Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
An Unexpected Victory, Unconditional Surrender, and Unfinished Business.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="robconley" data-source="post: 8919799" data-attributes="member: 5636"><p><h3>An Unexpected Victory, Unconditional Surrender, and Unfinished Business.</h3><p>I understand everybody is tired of Wizard's drama despite the good news. I appreciate that once again you have taken the time to read my post and hope the following is informative and useful.</p><p></p><p>Friday afternoon, Wizards of the Coast using <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1439-ogl-1-0a-creative-commons" target="_blank">DnD Beyond announced this</a>.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEguA7ZUy4wKBWgQIi6whCUpNtJSQVhTB8CkR1RsPNOgPKOxko2QdQkgamotAgDubUUqpc4BdxwuiJRJnhDM-SvyeUZxD90GY1jaGnFVBbMFOizh23ofCGsWzDwDnUiHlFKXxa5Er2-B5dQsAQUAifDZu41nrmwEtj6jg8PA8kudDCdFnhkcWpRGiYbCDg" target="_blank"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEguA7ZUy4wKBWgQIi6whCUpNtJSQVhTB8CkR1RsPNOgPKOxko2QdQkgamotAgDubUUqpc4BdxwuiJRJnhDM-SvyeUZxD90GY1jaGnFVBbMFOizh23ofCGsWzDwDnUiHlFKXxa5Er2-B5dQsAQUAifDZu41nrmwEtj6jg8PA8kudDCdFnhkcWpRGiYbCDg=w426-h105" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="width: 710px; height: 175px" /></a></p><p>The hobby and industry resounding <strong>NO! </strong>worked! With results far better than expected with the entirety of the 5e 5.1 SRD released under the CC-BY 4.0 license. The link is below.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/attachments/39j2li89/SRD5.1-CCBY4.0License.pdf" target="_blank">SRD 5.1-CC</a></p><h3>Saying No!</h3><p>The numbers were pretty clear even for an Internet survey.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">88% do not want to publish TTRPG content under OGL 1.2.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">90% would have to change some aspect of their business to accommodate OGL 1.2.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">89% are dissatisfied with deauthorizing OGL 1.0a.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">86% are dissatisfied with the draft VTT policy.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">62% are satisfied with including Systems Reference Document (SRD) content in Creative Commons, and the majority of those who were dissatisfied asked for more SRD content in Creative Commons.</li> </ul><p></p><p>Coupled with the larger media world covering the story, and major investors being critical, the conditions for a victory fell into place last week.</p><p>The fact that the tabletop roleplaying industry and hobby spoke with one voice is amazing and we should all be proud of what each of us did to make this happen.</p><h3>This can't be true, I don't just trust Wizards</h3><p>The licensing of the 5.1 SRD under CC is done and the license terms of CC-BY 4.0 are irrevocable. So that part we can count as a win. A win that in my opinion counts as unconditional surrender. However, there remains some unfinished business to make sure there is peace and not a ceasefire.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>The OGL 1.0a</em></strong></p><p>Wizards have stated they will leave the OGL 1.0a in place.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhuKhM-C21KIJ3HjC-7jKI0EZhfl9aZCLhp-UPvAuRE0xTuqDYUXytbzPsyuXivRQvpOUBhnAU3Nl5qtTvhBgXftTIs9CPxSOrFJknm8_4eB7tXqwnOqAAVEG6pp-vNyZEx7CIdyjIMv0NyF9bRa66xBxe8UcI31zfh305Rzuw56hDuFkPysdvmLCjMPg" target="_blank"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhuKhM-C21KIJ3HjC-7jKI0EZhfl9aZCLhp-UPvAuRE0xTuqDYUXytbzPsyuXivRQvpOUBhnAU3Nl5qtTvhBgXftTIs9CPxSOrFJknm8_4eB7tXqwnOqAAVEG6pp-vNyZEx7CIdyjIMv0NyF9bRa66xBxe8UcI31zfh305Rzuw56hDuFkPysdvmLCjMPg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p>However, one result of the last few weeks was the microscope that the OGL 1.0a was placed under. To avoid the problem of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_work" target="_blank">orphaned works</a>. And to avoid impact on third parties who use the OGL to support other RPGs like <a href="https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/97239/Legend" target="_blank">Legend</a>, <a href="https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/187941/Cepheus-Engine-SRD-Modifiable-Version" target="_blank">Cepheus </a>and the <a href="https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse.php?filters=45582_0_0_0_0&src=fid45582" target="_blank">OSR</a>. There needs to be an authorized OGL 1.0b released by WoTC.</p><p></p><p>The two provisions that are needed are</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">That Section 4, Grant and Consideration of the OGL incorporates the term irrevocable.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">That Section 1, Definitions, Includes a definition of authorization that states it refers to any license that has been officially released for use by third parties by Wizards. That license can not be deauthorized once released.