Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4e increased my DM prep time...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Zardoz" data-source="post: 5112391" data-attributes="member: 704"><p>Elements from the original post have been reorganized a bit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that this is a potentially valid concern. In 3rd Edition there was a tendency for me to never mix and match monsters, just pick one and go. In 4th Edition, aside from varients (it is not just Goblin, there is the Goblin Cutter, Goblin Blackblade, Goblin Hexer, Goblin SharpShooter, etc). I can easily see someone spending more time then expected trying to balance out the roles of the monsters present.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am going to have to disagree, or at least ask for a more specific example. I do not see how 4th Edition requires this any more than 3rd edition did.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I can partially agree here. All monster abilities that go beyond inflicting damage take their elements from the conditions list. This has a big effect on the 'flavor' of the description. However, I think that there is enough variance here to say that the monster abilities are still significant.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I will agree to some elements of this. There is not much to tell you when you should insist on a Diplomacy check instead of Bluff. There has not really been a good or compelling solution on how a given DM should go about creating and running a skill challenge. However, this is something that can vary greatly from game to game. I can see some DM's just cobbling a semi random set of skills together and saying 'make some checks and give me X successes'. However, the system as a whole has a huge amount of untapped potential.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is something I entirely agree with. One of 4th Editions benefits is that it streamlined the statblocks for monsters by insisting it was OK for a monster to not need to have every bit of info that a PC or NPC would have. However, there is a big problem when you try to quickly adapt a monster into a helpful NPC, especially if you expect it to need to be around for a while. I do think much of this can be handwaved though.</p><p></p><p>The bigger problem to me is that it is very difficult for a DM to keep an NPC alive if he ever uses it in combat. In 3rd Edition I could use potions, spells, magic items to give an NPC a few viable escape options (ie: break line of sight, use a rope trick. Fly away with a Fly potion). 4th Edition does not give me many options for having something cleanly escape.</p><p></p><p>As for suggestions, that is a bit trickier:</p><p>For monster prep time:</p><p></p><p>The encounter builder works well enough for me. I suggest deciding first on what kind of mix you want; Do you want to have a single heavy monster with support? Do you want to have front liners run interference for artillery? How durable do you want your monsters, and how much risk do you want to provide?</p><p></p><p>Higher level monsters simply hit more and wont be hit as often. Using them will increase risk to your players. Most 4th Edition encounters and adventures I have seen tend to use monsters of a slightly higher level then your players. If you go from 2 levels higher to 2 levels lower, your players will have a much easier time dealing with the encounter.</p><p></p><p>From there it is just pulling in what ever makes the most sense for the encounter.</p><p></p><p>For Skill Challenges:</p><p></p><p>For any skill challenge you need these things:</p><p></p><p> - A Reward for Success / A Punishment for Failure: Both your reward and your punishment must be something that should stick around for a while and have a real effect on the game. Something that should at least be worth using limitied resources. Forcing players to lose healing surges or access to encounter / daily powers is a good punishment. A free action point, treasure, or a semi-persistant bonus is a good reward. What ever it is should just matter though.</p><p></p><p> - A Resolution Mechanism: This is flexible. You can go with X success before Y failure, 3 Strikes to fail. You can have each player make X checks and give out one 'Penalty' per failure per player.</p><p></p><p> - A set of relevant Skills / Options. This is probably the trickiest, since you need to engage every player but avoid having one player dominate. You should also try to do more then providing a list of skills a player may use. You could allow a player to make a check vs a harder DC to cancel a previous failure. You can allow a check against a hard DC to gain a bonus to other rolls rather then gain a single success. Or you could allow a player to gain a success without a skill check if they just pay cash, or do something particularly intelligent.</p><p></p><p>END COMMUNICATION</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Zardoz, post: 5112391, member: 704"] Elements from the original post have been reorganized a bit. I think that this is a potentially valid concern. In 3rd Edition there was a tendency for me to never mix and match monsters, just pick one and go. In 4th Edition, aside from varients (it is not just Goblin, there is the Goblin Cutter, Goblin Blackblade, Goblin Hexer, Goblin SharpShooter, etc). I can easily see someone spending more time then expected trying to balance out the roles of the monsters present. I am going to have to disagree, or at least ask for a more specific example. I do not see how 4th Edition requires this any more than 3rd edition did. I can partially agree here. All monster abilities that go beyond inflicting damage take their elements from the conditions list. This has a big effect on the 'flavor' of the description. However, I think that there is enough variance here to say that the monster abilities are still significant. I will agree to some elements of this. There is not much to tell you when you should insist on a Diplomacy check instead of Bluff. There has not really been a good or compelling solution on how a given DM should go about creating and running a skill challenge. However, this is something that can vary greatly from game to game. I can see some DM's just cobbling a semi random set of skills together and saying 'make some checks and give me X successes'. However, the system as a whole has a huge amount of untapped potential. This is something I entirely agree with. One of 4th Editions benefits is that it streamlined the statblocks for monsters by insisting it was OK for a monster to not need to have every bit of info that a PC or NPC would have. However, there is a big problem when you try to quickly adapt a monster into a helpful NPC, especially if you expect it to need to be around for a while. I do think much of this can be handwaved though. The bigger problem to me is that it is very difficult for a DM to keep an NPC alive if he ever uses it in combat. In 3rd Edition I could use potions, spells, magic items to give an NPC a few viable escape options (ie: break line of sight, use a rope trick. Fly away with a Fly potion). 4th Edition does not give me many options for having something cleanly escape. As for suggestions, that is a bit trickier: For monster prep time: The encounter builder works well enough for me. I suggest deciding first on what kind of mix you want; Do you want to have a single heavy monster with support? Do you want to have front liners run interference for artillery? How durable do you want your monsters, and how much risk do you want to provide? Higher level monsters simply hit more and wont be hit as often. Using them will increase risk to your players. Most 4th Edition encounters and adventures I have seen tend to use monsters of a slightly higher level then your players. If you go from 2 levels higher to 2 levels lower, your players will have a much easier time dealing with the encounter. From there it is just pulling in what ever makes the most sense for the encounter. For Skill Challenges: For any skill challenge you need these things: - A Reward for Success / A Punishment for Failure: Both your reward and your punishment must be something that should stick around for a while and have a real effect on the game. Something that should at least be worth using limitied resources. Forcing players to lose healing surges or access to encounter / daily powers is a good punishment. A free action point, treasure, or a semi-persistant bonus is a good reward. What ever it is should just matter though. - A Resolution Mechanism: This is flexible. You can go with X success before Y failure, 3 Strikes to fail. You can have each player make X checks and give out one 'Penalty' per failure per player. - A set of relevant Skills / Options. This is probably the trickiest, since you need to engage every player but avoid having one player dominate. You should also try to do more then providing a list of skills a player may use. You could allow a player to make a check vs a harder DC to cancel a previous failure. You can allow a check against a hard DC to gain a bonus to other rolls rather then gain a single success. Or you could allow a player to gain a success without a skill check if they just pay cash, or do something particularly intelligent. END COMMUNICATION [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4e increased my DM prep time...
Top