Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A problem with new school as of 3.x and later. Or is it a problem?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xechnao" data-source="post: 5070516" data-attributes="member: 58105"><p>What do you think is better and why? </p><p></p><p>A game with a focus on choice of character building options or a game with a focus on game options?</p><p>I see these as two different paths in game design. Old school D&D was more of the later, new school more of the former.</p><p>Gameplay is different as practically one excludes the other at some points. </p><p>In old school everyone more or less knew most about the game characters: what they could achieve. In new school the game is more about the joy of discovering the new, unknown character builds.</p><p></p><p>In 3.x and 4e adventures do not usually analyze the character options as prerequisites for the various adventure options. It is mostly up to the players to make effective builds versus the challenge ratings and this is mostly dependent to the game rules than the adventure and the adventure options. </p><p>In old school one could correspond the character options,as for example equipment or the party decisions, with the adventure options. In new school it is very hard to go with the same approach- for example thinking of all the various possible feats and skills to model the adventure options around this is impossible. This is why challenge ratings are necessary in the design and the ability to effectively play the game. But it is a different game: a game of "deck" building rather than a game of having sorted out your options and thinking of what you want to do with them in regards to the adventure itself. </p><p></p><p>In case anyone does not agree with this distinction of old school versus new school let me say that tabletop rpg design is effectively nothing more and nothing less than the game's mere interface. In tabletop everything in theory is possible so what we are buying from a published game is the interface it has come up with. So what matters is interface: different interfaces will usually result in different game in practice. All the same options may be there but the different interface is what makes the difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xechnao, post: 5070516, member: 58105"] What do you think is better and why? A game with a focus on choice of character building options or a game with a focus on game options? I see these as two different paths in game design. Old school D&D was more of the later, new school more of the former. Gameplay is different as practically one excludes the other at some points. In old school everyone more or less knew most about the game characters: what they could achieve. In new school the game is more about the joy of discovering the new, unknown character builds. In 3.x and 4e adventures do not usually analyze the character options as prerequisites for the various adventure options. It is mostly up to the players to make effective builds versus the challenge ratings and this is mostly dependent to the game rules than the adventure and the adventure options. In old school one could correspond the character options,as for example equipment or the party decisions, with the adventure options. In new school it is very hard to go with the same approach- for example thinking of all the various possible feats and skills to model the adventure options around this is impossible. This is why challenge ratings are necessary in the design and the ability to effectively play the game. But it is a different game: a game of "deck" building rather than a game of having sorted out your options and thinking of what you want to do with them in regards to the adventure itself. In case anyone does not agree with this distinction of old school versus new school let me say that tabletop rpg design is effectively nothing more and nothing less than the game's mere interface. In tabletop everything in theory is possible so what we are buying from a published game is the interface it has come up with. So what matters is interface: different interfaces will usually result in different game in practice. All the same options may be there but the different interface is what makes the difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A problem with new school as of 3.x and later. Or is it a problem?
Top