Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DM Authority
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 8160501" data-attributes="member: 6801845"><p>This came up on another thread, but there's a lot of things going on over there so I thought I'd repost. </p><p></p><p>How do you view DM authority? Some people say that they feel that "DM as ultimate authority" is outdated, but what does that really mean? According to the rules, the DM is the final arbiter of the rules, the guy who makes the final call.</p><p></p><p>From the PHB</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">One player, however, takes on the role of the Dungeon Master (DM), the game’s lead storyteller and referee. </p><p></p><p>From the DMG:</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">A Dungeon Master gets to wear many hats. As the architect of a campaign ... as a referee, the DM interprets the rules and decides when to abide by them and when to change them.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">... </p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">The D&D rules help you and the other players have a good time, but the rules aren’t in charge. You’re the DM, and you are in charge of the game.</p><p></p><p>In games I've run or played in, the DM makes the final call on rules. They come up with the campaign world and broad campaign, decide restrictions and house rules. </p><p></p><p>Gathering feedback is typical and if someone challenges or requests a change the answer can be anywhere from "Yes", "Cool idea, let me think about it", "What does everyone else think?" to "No, but here's what we can do" to "No". Ultimately the DM makes the final decision. The actions of the PCs are up to the player with exceptions like some groups not allowing evil characters, no PVP or of course dominate and similar. In my campaigns PCs can and do have lasting impact through their actions.</p><p></p><p>[SPOILER="Examples of conflicts"]</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Specific game rules: take (random thing that has come up based on text that could be interpreted multiple ways) Heat metal. If cast on armor player says "they are at disadvantage as long as I maintain concentration". DM says "the way I interpret it, the target gets a con save every round to see if they're at disadvantage". Or even the DM banning/modifying the spell. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Player disagreeing on power level: Similar to specific game rules, the player says they're chosen of their god so their god helps out in ways that are not indicated by the rules. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Playable options: player says they're playing a tortle. DM previously said what races are allowed and tortles aren't on the list. Does it matter if the rest of the group is happy with the list the DM came up with?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">World building: player points to a spot on the map and makes up a kingdom and story. DM says that conflicts with previous lore or doesn't fit the campaign such as a highly technologically advanced civilization in a low technology world.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Player wants to play a gunslinger with 6-shooters in a world where guns don't exist. Multi-shot auto-loading hand crossbows are also not a thing (at least at lower levels).</li> </ul><p>Some of these examples come from my personal experience - including a guy who thought he could run so fast that he could create a tornado like The Flash or the guy who wanted to play a half-dragon half-vampire. I had a guy who worshipped Odin who insisted that since Odin "saw all" he could find anyone on any plane of existence despite spells to obscure detection just by calling up his buddy on speed dial. Oh, and the player would just "pop up to have lunch" with Odin, even though he had no way of attuning a fork to that plane and planar travel is explicitly limited.[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p>So for those that say they don't believe in DM as ultimate authority, what does that mean? Conflicts on rules and rulings always come up now and then how do you handle it if the DM doesn't have final say?</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that any style of game is right or wrong, it's just that I have never seen a game in real life where the DM did not have the final say. Which isn't to say that the games aren't collaborative, they are, at least to a degree. But in my experience the DM simply has to be the referee at times.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 8160501, member: 6801845"] This came up on another thread, but there's a lot of things going on over there so I thought I'd repost. How do you view DM authority? Some people say that they feel that "DM as ultimate authority" is outdated, but what does that really mean? According to the rules, the DM is the final arbiter of the rules, the guy who makes the final call. From the PHB [INDENT]One player, however, takes on the role of the Dungeon Master (DM), the game’s lead storyteller and referee. [/INDENT] From the DMG: [INDENT]A Dungeon Master gets to wear many hats. As the architect of a campaign ... as a referee, the DM interprets the rules and decides when to abide by them and when to change them.[/INDENT] [INDENT]... [/INDENT] [INDENT]The D&D rules help you and the other players have a good time, but the rules aren’t in charge. You’re the DM, and you are in charge of the game.[/INDENT] In games I've run or played in, the DM makes the final call on rules. They come up with the campaign world and broad campaign, decide restrictions and house rules. Gathering feedback is typical and if someone challenges or requests a change the answer can be anywhere from "Yes", "Cool idea, let me think about it", "What does everyone else think?" to "No, but here's what we can do" to "No". Ultimately the DM makes the final decision. The actions of the PCs are up to the player with exceptions like some groups not allowing evil characters, no PVP or of course dominate and similar. In my campaigns PCs can and do have lasting impact through their actions. [SPOILER="Examples of conflicts"] [LIST] [*]Specific game rules: take (random thing that has come up based on text that could be interpreted multiple ways) Heat metal. If cast on armor player says "they are at disadvantage as long as I maintain concentration". DM says "the way I interpret it, the target gets a con save every round to see if they're at disadvantage". Or even the DM banning/modifying the spell. [*]Player disagreeing on power level: Similar to specific game rules, the player says they're chosen of their god so their god helps out in ways that are not indicated by the rules. [*]Playable options: player says they're playing a tortle. DM previously said what races are allowed and tortles aren't on the list. Does it matter if the rest of the group is happy with the list the DM came up with? [*]World building: player points to a spot on the map and makes up a kingdom and story. DM says that conflicts with previous lore or doesn't fit the campaign such as a highly technologically advanced civilization in a low technology world. [*]Player wants to play a gunslinger with 6-shooters in a world where guns don't exist. Multi-shot auto-loading hand crossbows are also not a thing (at least at lower levels). [/LIST] Some of these examples come from my personal experience - including a guy who thought he could run so fast that he could create a tornado like The Flash or the guy who wanted to play a half-dragon half-vampire. I had a guy who worshipped Odin who insisted that since Odin "saw all" he could find anyone on any plane of existence despite spells to obscure detection just by calling up his buddy on speed dial. Oh, and the player would just "pop up to have lunch" with Odin, even though he had no way of attuning a fork to that plane and planar travel is explicitly limited.[/SPOILER] So for those that say they don't believe in DM as ultimate authority, what does that mean? Conflicts on rules and rulings always come up now and then how do you handle it if the DM doesn't have final say? I'm not saying that any style of game is right or wrong, it's just that I have never seen a game in real life where the DM did not have the final say. Which isn't to say that the games aren't collaborative, they are, at least to a degree. But in my experience the DM simply has to be the referee at times. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DM Authority
Top