• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Spoiler-free review of the new D&D movie.

Hello all,

Yes, yes, I am a terrible man. I have seen the new D&D movie (the elemental might). It doesn't excuse anything, but I will be buying it when it does come out.

I'm not terribly gifted at writing opinion pieces, so bear with me. Here's my account of the movie in question.

First of all, I must say that the movie gains a lot from not being an american movie. That is to say, it's very much different from the 1st one. Different as in better.

For those who said that you can't make a RPG system into a movie, well, I'd say you're wrong. What D&D is has been used effectively to create a coherent world. Magic has definite rules. Creatures have recognizable characteristics. Plus, they use they D&D mythos as part of the backdrop of the story very well. There are even a few references to existing modules. There are a lot of magic items, most of them recognizable and used to good effect.

The story is taken seriously and is coherent. There aren't any stupid characters that make you want to rip out your own spleen and beat yourself unconscious with it. The scenery is pretty good. The CGI is... well, it's adequate.

There are a few flaws that are not unique to this movie. Long BBEG soliloquies happen often, and while they serve to explain the evil dude's motivation, usually make no real sense, ie no evil guy will talk aloud to himself and say "and one day I shall destroy them all!".

There are some bumps in the script, but nothing major. The actions scenes are okay (of Xena level, say). In the beginning, I was afraid that the movie would be a little sappy, or that it would be aimed for a young audience, but when the proverbial fecal matter hits the fan, it's not always pretty.

The acting is adequate, and sub-par for certain characters.

Overall, I'd say that it's much, much better than the first movie, and that's it's totally worth the rental. IMO, it doesn't miss much to be worthy of theatrical release. I hope it does well, and I'm not afraid that it won't.

Now, if you have some questions about the movie, I'd be happy to answer them a little later this evening.

AR

PS: yes, pirating movie is wrong. As soon as the movie comes out, I'm buying it and deleting this movie from my PC. I'm also not going to "distribute" what I have.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



The First movie was dealt some killblows when they had to slice out scenes where the CG never got made due to budget problems. Glad to hear that does not seem to be a problem this time.
 

(Copied from the other thread: )


I liked it.

I mean, it's not great or anything, but it really makes me think how fun a well made,
albeit low budget, D&D TV series could be.


A few thoughts, though:
- Didn't the Dragon Specters survive the first movie? Y'know, as a evil Dragolich God
descends on your city, now would be a pretty neat time to use 'em. Since they're
going with the first movie's continuity an' all.

- Now, since Izhmar surrendered it's Magocracy to the rule of the people 100 years
ago, it really has gone down hill. Maybe the Mages had the right idea after all.

- Hahah. The Lich betraying Damodar was great. He just seemed bored, getting involved
for the heck out of it. That's what centuries of undeath will get you. Boredom.

- For the ÜberHenchman he was in the first, Damodar seemed kinda wimpy here. No
battling at all. Of course, in the first he was just against a bunch of wimpy thieves,
no Lord Minister and gang. Maybe he was just a big puss making big noises with his
purple lipstick and necksnaketentacles.

- Is it me, or was the whole adventuring party just kinda copied from the 3e PHB's
illustrations, right down to the tattoos?

- Damodar was just thrown in jail? Guess who's the baddy in D&D 3, then.

- I liked the Rogue. He was fun.

- The girl playing the Lord Minister's wife was awful. Cute, though.

- The Elf had what, three lines?

Next movie, can we please get a Beholder? There's nothing that says D&D to me like a
Beholder. Beauty in the eye of... and all that.
 

Viking Bastard said:
Next movie, can we please get a Beholder? There's nothing that says D&D to me like a Beholder. Beauty in the eye of... and all that.

Beholders were in the first DnD movie.
 

You must have gotten hold of an older version, considering that the movie isn't called "The Elemental Might" anymore, but rather "Wrath of the Dragon God."

Still, I hope that what you saw is at least similar to the finished version, since it sounds like much more of what I wanted than the first movie was. :)
 


Well, that newer title is definitely better.

This movie was considerably better than the first, imo. If the direction had been a little better, the editing a little tighter, and the CGI improved a fair bit, it would definitely make a reasonable American theatrical release.

The best thing is that it felt like a real D&D adventure, used identifiable D&D spells and magic items, D&D monsters, D&D dungeon conventions, D&D adventuring party composition, and all of the characters got to use their special skills in a useful way, the way a good DM ensures.

Really, other than just being low budget (which means non-top-notch actors and filmmakers), it's a good film.

Definitely recommended. And I quite disliked the first one.
 

Thanks for the reviews, everyone. I'm surprised that comments so far have mainly been positive - I wasn't hoping for much on the budget they were working with. It's nice they've stuck close to the D&D brand.

How does it rate alongside the other films in Sword & Sorcery cinema?
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top