Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Cantrip Auto-Scaling - A 5e Critique
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7536581" data-attributes="member: 6795602"><p>Finding a few situational ways that a 1st level spell can be better than a cantrip doesn't make it better than a cantrip. It makes it slightly different. That difference is enough to make such spells better in a few circumstances but not generally better. On every enemy that doesn't have a damage resistance you can avoid (that you are not already avoiding with your cantrip) or a damage vulnerability you can exploit (that you aren't already exploiting with your cantrip) then the cantrip is better. When the cantrip is better in a good majority of the circumstances you can forseeable face then it is objectively better even if it isn't better in every circumstance and situation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here we go again... I am not talking about the spell itself or the spell slot itself. I am talking about a specific spell cast from a specific spell slot. Trying to talk about different abilities than the ability I'm talking about is the reason this discussion has went on so long. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think there is a valid point somewhere. I don't think you are stating it correctly. I think your compounding a valid point here about situational strength with an invalid point about versatility.</p><p></p><p>I would restate the valid point I see here as:</p><p>1. Cantrips are an unlimited baseline ability.</p><p>2. If a specific spell isn't better than a cantrip in any given situation then don't use the spell but use the cantrip</p><p>3. In practice all 1st level spells cast from 1st level slots are going to be better than cantrips when you use them as your not going to use them in situations where a cantrip would be better.</p><p></p><p>Conclusion: Ultimately it doesn't matter if 1st level spells are only situationally better than cantrips because in practice that's all they actually need to be in order to produce better effects than cantrips.</p><p></p><p>I find this both reasonable and compelling. (Note that the point doesn't rely on other spells or the spell being cast from a different spell slot, ie: the argument isn't about versatility but about situational strength). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess it would depend on what you mean by comparing them as if nothing else in the game exists. If it's just code for versatility matters in this discussion then that's not flawed because versatility doesn't matter.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think accusing someone of not arguing in good faith is bigger evidence of someone not arguing in good faith. When you have to defend yourself against strawmen for 200ish posts then it gets a little frustrating. Please don't mistake pointed comments due to frustration as not engaging in the discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have to repeat myself because what I'm saying constantly gets misconstrued, because people make points I agree with as if I don't, because they claim I said something I didn't and then proceed to knock it down. So no, repeating myself is on them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Prove it. Because this is untrue. When someone says something that is relevant I point it out. Even when they kind of stumble over something relevant as you did in this post I point it out. I have done that over this whole thread. I can't help that 95% of the comments on this thread have had to do with things that weren't relevant to my actual claim. Between strawmen and misconstruing my words and outright putting other claims into my mouth, there hasn't been much relevant to that's been stated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 7536581, member: 6795602"] Finding a few situational ways that a 1st level spell can be better than a cantrip doesn't make it better than a cantrip. It makes it slightly different. That difference is enough to make such spells better in a few circumstances but not generally better. On every enemy that doesn't have a damage resistance you can avoid (that you are not already avoiding with your cantrip) or a damage vulnerability you can exploit (that you aren't already exploiting with your cantrip) then the cantrip is better. When the cantrip is better in a good majority of the circumstances you can forseeable face then it is objectively better even if it isn't better in every circumstance and situation. Here we go again... I am not talking about the spell itself or the spell slot itself. I am talking about a specific spell cast from a specific spell slot. Trying to talk about different abilities than the ability I'm talking about is the reason this discussion has went on so long. I think there is a valid point somewhere. I don't think you are stating it correctly. I think your compounding a valid point here about situational strength with an invalid point about versatility. I would restate the valid point I see here as: 1. Cantrips are an unlimited baseline ability. 2. If a specific spell isn't better than a cantrip in any given situation then don't use the spell but use the cantrip 3. In practice all 1st level spells cast from 1st level slots are going to be better than cantrips when you use them as your not going to use them in situations where a cantrip would be better. Conclusion: Ultimately it doesn't matter if 1st level spells are only situationally better than cantrips because in practice that's all they actually need to be in order to produce better effects than cantrips. I find this both reasonable and compelling. (Note that the point doesn't rely on other spells or the spell being cast from a different spell slot, ie: the argument isn't about versatility but about situational strength). I guess it would depend on what you mean by comparing them as if nothing else in the game exists. If it's just code for versatility matters in this discussion then that's not flawed because versatility doesn't matter. I think accusing someone of not arguing in good faith is bigger evidence of someone not arguing in good faith. When you have to defend yourself against strawmen for 200ish posts then it gets a little frustrating. Please don't mistake pointed comments due to frustration as not engaging in the discussion. I have to repeat myself because what I'm saying constantly gets misconstrued, because people make points I agree with as if I don't, because they claim I said something I didn't and then proceed to knock it down. So no, repeating myself is on them. Prove it. Because this is untrue. When someone says something that is relevant I point it out. Even when they kind of stumble over something relevant as you did in this post I point it out. I have done that over this whole thread. I can't help that 95% of the comments on this thread have had to do with things that weren't relevant to my actual claim. Between strawmen and misconstruing my words and outright putting other claims into my mouth, there hasn't been much relevant to that's been stated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Cantrip Auto-Scaling - A 5e Critique
Top