Search results

I would happily play 2E again but if I were DMing it would turn out to be some ghastly hybridization of 1e, 2e and 3e. What to like about 2E: character classes are somewhat more filled out and playable than their 1e versions; lots of materials available for further customization; psionics...

Most of the ideas above are good ones. The wizard class should give a different play style/experience compared to other full casters, as different from cleric/druid/sorcerer/bard as warlock is from all the rest. Making their spells more powerful, but also take longer to cast and interruptible...

The tier system was one of Shadowrun's nicer innovations. I ran a short D&D game using a tier system for character creation (point buy, starting level, starting wealth and a couple of other categories I forget). That wouldn't work for a long campaign though. I'm not sure it could be adapted as a...

I think we're overdue for a modern d20 Modern, and reimagine the six "smart, strong, etc." classes without any spellcasting.

If all sorcerers have an innate gift, then why force them to be charismatic? There are too many Cha casters already and too much cheesy synergy among them. Here's a wild idea: Sorcerers have magic without any primary spellcasting stat. Their spell DCs and spell attack rolls IN THEIR THEME get...

Free your mind; kill the 8 schools! What makes a wizard? Their training. In literature, the abilities of academic/hermetic magicians are often defined by their masters/schools. So your premise is good. The universal spells can be ones that either underly magic itself (detect magic, dispel...

For anyone who liked Tea With a Black Dragon, McAvoy wrote two really good, non-traditional, haunting, fantasy trilogies: Damiano - a monk summons an angel to teach him about music Lens of the World - an orphan raised in a military academy meets a philosopher/scientist and becomes something...

That was the first Dragon I bought! Ah nostalgia...

Thanks again for these enjoyable posts. This game is a lot longer than I remembered!

I'm really enjoying your writeups of the experience, thanks for all the time and effort you put into them!

I would cut down on the magic. 5 classes: Fighter (battlemaster) - but with simpler rules, like you have Xd6 per day that you can spend after an attack hits to add damage and a status effect. This covers the VERY common newbie requests like "I want to aim for its eyes" without begging the...

The OP's version is pretty good and I like tying it to a die that scales with level, similar to BM dice or bard dice. But I would like this iconic Ranger ability to: 1. Incentivize ranger-like behavior, such as stalking prey and studying the environment, and 1. Give more noncombat benefits...

I'm a bit late to the conversation but my ideal D&D has a large selection of non-spellcasting classes, which each support a different player style and way of interacting with the game. Some of these can have magical abilities or puch mundane feats to supernatural levels, but as icing on the cake...

So an equivalent Slaad Lord should do damage with maximum variance, such as d60 or d100 damage?

They should replace "Force" with "Ethereal" as a type of magic damage since traditionally such spells are rare and called out as affecting ghosts and creatures with an Ethereal presence. Physical attacks are magical or not--this is a binary flag. There is no advantage to unifiying the two.

I really like the World Tree barbarian but I agree with others that Groot fighting feels off. Regarding the "viking" cultural stamp, many other cultures/traditions have some version of an axis mundi that connects the material world to other worlds. It might not be a tree-it might be a river, a...

You're right that the rules are intentionally agnostic regarding the source and nature of magic. This makes it possible for individual DMs to impose their own cosmology, and if they so desire to modify details of the magic system to match the story. For example, if you are trying to emulate a...

I do my very best to be a good DM to casual players, even the ones who can't be bothered to read the PH. I just think they deserve something cooler (in name and abilities) than "evoker". The War Mage is 10x better.

I don't think the evoker has any identity. It's the boring subclass for casual players like the life cleric and the champion. DM: What kind of wizard do you want to be? Player: I dunno, someone who blasts things?

I'm bored with the eight schools and would like to see them go away entirely. There are too many spells whose classification is arbitrary or ambiguous. And I fully agree that many of the schools are too weak and/or too bland to support interesting subclasses We could replace the schools with a...