Search results

Yeah, it can probably sell well, especially with a show like Stranger Things basically being a promotion for it. ;)

I am one of those who wanted smaller adventures. But yeah, I was not hoping for a re-hash of old ideas. It makes reading the adventures more work than pleasure, and it's less likely that I will buy them. I was hoping for something more modern, like Reavers of Harkenworld, which I think is the...

If you are hidden, then you have surprised everyone and the only one who can act in the first round.

The title really doesn't say much, neither does your post. Is there a question there?

There is one subscription for Pathfinder and one for D&D 5e

That's a really good errata in my opinion. They only clarified what they ment by the initial text, but didn't state explicitly. Personally, I am treating the last seen location as a unhideable location. This makes the PC's in my game usually move around a little and makes a whole lot more...

So, you think that 7 options of variants of "yes, it's a problem" and 1 "not a big problem" options is a balanced poll? It would be completely logical to have a another "Not a problem" option as well. It wouldn't coincide with your opinion on the matter, but that's not the point of a poll is it...

My interpretation of this: "the extra damage is 2d8 for a 1st-level spell slot, plus 1d8 for each spell level higher than 1st, to a maximum of 5d8." Is that the maximum relates to the extra for spending higher level spell slots. In other words 2d8+5d8 maxiumum (from a 6th, 7th, 8th or 9th level...

The clue here is "sandboxy", not a sandbox adventure, which is a bit of an oxymoron. 5e should be really good at is, with the much larger range that monsters are useable as opponents. Adventures I liked that I found sandboxy are Red Hand of Doom and Reavers of Harkenworld. They are not...

"There is a preference for more open, sandboxy adventures" Time to start delivering then! :)

This app really needs a better spell book, or even better, a way to import spells so you only need to write the spells once.

It isn't about milking your customers, that wasn't my words. That was what I found condecending. If you look at what I write, I write that it's common practise to sell as much as possible, to as high a price as possible. If you look at what they say themselves, they do say that they have...

A condenscendig tone, but probably true. It's pretty much standard practise to sell your digital stuff expensive to begin with, and then after a while, cut down the price to reach a larger market. Nothing wrong with that.

I would say that if you are occupied doing something that requires a skill check, you are at a disadvantage (or possibly, your opponents are at an advantage). Giving someone no chance to detect an incoming attack is something I would reserve for flying, invisible, silenced opponents. ;) The PC...

A good point. A complete scene instead of a character in a white room. Helps a lot when it comes to trigger the imagination.

I really like the 5e art. Same vibe as the art in 2e, but the women usually have normal amounts of clothes/armor.

No they aren't. Just look at what happened to their first attempt at this for 5e. It got cancelled.

I do the same. A good thing too, or one of the players getting critted twice in the first round of combat in one of the fights would probably have been even more annoyed. :D

Well, I did a comment at the end saying: " I am fine with fudging if you cleared the fudging with your players in advance. It's more of a play style thing, even if I think less fudging is better."

I don't really think this is true. I do think you have some good points, but look at your example. The PC's just assumed the guy was the good guy and did his bidding. Let's say the PC's are of a suspicious nature and did some investigation to find if the NPC was trustworthy. If you generated...