Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Combat] Fighting Styles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris_Nightwing" data-source="post: 5954914" data-attributes="member: 882"><p>Today I thought I'd post about fighting styles - which ones I'd like to see supported by themes, and what those fighting styles should do in play. I'd be interested to hear other ideas, but I'm keeping the focus on non-magical, Fighter-y stuff here. Some inspiration has been gathered from previous editions, and Baldur's Gate II, which did a fine job of offering interesting choices for martial characters.</p><p></p><p><u>Two-Weapon Fighting</u></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">First of all, a decision has to be made about how two-weapon fighting interacts with weapon damage. Either it grants an extra attack, or the secondary weapon has some other effect.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">My preference is an additional attack, which means that for balance purposes, two-handed weapons really ought to deal twice as much damage as one-handed weapons.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The obvious alternative would be granting advantage on a two-weapon attack, but this would become a no-brainer for any damage-centred Rogue. I am struggling to think of a way to include some cost here.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Another option is to go back to penalties for TWF, mitigated by a theme. Again, to avoid numbers, the offhand attack could normally have disadvantage, mitigated by the first feat in this theme.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Finally, there are always numbers. Bonus damage from the offhand weapon, perhaps bonus defence, the sort of stuff we saw in 3E/4E. Fiddly, in my opinion.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If you want to mix together fighting styles with manoeuvres, this would be a good candidate for improved disarming.</li> </ul><p></p><p><u>Two-Handed</u></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Obviously, the damage output of a two-handed weapon depends on your attitude to two-weapon fighting. I do like the simplicity of one-handed weapons dealing 1d#, with two-handed equivalents dealing 2d#.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This is a damage-centred style, but to avoid numbers again we could increase damage dice, or have minima on die rolls, based on Strength for instance - 2d6, but you can't roll lower than your Str mod on either dice.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Again, mixing this with manoeuvres, this is a good candidate for AC-sundering or knockdown.</li> </ul><p></p><p></p><p><u>Sword and Board</u></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Aside from the obvious bonus to AC granted by this style, the Guardian theme was a good starting point, protecting an ally simply and effectively each round.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Perhaps there should be an option to protect yourself too, particularly against ranged attacks.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There is also the possibility of providing a save bonus against bursts and breath weapons, but that might involve numbers.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Any manoeuvres involving pushing are most suitable for this style.</li> </ul><p></p><p><u>Free Hand</u></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This is for flexible combatants, fencers, duelists, that sort of style: a one-handed weapon and nothing more.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">To go with the fencing theme, maybe this should be the defend-yourself theme - though you lack the AC bonus of a shield, maybe you can parry or even counterattack in the way a guardian blocks.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Manoeuvres such as feinting (for advantage next attack) and perhaps tripping seem to fit with the general flamboyance of this style</li> </ul><p></p><p><u>Archery</u></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The most straight forward style really, though I wonder how to improve it. Obviously there is removing the disadvantage penalty for firing whilst you are in melee.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There is no mention of a penalty for firing *into* a melee yet, but that would be another good thing to remove with this theme.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Later in the theme, penalties for opponents using cover could be mitigated, but I'm struggling to think of exciting benefits that don't involve more attacks (which might be acceptable if bows do 1 damage dice).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There aren't many ranged manoeuvres either, though I could conceive of situations in which you might pin an opponent, or distract them with a well-placed arrow that provides an ally of yours with advantage against them in melee.</li> </ul><p></p><p><u>Unarmed</u></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Quite the specialist style, I'm not sure it should be offered out of the gate so as not to tread on the monk - though they may well be available right away.