Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
3.x edition beholder questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richards" data-source="post: 7966004" data-attributes="member: 508"><p>1. I don't believe that's ever been specified. It would certainly be a one way to rule it, and as there are different "strains" of beholders it's well within the realm of possibility that some beholders have different-colored eye rays and others are all the same color. I have noticed that some artwork shows the eyestalk eyes all the same color and others have some eyes brown, some green, some blue, etc. - even within a single beholder.</p><p></p><p>2. The main reason is because that's the way that Gary Gygax designed them. But it may be because the beholder finds itself needing to charm humanoids more often, and the <em>charm monster</em> ray is for those occasions when it either needs to charm a more powerful creature or the human it was trying to charm made his save; then it's time to whip out the "spare" charm eye ray for a second attempt.</p><p></p><p>3. The central eye's <em>antimagic field</em> is used primarily for defense, to knock out any magic being used against the beholder. For that reason, it has to close its central eye whenever it wants to send its own eye rays against anyone directly before it. (And thus a beholder in combat is probably opening and closing its central eye repeatedly during combat, giving it a rather odd look.) Of course, since it can see out of those eyestalk eyeballs just as well, there's no reason it can't just pivot its body and send its eye rays up against foes who aren't currently in the path of the central eye's <em>antimagic field</em>. With the ability to direct three of its eystalks in any one 90-degree arc, there's likely one arc where it doesn't need to attack, so it might as well keep that arc magic-free so it isn't an obvious attack path for its foes to come get it.</p><p></p><p>Of course, there's no reason you can't create alternate beholders who have different eye rays and a different power emanating from its central eye. Given the stated hatred beholders have for beholders who are different than themselves, it only makes sense that there are beholders out there with slightly different powers. It's one way to keep the players guessing!</p><p></p><p>Johnathan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richards, post: 7966004, member: 508"] 1. I don't believe that's ever been specified. It would certainly be a one way to rule it, and as there are different "strains" of beholders it's well within the realm of possibility that some beholders have different-colored eye rays and others are all the same color. I have noticed that some artwork shows the eyestalk eyes all the same color and others have some eyes brown, some green, some blue, etc. - even within a single beholder. 2. The main reason is because that's the way that Gary Gygax designed them. But it may be because the beholder finds itself needing to charm humanoids more often, and the [I]charm monster[/I] ray is for those occasions when it either needs to charm a more powerful creature or the human it was trying to charm made his save; then it's time to whip out the "spare" charm eye ray for a second attempt. 3. The central eye's [I]antimagic field[/I] is used primarily for defense, to knock out any magic being used against the beholder. For that reason, it has to close its central eye whenever it wants to send its own eye rays against anyone directly before it. (And thus a beholder in combat is probably opening and closing its central eye repeatedly during combat, giving it a rather odd look.) Of course, since it can see out of those eyestalk eyeballs just as well, there's no reason it can't just pivot its body and send its eye rays up against foes who aren't currently in the path of the central eye's [I]antimagic field[/I]. With the ability to direct three of its eystalks in any one 90-degree arc, there's likely one arc where it doesn't need to attack, so it might as well keep that arc magic-free so it isn't an obvious attack path for its foes to come get it. Of course, there's no reason you can't create alternate beholders who have different eye rays and a different power emanating from its central eye. Given the stated hatred beholders have for beholders who are different than themselves, it only makes sense that there are beholders out there with slightly different powers. It's one way to keep the players guessing! Johnathan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
3.x edition beholder questions
Top