Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
[4e] Paladin (feat) advice needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 6840280" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Part of it, frankly, is Keehnelf's ability to take a step back and tell himself, "This is a new game, with a new goal and purpose. What's that like in action? Maybe it could be fun." He doesn't expect every D&D to be the same D&D--just that it have...plausible similarity, I guess. And with our game, he's specifically pushing the system in the directions that it most thoroughly encourages: refluff things, customize your monsters the way you want them to work, have high-action high-drama scenes, be open to the strange and the crazy if your players are, etc.</p><p></p><p>I definitely feel like his experience with far, far "looser" systems is a huge boon for being a first-time 4e DM; specifically, the PbtA games. Despite being mechanically as different as night and day, 4e captures a similar result. In fact, they may not actually be <em>that</em> much different! Both games have clear, overt rules the players can see and leverage. Both have important guidelines for the DM--but specific advice to disregard those guidelines when it makes for a better game. Both put an emphasis on party diversity to avoid issues during play (DW classes tend to have one Core Thing, so two Fighters can be kind of dull; 4e classes have their roles, and having the four bases covered is Pretty Important). Sure, the specific mechanical implementation is different, but I mean, 4e's keywords are effectively identical to DW's tags, in that they point to specific game-rule elements and are often used for balance of some kind (consider the number of DW classes that have the "you ignore the Clumsy tag on armor you wear" feature!)</p><p></p><p>And, lest I pain an inaccurate picture: none of this is to say that he's jettisoned his old sensibilities. They're absolutely still there, and he's had some beefs with the way the book authors casually present highly debatable stuff as standard or even expected (e.g. "all that non-combat stuff is a nice break between bouts of FUN" and such claptrap). It's just that he can evaluate things from within their new context--as long as they don't disparage, intentionally or unintentionally, the contexts he's coming from. Because of that, I think his focus has been more on, "Wow, this is pretty solid for its goals!" rather than "Wow, this is NOT the game I expected to play!" And that difference--pleased at a thing being good for its particular flavor, rather than bothered for it not having the "right" flavor--is what has made everything else possible.</p><p></p><p>As a result, he's giving 4e a no-holds-barred, fully on-board run, and it's going great, at least for me. If I had stumbled on his recruitment threads without knowing the context behind the game, I don't think I'd ever know that he is a self-professed grognard coming into 4e for the first time. Even his first attempt at a Skill Challenge was solid (though he's also improved, rapidly); his encounters are varied and challenging, and thus far we've only had one (the very first of the campaign, for me at least--I joined up a session late) that didn't have some kind of altered or tweaked victory condition besides "kill all the things dead." He's eminently comfortable reskinning, tweaking, and adapting monsters to fit the context, like with the mainframe/turret fight (I don't remember the details, but he explained them to us after). Sometimes, little rules minutia slip past, e.g. he wasn't sure whether forced movement considers difficult terrain (it doesn't, but blocking terrain e.g. solid walls, and hindering terrain e.g. lava pools, do), but that's hardly surprising even for a longtime GM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 6840280, member: 6790260"] Part of it, frankly, is Keehnelf's ability to take a step back and tell himself, "This is a new game, with a new goal and purpose. What's that like in action? Maybe it could be fun." He doesn't expect every D&D to be the same D&D--just that it have...plausible similarity, I guess. And with our game, he's specifically pushing the system in the directions that it most thoroughly encourages: refluff things, customize your monsters the way you want them to work, have high-action high-drama scenes, be open to the strange and the crazy if your players are, etc. I definitely feel like his experience with far, far "looser" systems is a huge boon for being a first-time 4e DM; specifically, the PbtA games. Despite being mechanically as different as night and day, 4e captures a similar result. In fact, they may not actually be [I]that[/I] much different! Both games have clear, overt rules the players can see and leverage. Both have important guidelines for the DM--but specific advice to disregard those guidelines when it makes for a better game. Both put an emphasis on party diversity to avoid issues during play (DW classes tend to have one Core Thing, so two Fighters can be kind of dull; 4e classes have their roles, and having the four bases covered is Pretty Important). Sure, the specific mechanical implementation is different, but I mean, 4e's keywords are effectively identical to DW's tags, in that they point to specific game-rule elements and are often used for balance of some kind (consider the number of DW classes that have the "you ignore the Clumsy tag on armor you wear" feature!) And, lest I pain an inaccurate picture: none of this is to say that he's jettisoned his old sensibilities. They're absolutely still there, and he's had some beefs with the way the book authors casually present highly debatable stuff as standard or even expected (e.g. "all that non-combat stuff is a nice break between bouts of FUN" and such claptrap). It's just that he can evaluate things from within their new context--as long as they don't disparage, intentionally or unintentionally, the contexts he's coming from. Because of that, I think his focus has been more on, "Wow, this is pretty solid for its goals!" rather than "Wow, this is NOT the game I expected to play!" And that difference--pleased at a thing being good for its particular flavor, rather than bothered for it not having the "right" flavor--is what has made everything else possible. As a result, he's giving 4e a no-holds-barred, fully on-board run, and it's going great, at least for me. If I had stumbled on his recruitment threads without knowing the context behind the game, I don't think I'd ever know that he is a self-professed grognard coming into 4e for the first time. Even his first attempt at a Skill Challenge was solid (though he's also improved, rapidly); his encounters are varied and challenging, and thus far we've only had one (the very first of the campaign, for me at least--I joined up a session late) that didn't have some kind of altered or tweaked victory condition besides "kill all the things dead." He's eminently comfortable reskinning, tweaking, and adapting monsters to fit the context, like with the mainframe/turret fight (I don't remember the details, but he explained them to us after). Sometimes, little rules minutia slip past, e.g. he wasn't sure whether forced movement considers difficult terrain (it doesn't, but blocking terrain e.g. solid walls, and hindering terrain e.g. lava pools, do), but that's hardly surprising even for a longtime GM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
[4e] Paladin (feat) advice needed
Top