Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Modest Proposal... (Regarding TWF)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crothian" data-source="post: 121604" data-attributes="member: 232"><p>Ya, this is House Rules Forun stuff, but that won't stop me from replying.</p><p></p><p>First, I must say by the title of the thread I was really hoping wacked out ideas on solving the problems of TWF that are not supported by the author, but were actually ideas given to him by an Americian. Ya, that's a not so funny take on the real Modest Proposal by John Swift. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>You're trying to make this require less feats, but in reality your requiring it to take many more. Weapon Focus is a weapon specific. So, TWF would only be applied to that weapon. If I wanted to fight with short sword and a long sword I'd need WF in each and TWF in each. Otherwise why would WF short sword help with fighting with 2 long swords? </p><p></p><p>As it is, you don't need both feats to fight with 2 weapons. That's one of the things about TWF. Sure, it's a lot easier, but not absolutely needed. You need rapid shot to fire that extra arrow. Also, it's not fair to compare ranged attack feats with melee attack feats. They appear similiar, but there is a lot of difference between the two. </p><p></p><p>You idea isn't bad. I think you need a different prerequite feat besides weapon focus. I'd go with Ambidexterity personally. Otherwise, what becaomes of that feat?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crothian, post: 121604, member: 232"] Ya, this is House Rules Forun stuff, but that won't stop me from replying. First, I must say by the title of the thread I was really hoping wacked out ideas on solving the problems of TWF that are not supported by the author, but were actually ideas given to him by an Americian. Ya, that's a not so funny take on the real Modest Proposal by John Swift. :D You're trying to make this require less feats, but in reality your requiring it to take many more. Weapon Focus is a weapon specific. So, TWF would only be applied to that weapon. If I wanted to fight with short sword and a long sword I'd need WF in each and TWF in each. Otherwise why would WF short sword help with fighting with 2 long swords? As it is, you don't need both feats to fight with 2 weapons. That's one of the things about TWF. Sure, it's a lot easier, but not absolutely needed. You need rapid shot to fire that extra arrow. Also, it's not fair to compare ranged attack feats with melee attack feats. They appear similiar, but there is a lot of difference between the two. You idea isn't bad. I think you need a different prerequite feat besides weapon focus. I'd go with Ambidexterity personally. Otherwise, what becaomes of that feat? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Modest Proposal... (Regarding TWF)
Top