Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
E.N. Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Cooper" data-source="post: 2674005" data-attributes="member: 24255"><p><strong>EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>EN CRITTERS VOLUME 6 -BERK'S WASTELAND</strong></p><p>By Robert Lajoie, Ed LaPrade, Jeffrey LeBoeuf, Bill Salloway, Jim E. Vilandre, and Joshua Courtney</p><p>E.N. Publishing product number ENP-CR6</p><p>60-page PDF, $6.95</p><p></p><p><em>EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland</em> is the latest PDF in this monster-based series. As you might gather from the title, this time the focus is on creatures that live in a large desert area.</p><p></p><p>The cover is a full-color piece by Allen Kerswell, featuring a desert landscape with a half-buried skeleton clutching a glowing amulet. In the background is an approaching humanoid figure, and behind him further in the distance, a dust devil swirls. There's not a whole lot of detail, but the color scheme is nice and I really like the way Allen blended the sky to make it look hazy.</p><p></p><p>For the interior artwork, Allen is joined (once again) by Jeffrey LeBoeuf and Mike McMenemy, who together provide 20 full-color illustrations and the 38 full-color counters in the back. Tammy Lajoie provides the full-color map on page 11. The artwork is very good this time around, with a few simplistic exceptions (like the bombilli/bombillo illustrations on pages 16 and 19) that are nowhere near the higher standards in the rest of the PDF. I particularly liked the fastling on page 30 (nice detail on the wispy hair, and I loved the high-speed blurring effect), the boneswirl on page 20 (cool "snapshot in time" effect), and the desiccated on page 28 (looking particularly foul under the burning sun, although it's a real shame what happened to his genitals). On the down side, the mica cuttlefish on page 42 is missing two arms. Two of the creatures didn't get illustrations, but as explained in the PDF, they look basically like a normal vulture and a normal tumbleweed, so we aren't missing much - and they did get represented in the counter section in the back.</p><p></p><p>The first thing I noticed about <em>EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland</em> is that this time, every creature's entry begins on an even-numbered page. That means that if you print the PDF out on both sides of each sheet of paper and put them in a three-ring binder (as I do), you can open up to any monster's listing and have everything there in full view. (Well, except for the bombilli and bombillo, but that's because their entries took 4 pages - there's not much they could have done about that!) This is a very handy benefit, and I appreciate the extra work the authors put into making it fit on the page that way. Best of all, there was really only one instance where reading through the entry I could sense that "padding" was being added to fill up the page (over half a page of the Sand Hag entry was devoted to an excerpt from a loremaster's journal); the rest all seemed to seamlessly flow to the end of the appropriate page. I hope that this becomes the new standard for the EN Critters PDFs, because it really is a great benefit and helps it stand out above the crowd.</p><p></p><p>Of course, <em>EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland</em> continues with the features that have made this PDF line so successful - the Knowledge tables for each creature, the Notes and Game Balance section explaining how the creatures were designed and how their Challenge Ratings were derived (by comparing the monster in question against monsters from the <em>Monster Manual</em>), and of course the two-sided, full-color counters in the back suitable to be printed out and used on your battle board during play.</p><p></p><p>As for the monster selection, we get the following: 2 aberrations, 1 construct, 1 dragon, 2 elementals, 1 fey, 1 giant, 1 humanoid, 5 magical beasts, 2 monstrous humanoids, 1 outsider, 2 plants, and 2 undead - considering the only standard creature types that go unrepresented are animals, oozes, and vermin, I'd say this is a pretty healthy spread. There are some really interesting monsters in here, as well. Both undead (boneswirls and desiccated) are favorites of mine, the former being a small whirlwind of bone fragments and the latter being a dried-out humanoid husk. The carrion sphinx, with its vulture head, makes a perfectly logical type of desert sphinx and is much more to my liking than the jackal-headed canisphinx, crocodilian crocosphinx, reptilian saurosphinx, or ibis-headed threskisphinx from Wizard of the Coast's recent <em>Sandstorm</em>. I even like the berk's harbinger, which is basically just a souped-up vulture, but the modifications they made to it make it really flavorful. (Its powers are mostly defense-related, making them difficult creatures to hit.) The fastling, while really just a barely-disguised quickling from earlier versions of AD&D, was well thought out, with a logical set of powers and abilities.