Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DRAGON #360 Art Gallery: Dryad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3900191" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>That's a bit too literal. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> I was using magic in the more general sense, in that it really is more "magical" for a mermaid to exist than for a manatee to be mistaken for a mermaid. In the same way, it's more "magical" for a beautiful tree spirit to exist then for some malformed twig to be mistaken for a beautiful tree spirit.</p><p></p><p>I mean, dryads aren't typically illusion-using tricksy fey. They're more representative of nature than the spirit world.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, all those are very different.</p><p></p><p>Dyads and Nymphs (which dryads are just kind of a class of, in myth) usually represent the true beauty of nature. They're not there to lead people astray, they're there because it's pretty and they're pretty and pretty things go together and are attracted to each other. They represent the fragility of nature, being protected, chased...as well as the sexuality of nature, and the parallels between the untamed world and the young person. Specifically, because they're Greek, they've got more than a little dash of that ol' time misogyny, to boot.</p><p></p><p>Sirens are specific monsters that lure people into danger with songs. Sirens have more in common with Will O' Wisps and Kelpies than dryads and nymphs. They represent the dangerous side of unknown space along with it's attractive side, how we are tempted to cause our own destruction by our interest in this hypnotic effect. They don't really embody any natural forces or natural things, they're just supernatural beasts like anything else, not avatars. </p><p></p><p>Mermaids aren't so much a dangerous temptation as they are a living thing. They're not avatars like the dryads and nymphs, they're not exactly terrorizing monsters like the sirens, they're more just an entry in the catalog of species, an interesting insight into the world of natural history, something exotic and bizarre, like the Bearded Lady, but not something unnatural.</p><p></p><p>Succubi are dangerous, but they're not natural monsters like the sirens, they're otherworldly temptations. They don't use tricks of song or light to lure their prey, and they don't live on some forlorn rocky outcrop, they live right next door and you've known her all your life and she will use you, throw you aside, and damn your soul while she's at it. </p><p></p><p>The roles they fill as Anybodies are quite distinct, and the roles they could fill as Adversaries and Allies should be similarly varied. Though nymphs and dryads could be rolled together and I wouldn't begrudge it much, I think the powers of a dryad could be different enough from (say) and oread to warrant the division in the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, the fact that they are hot-looking women out in the middle of the wilderness where goblins and orcs and snakes and spiders and all sorts of other unpleasant things lurk is THE reason to resist their temptation.</p><p></p><p>Though, again, the dryads and nymphs would have no reason to be trying to tempt themselves. They *are* attractive. They don't try to lure people in, they just happen to do so by virtue of what they are. They'd prefer to be left alone, and they need protection from the aggressive threats out there who don't want to leave them alone.</p><p></p><p>That's the same story told about the wild areas. They are replete with useful things that lure people in just by the virtue of being wild, these wild areas will loose what they have if they are not protected from the aggressive threats out there who want to take what they have.</p><p></p><p>Loving a beautiful fey creature (and even having children with them) is a well-represented theme in myth. If you loved a dryad, you would take care of her tree. If you loved a nymph, you would defend her field. And if you have a child with one or the other, you might have a hero on your hands (or a villain). There really shouldn't be a problem with that potentially occurring for the PC's.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See, this is disappointing. D&D characters should, in part, behave like superstitious weirdos because most of the superstitions from our world are REAL in D&D. In such a case, someone meeting a pretty girl out in the middle of nowhere should be VERY suspicious, because the most likely options are that she's going to kill you, she's going to drive you mad, or she's going to drive you mad and then have your children kill you.</p><p></p><p>Dryads are something of exceptions to the usual rule. And if the core rules aren't going to support that, but are still going to insist on calling it "The Dryad," I'm going to be disappointed at WotC's failure of imagination. </p><p></p><p>If dryads or nymphs aren't particularly dangerous, I can deal, though I'd prefer them to be dangerous AND attractive.</p><p></p><p>You don't need to look like some sort of tree-monster to be dangerous. You can look like a beautiful young woman and kick butt WELL out of proportion to your appearances, and, in fact, probably do. I mean, if a dryad can survive out where orcs and goblins and spiders and serpents lurk, she's definitely tougher than anyone back in the village who isn't an adventurer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It should be noted that I do agree with this sentiment 100%. But I also think that it's important to reflect the origins of these influences. Rangers did COME FROM Aragorn. Aragorn CAME FROM old-school European legendary kingship. D&D should be able to reflect old-school European legendary kingship, and someone who is one of those should be able to travel across the wilderness like Aragorn and be a Ranger.</p><p></p><p>Of course, Drizzit has about as much influence as Aragorn at this point, so they should also wield two weapons in a blinding flurry of steel and skill.</p><p></p><p>Don't just use archetypes. Use what those archetypes *mean*. </p><p></p><p>Dryad doesn't mean "scary woodland tree-monster." Dryad means "natural untamed beauty that is, perhaps, under special protection." Unless 4e is compatible with that idea, it should represent that idea.