Search results

  1. B

    "Math glitch" -- explanation or pointer?

    Not this again. Did everyone forget that WotC employes admited in interview that this feats are "temporary solution" to math problems? They just put it into game to see reaction of fans and now they are thinking about new way o fixing math (sic!)! Here, listen and stop asking this question over...
  2. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    The problem is that you can use CoWW whenever you want to significantly boost your hp. When the fight become hard *ping* +1/2hp and monster can "bite you". It's it potential that is in my opinion to good in fight (and can be used every encounter). I didn't said it should be banned. I converted...
  3. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    The problem lays not in daily item powers but with items that gives constant benefits becouse of they property. When you make a Daily item power that add +5 dmg to single damage roll and then you put an item that grants constant +2 bonus to dmg to every attack, what option is better? IAoP...
  4. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    Dwarven armor only heals 1/4 of you overall hp (once per extended rest), while CoWW give you +1/2 of overall hp every encounter. While you can argue that this is free action compared to standard, still standard and +1/2hp every fight is better than +1/4hp as free once per day... For dwarves it's...
  5. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    No, but dwarves have huge adventage when they use this item. CoWW give you ability to heal= 1/2 of your hp. And you can do it every encounter. It's standard action for many characters but still gaing +1/2 of your max hp with one standard action every encounter makes many fights not challenging...
  6. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    @brassbaboon I don't understand one "gold rule" about WotC. What they do isn't always well designed. We have plenty of such a individual examples: * Expertise feats - they said it's just temporary solution to fix the math * Epic Will, For, Ref - they didn't said it's solution but if expertise...
  7. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    @keterys Well, you make me think about banning all items that give straight dmg bonus (Armbands, Bracers of Archery - even those who add +2 with basic attacks only, Staff or Ruin - wizard shouldn't have such a boost to they area powers!, Radiant Weapon). Did I miss something?
  8. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    Actually this item can be used once per day. Look at the Whetstone entry in Adventurer's Vault. Try to look at the rules first before you make wrong assumptions.
  9. B

    The new, shiny "Stuff I Have/Would Ban" thread!

    @brassbaboon There are many items in arms slot. Why do I need to throw them all, becouse of few overpowered items? When I will ban Iron Armbads and similiar items (4 or so), then other arms slot items will be a fair choice. Better solution is to ban Armbands etc. and give players +2 to dmg at 6...
  10. B

    The new Battlerager - Clear as mud

    It also says that: "If you use an invigorating fighter attack power and miss every target with it, you gain temporary hit points equal to your Constitution modifier." Then the feat says: "You gain a +2 feat bonus to the number of temporary hit points you gain from using an invigorating power...
  11. B

    The new Battlerager - Clear as mud

    Shouldn't it be +8? +4 CON and +4 from feat? The feat description doesn't mention anything about being hit, but just about using invigorating power.
  12. B

    Moving into occupied square

    @Jhaelen Ok, I see this now. Thx.
  13. B

    Moving into occupied square

    "Enemy: You normally can’t move through an enemy’s space unless that enemy is helpless or two size categories larger or smaller than you. Moving into a nonhelpless enemy’s space provokes an opportunity attack from that enemy, because you left a square adjacent to the enemy. (Some powers let...
  14. B

    Stealth issue

    Yeah I know the rules about the Stealth, but have problem only with this issue. Thx a lot for help. That makes all clear to me.
  15. B

    Stealth issue

    Hi, I have little problem. This is the situation: It's 3rd round of combat. Enemy X is trying to hide with move action (and move only 2 sqr). He rolls 20 on Stealth check. Now I compare his result with Passive Perception of each player. The only person who has succed is elf ranger with 21...
  16. B

    Broken things errata'ed, July 2009

    Do I read it right? Invigorating powers temp HP stack with vigor temp?
  17. B

    poll on Expertise...Forked Thread: Expertise justification?

    +1. I completly agree with you.
  18. B

    Expertise justification?

    @GMforPowergamers What will happen if there isn't a Warlord in my party? What if we have cleric on WIS and CHA instead Are you saying that we need some powers that give us to hit bonuses or the game will be not fun-good-playable? Shouldn't the game be balanced for such a simple things like...
  19. B

    Expertise justification?

    Ok, if I were insulting sorry then. Didn't try to achive this. @GMforPowergamers You still don't get my point I think. This +3 to hit isn't there to make game playable but easier. This are diffrent things. Many DMs offten use higher level monsters and think that makes game more challanging...
  20. B

    Expertise justification?

    Firstly I didn't insult you. Just state that you ignore many facts. Secondly you can win almost all the fights on higher level. My team won a n+6 fight one day. So what? It was the most not enjoying fight I ever played. You see. Many DMs think that making such a fight makes game better and more...
Top