Search results

This is true, and I do prefer the dryad to not be so monstrous. I was just a bit annoyed at the implication that was made that Wizards somehow stupidly forgot its own past and wanted to point out that 3.5 did not "solve" the problem that was outlined in the article. It may have "solved" the "how...

I'm fairly sure they still either aren't separate races/subraces or don't look look like the same creature but with a different backdrop or different clothes, no other significant difference. Remember the article about the visual difference between ghosts, spectres, and wraiths (here). Even if...

They are assuredly perfectly aware of such solutions. However: Now, is the monstrous creature different from the dryad of 3.5? Sure, but the 3.5 dryad IS monstrous in its own way. Just look at the picture you provided. That's not the classical dryad that people were pushing for in the...

Does this wiki support templates, or could it be made to do so? If it did, we could whip up a quick "all-in-one" page that simply transcludes each of the chapters, perhaps putting each under its own anchored heading.

Everyone I know who wants Vancian magic wants non-Vancian magic, too (e.g. in separate classes), whereas obviously people who don't want Vancian magic will only vote for the one. You can't make any judgments with this poll unless a separate one actually directly pits the two against eachother...

D&D Next is a project codename, anyway. They never intended it to be the actual product name.