</p><p></p><p>And if 4e IS incompatible with that idea, I've not only got fears about WotC's imagination-level, I've now got fears that I might need to learn a different game in order to recapture that mythic feel that D&D has been able to capture for me since I realized it could be present in a game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3900191, member: 2067"] That's a bit too literal. ;) I was using magic in the more general sense, in that it really is more "magical" for a mermaid to exist than for a manatee to be mistaken for a mermaid. In the same way, it's more "magical" for a beautiful tree spirit to exist then for some malformed twig to be mistaken for a beautiful tree spirit. I mean, dryads aren't typically illusion-using tricksy fey. They're more representative of nature than the spirit world. Actually, all those are very different. Dyads and Nymphs (which dryads are just kind of a class of, in myth) usually represent the true beauty of nature. They're not there to lead people astray, they're there because it's pretty and they're pretty and pretty things go together and are attracted to each other. They represent the fragility of nature, being protected, chased...as well as the sexuality of nature, and the parallels between the untamed world and the young person. Specifically, because they're Greek, they've got more than a little dash of that ol' time misogyny, to boot. Sirens are specific monsters that lure people into danger with songs. Sirens have more in common with Will O' Wisps and Kelpies than dryads and nymphs. They represent the dangerous side of unknown space along with it's attractive side, how we are tempted to cause our own destruction by our interest in this hypnotic effect. They don't really embody any natural forces or natural things, they're just supernatural beasts like anything else, not avatars. Mermaids aren't so much a dangerous temptation as they are a living thing. They're not avatars like the dryads and nymphs, they're not exactly terrorizing monsters like the sirens, they're more just an entry in the catalog of species, an interesting insight into the world of natural history, something exotic and bizarre, like the Bearded Lady, but not something unnatural. Succubi are dangerous, but they're not natural monsters like the sirens, they're otherworldly temptations. They don't use tricks of song or light to lure their prey, and they don't live on some forlorn rocky outcrop, they live right next door and you've known her all your life and she will use you, throw you aside, and damn your soul while she's at it. The roles they fill as Anybodies are quite distinct, and the roles they could fill as Adversaries and Allies should be similarly varied. Though nymphs and dryads could be rolled together and I wouldn't begrudge it much, I think the powers of a dryad could be different enough from (say) and oread to warrant the division in the game. Actually, the fact that they are hot-looking women out in the middle of the wilderness where goblins and orcs and snakes and spiders and all sorts of other unpleasant things lurk is THE reason to resist their temptation. Though, again, the dryads and nymphs would have no reason to be trying to tempt themselves. They *are* attractive. They don't try to lure people in, they just happen to do so by virtue of what they are. They'd prefer to be left alone, and they need protection from the aggressive threats out there who don't want to leave them alone. That's the same story told about the wild areas. They are replete with useful things that lure people in just by the virtue of being wild, these wild areas will loose what they have if they are not protected from the aggressive threats out there who want to take what they have. Loving a beautiful fey creature (and even having children with them) is a well-represented theme in myth. If you loved a dryad, you would take care of her tree. If you loved a nymph, you would defend her field. And if you have a child with one or the other, you might have a hero on your hands (or a villain). There really shouldn't be a problem with that potentially occurring for the PC's. See, this is disappointing. D&D characters should, in part, behave like superstitious weirdos because most of the superstitions from our world are REAL in D&D. In such a case, someone meeting a pretty girl out in the middle of nowhere should be VERY suspicious, because the most likely options are that she's going to kill you, she's going to drive you mad, or she's going to drive you mad and then have your children kill you. Dryads are something of exceptions to the usual rule. And if the core rules aren't going to support that, but are still going to insist on calling it "The Dryad," I'm going to be disappointed at WotC's failure of imagination. If dryads or nymphs aren't particularly dangerous, I can deal, though I'd prefer them to be dangerous AND attractive. You don't need to look like some sort of tree-monster to be dangerous. You can look like a beautiful young woman and kick butt WELL out of proportion to your appearances, and, in fact, probably do. I mean, if a dryad can survive out where orcs and goblins and spiders and serpents lurk, she's definitely tougher than anyone back in the village who isn't an adventurer. It should be noted that I do agree with this sentiment 100%. But I also think that it's important to reflect the origins of these influences. Rangers did COME FROM Aragorn. Aragorn CAME FROM old-school European legendary kingship. D&D should be able to reflect old-school European legendary kingship, and someone who is one of those should be able to travel across the wilderness like Aragorn and be a Ranger. Of course, Drizzit has about as much influence as Aragorn at this point, so they should also wield two weapons in a blinding flurry of steel and skill. Don't just use archetypes. Use what those archetypes *mean*. Dryad doesn't mean "scary woodland tree-monster." Dryad means "natural untamed beauty that is, perhaps, under special protection." Unless 4e is compatible with that idea, it should represent that idea. And if 4e IS incompatible with that idea, I've not only got fears about WotC's imagination-level, I've now got fears that I might need to learn a different game in order to recapture that mythic feel that D&D has been able to capture for me since I realized it could be present in a game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DRAGON #360 Art Gallery: Dryad
Top