Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An Evil party... Troublesome?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mhacdebhandia" data-source="post: 3662964" data-attributes="member: 18832"><p>The first Third Edition game I played, a Planescape campaign, included a slight majority of evil characters.</p><p></p><p>The simple solution is twofold.</p><p></p><p>First, remember that "evil" doesn't have to mean "stupidly shortsighted". You might be playing an amoral wizard who is willing to step on anyone who gets in the way of her controlling the Mages' Guild, but if there was ever a set of candidates for "careful cultivation" instead of "ruthless exploitation", it's your fellow PCs. Nine times out of ten it is genuinely in your best interests to work with each other to achieve your goals - any betrayal has to be committed in order to gain something that's genuinely worth losing a known quantity as your ally.</p><p></p><p>None of this is an issue of "law" versus "chaos", either. On the scale of an adventuring party and their associates, even the most chaotic characters can work together in (relative) harmony. The real problems you might encounter would be when the long-term goals each character is shooting for conflict: if one PC wants to establish iron-fisted rule over a small barony and another wants to tear the same barony's major city apart with factionalism by pitting its powerful factions against each other, you have to consider what will happen when these two goals collide. Both can work together for a while - having the city fall apart from internecine strife is probably a good setup for a tyrant to take over by promising to restore order - but eventually these contrasting motivations will come into conflict.</p><p></p><p>Second, as the DM, structure your adventures to encourage the PCs to cooperate, even if they never become best of friends. Apart from the old standby of "you all work for a larger power which demands that its agents cooperate", it's also not that hard to work things out so that the best ally for a particular job is one of the PCs.</p><p></p><p>I remember, for instance, that a wizard in the previously-mentioned Planescape game wanted to take over a wizards' society to which he belonged and turn it into a cultlike organisation which he could control and exploit for power and resources. He ended up striking a deal with one of the warriors in the party to organise a group of mercenaries who would help the wizard eliminate his superiors, as well as with another PC who could arrange for assistance from the forces of a certain demon lord of the Abyss.</p><p></p><p>This latter arrangement had repercussions later in the campaign when the demon lord in question expected the wizard and, by extension, the rest of the party to serve his interests in a looming conflict with the forces of Baator. As it happened, the wizard turned his back on this purported debt - but, unbeknownst to him, the cleric in the party became a devotee of the demon lord and kept tabs on the party's activities on his behalf.</p><p></p><p>None of these allegiances and betrayals came to a head until the climax of the game, when everyone took sides and tried to screw each other over. Before that point, though there was plenty of conflict between personalities and arguments over the direction we should be taking, there were very few serious problems.</p><p></p><p>I think the key is to give everyone a reason why they should cooperate. Evil people can have friends or family whom they wouldn't betray, for instance. A common faith or cause can provide cohesion. Making sure that another PC's unique abilities or resources are important to fulfilling another PC's goals is a pretty easy GM "cheat" to keep them working together.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mhacdebhandia, post: 3662964, member: 18832"] The first Third Edition game I played, a Planescape campaign, included a slight majority of evil characters. The simple solution is twofold. First, remember that "evil" doesn't have to mean "stupidly shortsighted". You might be playing an amoral wizard who is willing to step on anyone who gets in the way of her controlling the Mages' Guild, but if there was ever a set of candidates for "careful cultivation" instead of "ruthless exploitation", it's your fellow PCs. Nine times out of ten it is genuinely in your best interests to work with each other to achieve your goals - any betrayal has to be committed in order to gain something that's genuinely worth losing a known quantity as your ally. None of this is an issue of "law" versus "chaos", either. On the scale of an adventuring party and their associates, even the most chaotic characters can work together in (relative) harmony. The real problems you might encounter would be when the long-term goals each character is shooting for conflict: if one PC wants to establish iron-fisted rule over a small barony and another wants to tear the same barony's major city apart with factionalism by pitting its powerful factions against each other, you have to consider what will happen when these two goals collide. Both can work together for a while - having the city fall apart from internecine strife is probably a good setup for a tyrant to take over by promising to restore order - but eventually these contrasting motivations will come into conflict. Second, as the DM, structure your adventures to encourage the PCs to cooperate, even if they never become best of friends. Apart from the old standby of "you all work for a larger power which demands that its agents cooperate", it's also not that hard to work things out so that the best ally for a particular job is one of the PCs. I remember, for instance, that a wizard in the previously-mentioned Planescape game wanted to take over a wizards' society to which he belonged and turn it into a cultlike organisation which he could control and exploit for power and resources. He ended up striking a deal with one of the warriors in the party to organise a group of mercenaries who would help the wizard eliminate his superiors, as well as with another PC who could arrange for assistance from the forces of a certain demon lord of the Abyss. This latter arrangement had repercussions later in the campaign when the demon lord in question expected the wizard and, by extension, the rest of the party to serve his interests in a looming conflict with the forces of Baator. As it happened, the wizard turned his back on this purported debt - but, unbeknownst to him, the cleric in the party became a devotee of the demon lord and kept tabs on the party's activities on his behalf. None of these allegiances and betrayals came to a head until the climax of the game, when everyone took sides and tried to screw each other over. Before that point, though there was plenty of conflict between personalities and arguments over the direction we should be taking, there were very few serious problems. I think the key is to give everyone a reason why they should cooperate. Evil people can have friends or family whom they wouldn't betray, for instance. A common faith or cause can provide cohesion. Making sure that another PC's unique abilities or resources are important to fulfilling another PC's goals is a pretty easy GM "cheat" to keep them working together. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An Evil party... Troublesome?
Top