</li> </ul><p></p><p>With these two provisions, the issue with orphaned works and creators using the OGL for non DnD systems can be mitigated greatly.</p><p><a href="https://paizo.com/community/blog/v5748dyo6si7v" target="_blank"><strong><em>The Open RPG Content License (ORC)</em></strong></a></p><p>The development of the ORC license needs to continue and be supported. The imminent loss of the OGL 1.0a and the ethos it represented made the industry and hobby realize just how important open gaming as a whole is. Not just for the DnD but for all the other creative projects that have been shared under the OGL. If the current plan is followed, then the ORC license itself will be under the control of an independent non-profit creating a level playing field as far as control of the license goes.</p><p>From both a business and creative perspective, everybody now realizes that independence from Wizards and the DnD Brand is of vital importance. DnD as an RPG system will remain first in the hobby's heart . With SRDs licensed under ORC the fate of the DnD system doesn't have to be tied to the fate of the DnD Brand. With the 5.1 SRD released under CC-BY 4.0. The creation of alternative SRDs has become a lot easier.</p><p><strong><em>CC versus ORC</em></strong></p><p>But why not just use one of the creative commons licenses, to begin with? Because of licensed content. If you are making an original system or setting, I agree it is a wash whether one uses CC or another license. Might as well go with the one (or none) that reflects your sentiments as to the sharing of your original work.</p><p>The point of open content licenses is to provide clarity. Letting people know what you, as the author, are OK with when folks remix your content. With traditionally licensed content, the owner IP decided that their content would only be licensed for a limited time under limited terms. The OGL recognized that by creating a way to clearly remix licensed content with open content. Doing this in a way that preserves the rights and permissions of both.</p><p>While Creative Commons has guidance on how to license only part of your work. It doesn't provide clarity and leaves it up to the author to how this is indicated. Something like ORC can help provide clarity by tailoring the spirit of Creative Commons to the conditions of our hobby and industry.</p><p><a href="https://creativecommons.org/faq/#how-do-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-my-material" target="_blank">From the Creative FAQ</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>The D20 SRD and the D20 Modern SRD</em></strong></p><p>In addition to changes to the OGL 1.0a, we need to press WoTC to release the d20 SRD and the d20 Modern SRD under a CC-BY license. These two works are foundational to many projects both DnD related and non DnD related. Plus doing this will disarm Wizard of many more terms (monsters, spells, etc.) to use for IP bullying and lawfare.</p><p><em><strong>DriveThruRPG and the VTTs</strong></em></p><p>There is little dispute that Wizard's DnD branded products, the DM's Guild, and licensed VTT modules, form the bulk of the business that DriveThruRPG and VTTs like Roll20, Fantasy Grounds, and Foundry do. Losing access to their platforms would be catastrophic for many publishers and authors including myself. Collectively they are an Achilles heel of our hobby and industry if Wizards uses its economic power to force unwanted changes for these platforms.</p><p>This is not theoretical either. Aside from the restriction of the now defunct VTT policy proposal. DriveThruRPG posted this on their discord server.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEg_9Avd6-_iy1YtgLglvrwdttgYXsCvZT2V4l3cmneJZC29lkotyUAjXi762QJ7WvOUFxlCF8nNx-69vbYh7nnvWhz9h2geLLL0g46-w1drUjp0NpurR7izm7OOexC_TrOvUle6W2IqogxtHLbvIq2ViBulF8TSpkwxjPQ5b1UIYJs9bCykvtop8uGFuQ" target="_blank"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEg_9Avd6-_iy1YtgLglvrwdttgYXsCvZT2V4l3cmneJZC29lkotyUAjXi762QJ7WvOUFxlCF8nNx-69vbYh7nnvWhz9h2geLLL0g46-w1drUjp0NpurR7izm7OOexC_TrOvUle6W2IqogxtHLbvIq2ViBulF8TSpkwxjPQ5b1UIYJs9bCykvtop8uGFuQ" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p>Note this sentence</p><p></p><p></p><p>So I would like to know what this was in alternative to if Wizards followed through on their initial plans?</p><p></p><p>More importantly, this highlights how much of a vulnerable bottleneck these companies and their marketplace are. There are no easy answers to these questions. But the discussion needs to happen. We need to deal with the fact a single company, WoTC, holds an economic dagger to the hobby's heart. Another issue that walk parallel to the IP issues surrounding the OGL.</p><p></p><h3><strong>Going Forward</strong></h3><p>I think we are in a midst of an inflection point in the history of the hobby and industry. That the events of the last three weeks will be marked as the beginning of when the hobby and industry charts an independent course from the DnD Brand and the company that owns it. Wizards will still compete but more and more it will be on a level playing field.</p><p></p><p>I know you are tired and want to have fun playing the games we love with people we enjoy playing with. While supporting the creators who help us make this happen. But the peace must be secured or it will be just a ceasefire.</p><p></p><p>So once again.</p><p>Fight On!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="robconley, post: 8919799, member: 5636"] [HEADING=2]An Unexpected Victory, Unconditional Surrender, and Unfinished Business.[/HEADING] I understand everybody is tired of Wizard's drama despite the good news. I appreciate that once again you have taken the time to read my post and hope the following is informative and useful. Friday afternoon, Wizards of the Coast using [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1439-ogl-1-0a-creative-commons']DnD Beyond announced this[/URL]. [URL='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEguA7ZUy4wKBWgQIi6whCUpNtJSQVhTB8CkR1RsPNOgPKOxko2QdQkgamotAgDubUUqpc4BdxwuiJRJnhDM-SvyeUZxD90GY1jaGnFVBbMFOizh23ofCGsWzDwDnUiHlFKXxa5Er2-B5dQsAQUAifDZu41nrmwEtj6jg8PA8kudDCdFnhkcWpRGiYbCDg'][IMG width="710px" height="175px"]https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEguA7ZUy4wKBWgQIi6whCUpNtJSQVhTB8CkR1RsPNOgPKOxko2QdQkgamotAgDubUUqpc4BdxwuiJRJnhDM-SvyeUZxD90GY1jaGnFVBbMFOizh23ofCGsWzDwDnUiHlFKXxa5Er2-B5dQsAQUAifDZu41nrmwEtj6jg8PA8kudDCdFnhkcWpRGiYbCDg=w426-h105[/IMG][/URL] The hobby and industry resounding [B]NO! [/B]worked! With results far better than expected with the entirety of the 5e 5.1 SRD released under the CC-BY 4.0 license. The link is below. [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/attachments/39j2li89/SRD5.1-CCBY4.0License.pdf']SRD 5.1-CC[/URL] [HEADING=2]Saying No![/HEADING] The numbers were pretty clear even for an Internet survey. [LIST] [*]88% do not want to publish TTRPG content under OGL 1.2. [*]90% would have to change some aspect of their business to accommodate OGL 1.2. [*]89% are dissatisfied with deauthorizing OGL 1.0a. [*]86% are dissatisfied with the draft VTT policy. [*]62% are satisfied with including Systems Reference Document (SRD) content in Creative Commons, and the majority of those who were dissatisfied asked for more SRD content in Creative Commons. [/LIST] Coupled with the larger media world covering the story, and major investors being critical, the conditions for a victory fell into place last week. The fact that the tabletop roleplaying industry and hobby spoke with one voice is amazing and we should all be proud of what each of us did to make this happen. [HEADING=2]This can't be true, I don't just trust Wizards[/HEADING] The licensing of the 5.1 SRD under CC is done and the license terms of CC-BY 4.0 are irrevocable. So that part we can count as a win. A win that in my opinion counts as unconditional surrender. However, there remains some unfinished business to make sure there is peace and not a ceasefire. [B][I]The OGL 1.0a[/I][/B] Wizards have stated they will leave the OGL 1.0a in place. [URL='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhuKhM-C21KIJ3HjC-7jKI0EZhfl9aZCLhp-UPvAuRE0xTuqDYUXytbzPsyuXivRQvpOUBhnAU3Nl5qtTvhBgXftTIs9CPxSOrFJknm8_4eB7tXqwnOqAAVEG6pp-vNyZEx7CIdyjIMv0NyF9bRa66xBxe8UcI31zfh305Rzuw56hDuFkPysdvmLCjMPg'][IMG]https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhuKhM-C21KIJ3HjC-7jKI0EZhfl9aZCLhp-UPvAuRE0xTuqDYUXytbzPsyuXivRQvpOUBhnAU3Nl5qtTvhBgXftTIs9CPxSOrFJknm8_4eB7tXqwnOqAAVEG6pp-vNyZEx7CIdyjIMv0NyF9bRa66xBxe8UcI31zfh305Rzuw56hDuFkPysdvmLCjMPg[/IMG][/URL] However, one result of the last few weeks was the microscope that the OGL 1.0a was placed under. To avoid the problem of [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_work']orphaned works[/URL]. And to avoid impact on third parties who use the OGL to support other RPGs like [URL='https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/97239/Legend']Legend[/URL], [URL='https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/187941/Cepheus-Engine-SRD-Modifiable-Version']Cepheus [/URL]and the [URL='https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse.php?filters=45582_0_0_0_0&src=fid45582']OSR[/URL]. There needs to be an authorized OGL 1.0b released by WoTC. The two provisions that are needed are [LIST] [*]That Section 4, Grant and Consideration of the OGL incorporates the term irrevocable. [*]That Section 1, Definitions, Includes a definition of authorization that states it refers to any license that has been officially released for use by third parties by Wizards. That license can not be deauthorized once released. [/LIST] With these two provisions, the issue with orphaned works and creators using the OGL for non DnD systems can be mitigated greatly. [URL='https://paizo.com/community/blog/v5748dyo6si7v'][B][I]The Open RPG Content License (ORC)[/I][/B][/URL] The development of the ORC license needs to continue and be supported. The imminent loss of the OGL 1.0a and the ethos it represented made the industry and hobby realize just how important open gaming as a whole is. Not just for the DnD but for all the other creative projects that have been shared under the OGL. If the current plan is followed, then the ORC license itself will be under the control of an independent non-profit creating a level playing field as far as control of the license goes. From both a business and creative perspective, everybody now realizes that independence from Wizards and the DnD Brand is of vital importance. DnD as an RPG system will remain first in the hobby's heart . With SRDs licensed under ORC the fate of the DnD system doesn't have to be tied to the fate of the DnD Brand. With the 5.1 SRD released under CC-BY 4.0. The creation of alternative SRDs has become a lot easier. [B][I]CC versus ORC[/I][/B] But why not just use one of the creative commons licenses, to begin with? Because of licensed content. If you are making an original system or setting, I agree it is a wash whether one uses CC or another license. Might as well go with the one (or none) that reflects your sentiments as to the sharing of your original work. The point of open content licenses is to provide clarity. Letting people know what you, as the author, are OK with when folks remix your content. With traditionally licensed content, the owner IP decided that their content would only be licensed for a limited time under limited terms. The OGL recognized that by creating a way to clearly remix licensed content with open content. Doing this in a way that preserves the rights and permissions of both. While Creative Commons has guidance on how to license only part of your work. It doesn't provide clarity and leaves it up to the author to how this is indicated. Something like ORC can help provide clarity by tailoring the spirit of Creative Commons to the conditions of our hobby and industry. [URL='https://creativecommons.org/faq/#how-do-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-my-material']From the Creative FAQ[/URL] [B][I]The D20 SRD and the D20 Modern SRD[/I][/B] In addition to changes to the OGL 1.0a, we need to press WoTC to release the d20 SRD and the d20 Modern SRD under a CC-BY license. These two works are foundational to many projects both DnD related and non DnD related. Plus doing this will disarm Wizard of many more terms (monsters, spells, etc.) to use for IP bullying and lawfare. [I][B]DriveThruRPG and the VTTs[/B][/I] There is little dispute that Wizard's DnD branded products, the DM's Guild, and licensed VTT modules, form the bulk of the business that DriveThruRPG and VTTs like Roll20, Fantasy Grounds, and Foundry do. Losing access to their platforms would be catastrophic for many publishers and authors including myself. Collectively they are an Achilles heel of our hobby and industry if Wizards uses its economic power to force unwanted changes for these platforms. This is not theoretical either. Aside from the restriction of the now defunct VTT policy proposal. DriveThruRPG posted this on their discord server. [URL='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEg_9Avd6-_iy1YtgLglvrwdttgYXsCvZT2V4l3cmneJZC29lkotyUAjXi762QJ7WvOUFxlCF8nNx-69vbYh7nnvWhz9h2geLLL0g46-w1drUjp0NpurR7izm7OOexC_TrOvUle6W2IqogxtHLbvIq2ViBulF8TSpkwxjPQ5b1UIYJs9bCykvtop8uGFuQ'][IMG]https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEg_9Avd6-_iy1YtgLglvrwdttgYXsCvZT2V4l3cmneJZC29lkotyUAjXi762QJ7WvOUFxlCF8nNx-69vbYh7nnvWhz9h2geLLL0g46-w1drUjp0NpurR7izm7OOexC_TrOvUle6W2IqogxtHLbvIq2ViBulF8TSpkwxjPQ5b1UIYJs9bCykvtop8uGFuQ[/IMG][/URL] Note this sentence So I would like to know what this was in alternative to if Wizards followed through on their initial plans? More importantly, this highlights how much of a vulnerable bottleneck these companies and their marketplace are. There are no easy answers to these questions. But the discussion needs to happen. We need to deal with the fact a single company, WoTC, holds an economic dagger to the hobby's heart. Another issue that walk parallel to the IP issues surrounding the OGL. [HEADING=2][B]Going Forward[/B][/HEADING] I think we are in a midst of an inflection point in the history of the hobby and industry. That the events of the last three weeks will be marked as the beginning of when the hobby and industry charts an independent course from the DnD Brand and the company that owns it. Wizards will still compete but more and more it will be on a level playing field. I know you are tired and want to have fun playing the games we love with people we enjoy playing with. While supporting the creators who help us make this happen. But the peace must be secured or it will be just a ceasefire. So once again. Fight On! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
An Unexpected Victory, Unconditional Surrender, and Unfinished Business.
Top