Search results

Like yourself? You made claims as to what I was talking about and then when I say your are wrong about what I wrote you insult me?! Really, that is the discourse here? My comment was just letting you know you're misrepresenting my statement or, at the very least, the intent of my statement. If...

That is not what it is about at all.

Nope, not the reason at all.

Can’t believe I never thought about it being the same warrior - makes some sense

See, for me, as a fan of the picture, I’m encouraged by this. I Always like taking old things and looking at them in new way. That’s a huge fun of D&D for me.

I do want to be clear that I do not care whether is a man or a woman. I grew up thinking it was a man, and I’m fine now thinking of it as a woman. And I’m also fine with still thinking it is a man!

Well, I disagreed with your assessment, do we even even know this was WOTC at work and not WizKid?

I don’t think he intends to be sexist, but particularly that last quote of his comes off not the best.

I must say Larry seems a bit out of touch and sexist in that reply. A bit disappointing. EDIT: glad to hear Larry clarified his comments.

I mean, when we are talking about “magic” is there any real difference between gaming and simulation? I mean magic exists just for the game, it can’t really simulate anything

That order makes the most sense of anything proposed. Like @Henadic Theologian said, it isn’t a precise science, but this classification is at least logical!

Sure, but you’re fighting against simple math which seems a bit silly to me. It is a bit like calling Tom Cruise the tallest movie star when the Rock is standing right next to him.

I don’t know how you can possibly justify that; however, if that is true, how do you justify the 2024 rules changes only bring half as important than Tasha’s

Yet I’ve played 5e since about 2 months after launch and never stepped foot in the realms. Adventures , IMO & IME don’t make something default - core books do.

I have more people talk about it being the example setting in the DMG, that does not make it the default setting. I imagine that will continue to be the multiverse as it has been for this edition

If your using 1/4 editions wouldn’t Tasha’s be 5.25 and 2024 be 5.5?

There is no need to hope for this, they have already told us they are not doing that

I agree, I am not talking about everything in the fantasy world , only those things that are magical.

Because your are using fantastic as a broad blanket that covers things that are extraordinary compared a non fantastic world.

I feel the response you quoted shows I understand the subjectivity of fantasy. That is not really the issue though is it?