Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9336731" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>I was responding to a comment made about a shift in frequency after lurking for tens of pages & that has mostly been my level of participation in the thread. However the post I'm quoting is kind of demonstrating the point in this larger discussion where the primary point of contention over hundreds of pages is if it is possible or even reasonable for a GM to ever declare a background feature doesn't work due to circumstances beyond the player's ken even if that's only a sometimes occasion. In modern d&d we've reached a point where there is no line the other side of the gm screen can cross that does not revoke any benefit of the doubt should someone criticize the lines being crossed.</p><p></p><p>I'm going to question where that apology is coming from though by asking what you felt was in question enough to spend so long giving a pass to the other side of the fence long enough to notice that the call for absolute guarantee of success no matter the in game circumstances might be a bit past reasonable in ways that deserve being questioned? That extreme benefit of the doubt being applied unevenly is why <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/do-you-plan-to-adopt-d-d5-5one2024redux.702682/post-9336486" target="_blank">3009</a> happens as described.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9336731, member: 93670"] I was responding to a comment made about a shift in frequency after lurking for tens of pages & that has mostly been my level of participation in the thread. However the post I'm quoting is kind of demonstrating the point in this larger discussion where the primary point of contention over hundreds of pages is if it is possible or even reasonable for a GM to ever declare a background feature doesn't work due to circumstances beyond the player's ken even if that's only a sometimes occasion. In modern d&d we've reached a point where there is no line the other side of the gm screen can cross that does not revoke any benefit of the doubt should someone criticize the lines being crossed. I'm going to question where that apology is coming from though by asking what you felt was in question enough to spend so long giving a pass to the other side of the fence long enough to notice that the call for absolute guarantee of success no matter the in game circumstances might be a bit past reasonable in ways that deserve being questioned? That extreme benefit of the doubt being applied unevenly is why [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/do-you-plan-to-adopt-d-d5-5one2024redux.702682/post-9336486']3009[/URL] happens as described. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
Top