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I imagine this will mostly focus on increasing the damage dice of your unarmed attacks and removing any penalties that might exist.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Grapple is the obviously suitable manoeuvre, though disarm could apply in some contexts.</li> </ul><p></p><p>So, the questions I'm interested in discussing are whether there are further styles you would like to see, whether there are more interesting benefits these styles could provide, and I'm also curious as to whether people want small bonuses, +2 here, +1 there, or if sweeping effects like advantage, die roll minima or 'ignore this penalty' are preferable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris_Nightwing, post: 5954914, member: 882"] Today I thought I'd post about fighting styles - which ones I'd like to see supported by themes, and what those fighting styles should do in play. I'd be interested to hear other ideas, but I'm keeping the focus on non-magical, Fighter-y stuff here. Some inspiration has been gathered from previous editions, and Baldur's Gate II, which did a fine job of offering interesting choices for martial characters. [U]Two-Weapon Fighting[/U] [LIST] [*]First of all, a decision has to be made about how two-weapon fighting interacts with weapon damage. Either it grants an extra attack, or the secondary weapon has some other effect. [*]My preference is an additional attack, which means that for balance purposes, two-handed weapons really ought to deal twice as much damage as one-handed weapons. [*]The obvious alternative would be granting advantage on a two-weapon attack, but this would become a no-brainer for any damage-centred Rogue. I am struggling to think of a way to include some cost here. [*]Another option is to go back to penalties for TWF, mitigated by a theme. Again, to avoid numbers, the offhand attack could normally have disadvantage, mitigated by the first feat in this theme. [*]Finally, there are always numbers. Bonus damage from the offhand weapon, perhaps bonus defence, the sort of stuff we saw in 3E/4E. Fiddly, in my opinion. [*]If you want to mix together fighting styles with manoeuvres, this would be a good candidate for improved disarming. [/LIST] [U]Two-Handed[/U] [LIST] [*]Obviously, the damage output of a two-handed weapon depends on your attitude to two-weapon fighting. I do like the simplicity of one-handed weapons dealing 1d#, with two-handed equivalents dealing 2d#. [*]This is a damage-centred style, but to avoid numbers again we could increase damage dice, or have minima on die rolls, based on Strength for instance - 2d6, but you can't roll lower than your Str mod on either dice. [*]Again, mixing this with manoeuvres, this is a good candidate for AC-sundering or knockdown. [/LIST] [U]Sword and Board[/U] [LIST] [*]Aside from the obvious bonus to AC granted by this style, the Guardian theme was a good starting point, protecting an ally simply and effectively each round. [*]Perhaps there should be an option to protect yourself too, particularly against ranged attacks. [*]There is also the possibility of providing a save bonus against bursts and breath weapons, but that might involve numbers. [*]Any manoeuvres involving pushing are most suitable for this style. [/LIST] [U]Free Hand[/U] [LIST] [*]This is for flexible combatants, fencers, duelists, that sort of style: a one-handed weapon and nothing more. [*]To go with the fencing theme, maybe this should be the defend-yourself theme - though you lack the AC bonus of a shield, maybe you can parry or even counterattack in the way a guardian blocks. [*]Manoeuvres such as feinting (for advantage next attack) and perhaps tripping seem to fit with the general flamboyance of this style [/LIST] [U]Archery[/U] [LIST] [*]The most straight forward style really, though I wonder how to improve it. Obviously there is removing the disadvantage penalty for firing whilst you are in melee. [*]There is no mention of a penalty for firing *into* a melee yet, but that would be another good thing to remove with this theme. [*]Later in the theme, penalties for opponents using cover could be mitigated, but I'm struggling to think of exciting benefits that don't involve more attacks (which might be acceptable if bows do 1 damage dice). [*]There aren't many ranged manoeuvres either, though I could conceive of situations in which you might pin an opponent, or distract them with a well-placed arrow that provides an ally of yours with advantage against them in melee. [/LIST] [U]Unarmed[/U] [LIST] [*]Quite the specialist style, I'm not sure it should be offered out of the gate so as not to tread on the monk - though they may well be available right away. [*]I imagine this will mostly focus on increasing the damage dice of your unarmed attacks and removing any penalties that might exist. [*]Grapple is the obviously suitable manoeuvre, though disarm could apply in some contexts. [/LIST] So, the questions I'm interested in discussing are whether there are further styles you would like to see, whether there are more interesting benefits these styles could provide, and I'm also curious as to whether people want small bonuses, +2 here, +1 there, or if sweeping effects like advantage, die roll minima or 'ignore this penalty' are preferable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Combat] Fighting Styles
Top