Radiating Gnome
Adventurer
For a new campaign I'm planning, a player is talking about a pretty specific Scout-AoO master build, and I wanted to make sure that there aren't problems in this plan. I *think* it works, and if I didn't have this forum to ask, I'd just allow it, but I'd like to hear what you think.
The Character is planning to play a scout with Exotic Weapon (spiked chain) and combat reflexes. Later he'll add other feats (dodge, mobility, spring attack) to make moving around easier, but the core of his plan is to use the wide AoO threatening area of the spiked chain, and the multilple AoOs provided by combat reflexes, to be able to deliver his extra skirmish damage more than once a round.
So, in a fight, he would move at least 10' position himself where he believes he will be most effective. Then until his next turn, he can have up to his maximum # of AoO's, each one doing extra skirmish damage.
IMO, it follows the letter of the rules, I think it matches the spirit of them as well, and given that this bit of powergaming requires two feats minimum to really work, and then even more feats to make it really powerful, I don't think it's broken.
But . . . anyone have a problem with it?
-rg
The Character is planning to play a scout with Exotic Weapon (spiked chain) and combat reflexes. Later he'll add other feats (dodge, mobility, spring attack) to make moving around easier, but the core of his plan is to use the wide AoO threatening area of the spiked chain, and the multilple AoOs provided by combat reflexes, to be able to deliver his extra skirmish damage more than once a round.
So, in a fight, he would move at least 10' position himself where he believes he will be most effective. Then until his next turn, he can have up to his maximum # of AoO's, each one doing extra skirmish damage.
IMO, it follows the letter of the rules, I think it matches the spirit of them as well, and given that this bit of powergaming requires two feats minimum to really work, and then even more feats to make it really powerful, I don't think it's broken.
But . . . anyone have a problem with it?
-rg