Search results

I am not sure if I want such things gated behind feats. But I'd like to see what you design there.

Although the intend is great, this would make for a vastly different game. Too much focus on combat. Too detailed. Would make a great combat simulation. So thank heaven's you are not in control of the core D&D game. I'd like to see how your game works out though.

I have seen the previews. Certainly nice. It is in the back of my head if the 2024 are not to my tastes. I have the German version of the tome of beasts. I have not used it yet. I was not disappointed with 5e's light monster design. Might be different if we play in person some time in the future.

Ok. Nothing to see here. A nice variant. Nothing ground breaking.

Yes, I agree. The paladin lvl 1 is no match for a fighter. No fighting style. only 5hp/LR instead of 1d10+1/short rest and more MADness.

Nooo.... i was trying to prove a point. Now Minigiant will point to your post and tell me that you propose the warlord to be just a subclass. :/ Other than that, I agree with your point. The warlord should be autonomly useful. This is why I propose adding more warlord abilities to the fighter...

Nope. No mention of subclass. Tray again.

The paladin provides 5hp per long rest...

I have gone through the first 13 pages of this thread and did not read a single post, that said: "the warlord should jsut be a fighter subclass". So can you point to one of those posts?

Sorry that I did not answer that. That is what I wish for.

Those numbers are really pulled out of your hat. Good thing: noone suggested a subclass in this thread.

Oh. Per short rest. Yes. That is too much.

Not really, but strongbow should be a fighter feature. Or a general longbow trait.

I'd say it is no science at all. More conspiration theory.

Where do those 90% come from? So anyone who disagrees (except for the 10%) are no true warlord fans? I was a warlord fan. I do disagree that the two expamples you gave warrant their own class. One even has fighting styles like the fighter (and the paladin and the ranger). Which could equally...

@CreamCloud0 Sorry that my posts made you sad.

I used english versions. I did not like the German translations back then.

I am from Germany and I was there around that area. I started playing in the mid 90s with AD&D and then converted readily to 3e where I started DMing. It was just that we had enough material to play forever without magazines in 2002. Maybe I have seen them, but I just did not need them. 3e spoke...

I really disagree with the assertion that there are no good rangers. After tashas ranger is a fine class that can do a lot of nice stuff. The variant abilities are powerful and thematic. The phb ranger is not bad either. It is just that their abilities are not well designed to play with each...

See. You are still talking about the battlemaster. That is not where I had started. It had started woth a redesign of the fighter. That really includes parts of the warlord. No, I have not seen homebrews in play.* Now please elaborate: how did the "princess" work with 4e warlord? It was...