

Wlecome to 4th edition .... Of what? I am not sure .... it sure looks less and less D&D ...

shameless plug Hey Bob Fitch, any chance of having Starcraft 2 added to that list? /smaless plug

In the human side the elves are clerics. In the night elves side you have priestress of the moon, druids of the talon and the druids of the claw.

Lets see ... can you use D&DG as it written in 3.5? MotP? Can you run WotC 3.0 adventure modules in 3.5 without having to correct all NPCs stats? They altered the pit fiend so much that any adventures that featured a pit fiend have to be re-evaluated, meaning that only thing that is left is...

Err, in WC3 clerics are elves ...

Depends ... If you are a designer that like to do things in a certain way and then development goes in a way you dont like you can either stay and see things go in a direction you do not like or make plans to move someplace that fits into the way you like doing things. And remenber that WotC...

WotC laid off all those people because ... err ... they were professionals and would have quit anyway because WotC magerment appears to be like TSR? I rather work for White Wolf that WotC/Hasbro ...