Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Combat style/earthwood archer, 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="von jrs" data-source="post: 5034869" data-attributes="member: 86917"><p>that is definitely something to keep in mind.. but ranged threat alone is, i think, disturbing the game balance.</p><p> </p><p>and a Ranger gets animal companion at 4th level, while the earthwood archer gets imroved combat style at 5th level, with that in mind, i do´nt think that the loss of this companion is enough, (i´ts some pretty good bonuses ).. but maybe it is?</p><p> </p><p>And the culminative bonuses at step two seems way to powerful to me, if you look at other classes and their bonuses at their respective levels.</p><p> </p><p>(and as as blackrat said earlier in the thread, talking about the +3 bonus at first step. "Yeah, I think there's always something suspicious when the bonuses are uneven").</p><p> </p><p>I don´nt want to offend any one, i´m glad that you´r taking the time to write me.</p><p></p><p>But is there some one who knows the mechanics of the game well enough, to tell if it would be aprobiate to give this form of combat style as a choice to the normal d&d Ranger, (with the suggested changes, ( or some better changes perhaps?)?)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="von jrs, post: 5034869, member: 86917"] that is definitely something to keep in mind.. but ranged threat alone is, i think, disturbing the game balance. and a Ranger gets animal companion at 4th level, while the earthwood archer gets imroved combat style at 5th level, with that in mind, i do´nt think that the loss of this companion is enough, (i´ts some pretty good bonuses ).. but maybe it is? And the culminative bonuses at step two seems way to powerful to me, if you look at other classes and their bonuses at their respective levels. (and as as blackrat said earlier in the thread, talking about the +3 bonus at first step. "Yeah, I think there's always something suspicious when the bonuses are uneven"). I don´nt want to offend any one, i´m glad that you´r taking the time to write me. But is there some one who knows the mechanics of the game well enough, to tell if it would be aprobiate to give this form of combat style as a choice to the normal d&d Ranger, (with the suggested changes, ( or some better changes perhaps?)?)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Combat style/earthwood archer, 3.5
Top