Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs Guild and DriveThruRPG ban AI written works, requires labels for AI generated art
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 9076759" data-attributes="member: 6879661"><p>Ultimately let the market decide. AI art should have to be labeled as such - both images individually and the product labeled on the dust cover as containing AI art/writing.</p><p></p><p>I’d go further and insist that products containing AI art should have a reference with the source program and line descriptors used to produce each piece of are so anyone can reproduce it - like you would if it was a reference in a non/fiction book. [Edit. As I’ve been misunderstood by a later poster] To be clear I’m not saying users can reference the images used. I know they can’t (though AI systems should have this as a goal) I’m saying the path the AI operator used to create the work should be referenced - because this demonstrates their creative input.</p><p></p><p>Customers that don’t want to buy AI art have that choice. If the market wants original art it will pay for original.</p><p></p><p>There are two separate issues here - artists concerned about the creative element of their work being stolen… in which don’t post your work freely accessible on the internet - put it behind walls that can’t be readily accessed by AI systems.</p><p></p><p>Second issue is artists being undercut by AI. That’s a competition element and needs to be looked at the in new ways. Just like digital copies of music and media made us.</p><p></p><p>AI is not going back in the bottle and banning it will just lead to the folks that do getting left behind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSword, post: 9076759, member: 6879661"] Ultimately let the market decide. AI art should have to be labeled as such - both images individually and the product labeled on the dust cover as containing AI art/writing. I’d go further and insist that products containing AI art should have a reference with the source program and line descriptors used to produce each piece of are so anyone can reproduce it - like you would if it was a reference in a non/fiction book. [Edit. As I’ve been misunderstood by a later poster] To be clear I’m not saying users can reference the images used. I know they can’t (though AI systems should have this as a goal) I’m saying the path the AI operator used to create the work should be referenced - because this demonstrates their creative input. Customers that don’t want to buy AI art have that choice. If the market wants original art it will pay for original. There are two separate issues here - artists concerned about the creative element of their work being stolen… in which don’t post your work freely accessible on the internet - put it behind walls that can’t be readily accessed by AI systems. Second issue is artists being undercut by AI. That’s a competition element and needs to be looked at the in new ways. Just like digital copies of music and media made us. AI is not going back in the bottle and banning it will just lead to the folks that do getting left behind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs Guild and DriveThruRPG ban AI written works, requires labels for AI generated art
Top