</p><p></p><p>Of course, not all of the creatures in here are winners. My least favorite of the bunch is the jaklyn; not only is its name practically the phonetic equivalent to "Jacqueline" - not very scary, giving a monster what sounds like a girl's name - but it's basically just a two-headed jackal/hyena hybrid. Nothing says "I couldn't come up with a cool concept for a monster" to me faster than "I know, I'll slap an extra head on a normal creature!"</p><p></p><p>As for the quality of the creature stats, here comes the "unofficial errata" section of the review. I recommend making the following changes to these creatures from <em>EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland</em>: <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">p. 17, <strong>Bombilli:</strong> "Tumble +7" should be "Tumble +6" (2 ranks, +2 Dex, +2 synergy bonus from Jump).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">p. 44, <strong>Sand Hag:</strong> The Organization entry says a covey can be made up of 3 hags of any type, but this is contradicted in the creature's write-up, which states that sand hags don't associate with other types of hag.<br /> <s>[*]p. 47, <strong>Scorpienne, Monstrous Form:</strong> Add "Tumble +3" to the list of skills (+1 Dex, +2 synergy bonus from Jump).<br /> [*]p. 47, <strong>Scorpienne, human Form:</strong> Add "Tumble +3" to the list of skills (+2 Dex, +2 synergy bonus from Jump, -1 armor check penalty).</s> [Edit: I overlooked Tumble being a "trained-only" skill - see comments below for details.]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">p. 50, <strong>Thorn Giant:</strong> Add "Knowledge (nature) +2" to the list of skills (+0 Int, +2 synergy bonus from Survival).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">p. 52, <strong>Vermilion Creeper:</strong> It has 11 HD, yet the Advancement starts at 9 HD and only goes to 24 HD. I suggest changing it to read "12-22 HD (Large), 23-33 HD (Huge)" instead.</li> </ul><p>Wait, that's it? 6 simple mistakes? [Edit: no, only 4.] Out of a total of 22 sets of creature stats? Yeah, that was my initial reaction, too. I really have to compliment the authors of the EN Critters line: they've really turned around the quality of their monster stat blocks from the early days of their initial efforts, to the point where the quality of their latest monster stats are blowing Wizards of the Coast out of the water! Way to go, guys!</p><p></p><p>On the down side, while their monster stats have taken a giant leap forward, the quality of their general proofreading and editing has taken a turn for the worse - the much worse, as a matter of fact. I documented 3 and a half pages of errors while reading through this PDF, and while most of them fall into the "I'm easily confused by punctuation" category, there were still plenty of examples of improper capitalization, word misuse (lead/led, breathe/breath, past time/pastime, morning star/morningstar, borne/born, oasis/oases, quarter staff/quarterstaff), and the misspelling of normal words (judgment, vermilion) and their own made-up names (is it "Keska" like on page 9, or "Kreska" like the map on page 11?). Here's a mere indication of the punctuation problems:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,</p><p></p><p>Do you know what those are? After I typed up my list of errata to send to the author (something I normally do when reviewing a PDF, as they're so easily corrected), I went back and counted - on that string above are the 62 commas that I noticed missing while reading through <em>EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland</em>! It looks like proofreaders Jim E. Vilandre and Johannes Luber have got their work cut out for them.</p><p></p><p>Still, despite the generally poor proofreading job, I can honestly say that most of the errors, while far too numerous for my taste, do not make it difficult to read through the PDF and know what was meant. The PDF comes across looking not as professional as it could be (and hopefully soon will be), but the material is completely understandable, and those with a higher tolerance for poor grammar and punctuation might not even notice all that much. Likewise, I haven't let the poor initial stab at proofreading drop <em>EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland</em> from being my favorite in the EN Critters line to date; the many improvements in this book (over others in the series) stand out far more than the nit-picky errors that I noted while reading through it. With a better initial proofreading job and the weeding out of the few goofy monsters (yes, I'm looking specifically at you, jaklyn!), this might well have gotten a "5 (Excellent)" rating from me. As it is, I'm giving it a very high "4 (Good)," with the proviso that once they fix up the proofreading job (as they have in the past), you can consider this to be a "5." Well done, guys: there's still some room for improvement, but this is easily your best book yet!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Cooper, post: 2674005, member: 24255"] [b]EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland[/b] [b]EN CRITTERS VOLUME 6 -BERK'S WASTELAND[/b] By Robert Lajoie, Ed LaPrade, Jeffrey LeBoeuf, Bill Salloway, Jim E. Vilandre, and Joshua Courtney E.N. Publishing product number ENP-CR6 60-page PDF, $6.95 [i]EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland[/i] is the latest PDF in this monster-based series. As you might gather from the title, this time the focus is on creatures that live in a large desert area. The cover is a full-color piece by Allen Kerswell, featuring a desert landscape with a half-buried skeleton clutching a glowing amulet. In the background is an approaching humanoid figure, and behind him further in the distance, a dust devil swirls. There's not a whole lot of detail, but the color scheme is nice and I really like the way Allen blended the sky to make it look hazy. For the interior artwork, Allen is joined (once again) by Jeffrey LeBoeuf and Mike McMenemy, who together provide 20 full-color illustrations and the 38 full-color counters in the back. Tammy Lajoie provides the full-color map on page 11. The artwork is very good this time around, with a few simplistic exceptions (like the bombilli/bombillo illustrations on pages 16 and 19) that are nowhere near the higher standards in the rest of the PDF. I particularly liked the fastling on page 30 (nice detail on the wispy hair, and I loved the high-speed blurring effect), the boneswirl on page 20 (cool "snapshot in time" effect), and the desiccated on page 28 (looking particularly foul under the burning sun, although it's a real shame what happened to his genitals). On the down side, the mica cuttlefish on page 42 is missing two arms. Two of the creatures didn't get illustrations, but as explained in the PDF, they look basically like a normal vulture and a normal tumbleweed, so we aren't missing much - and they did get represented in the counter section in the back. The first thing I noticed about [i]EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland[/i] is that this time, every creature's entry begins on an even-numbered page. That means that if you print the PDF out on both sides of each sheet of paper and put them in a three-ring binder (as I do), you can open up to any monster's listing and have everything there in full view. (Well, except for the bombilli and bombillo, but that's because their entries took 4 pages - there's not much they could have done about that!) This is a very handy benefit, and I appreciate the extra work the authors put into making it fit on the page that way. Best of all, there was really only one instance where reading through the entry I could sense that "padding" was being added to fill up the page (over half a page of the Sand Hag entry was devoted to an excerpt from a loremaster's journal); the rest all seemed to seamlessly flow to the end of the appropriate page. I hope that this becomes the new standard for the EN Critters PDFs, because it really is a great benefit and helps it stand out above the crowd. Of course, [i]EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland[/i] continues with the features that have made this PDF line so successful - the Knowledge tables for each creature, the Notes and Game Balance section explaining how the creatures were designed and how their Challenge Ratings were derived (by comparing the monster in question against monsters from the [i]Monster Manual[/i]), and of course the two-sided, full-color counters in the back suitable to be printed out and used on your battle board during play. As for the monster selection, we get the following: 2 aberrations, 1 construct, 1 dragon, 2 elementals, 1 fey, 1 giant, 1 humanoid, 5 magical beasts, 2 monstrous humanoids, 1 outsider, 2 plants, and 2 undead - considering the only standard creature types that go unrepresented are animals, oozes, and vermin, I'd say this is a pretty healthy spread. There are some really interesting monsters in here, as well. