Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[April 2016] What are you reading?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6884696" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>The Philip K Dick Award is a bit of an odd bird. The Hugos are intended to be a fan award. The Nebulas are the SF Writer's Association award. The PKD Award is, if I understand it properly, just this one sci-fi society giving out an award. While it picked some good works early on, I think its overall picks are a bit hit or miss.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The strategy seems a touch more complicated than that. Their slates in some of the most popular categories were those things that likely would have gotten nominated anyway. And we could read that simply as them either wanting to put themselves in front of the pack and claiming they are leading, or as them saying, "Look, we aren't actually that bad! You like what we like, see?" A step toward trying to legitimize and bleed out the controversy.</p><p></p><p>But, in some of the lower popularity categories, their slates lean away from the recognized leaders, and more to the whitewashing seen last year.</p><p></p><p>The tactic there may be to blunt resistance, being inoffensive where people care, so that they can then win in these other categories.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6884696, member: 177"] The Philip K Dick Award is a bit of an odd bird. The Hugos are intended to be a fan award. The Nebulas are the SF Writer's Association award. The PKD Award is, if I understand it properly, just this one sci-fi society giving out an award. While it picked some good works early on, I think its overall picks are a bit hit or miss. The strategy seems a touch more complicated than that. Their slates in some of the most popular categories were those things that likely would have gotten nominated anyway. And we could read that simply as them either wanting to put themselves in front of the pack and claiming they are leading, or as them saying, "Look, we aren't actually that bad! You like what we like, see?" A step toward trying to legitimize and bleed out the controversy. But, in some of the lower popularity categories, their slates lean away from the recognized leaders, and more to the whitewashing seen last year. The tactic there may be to blunt resistance, being inoffensive where people care, so that they can then win in these other categories. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[April 2016] What are you reading?
Top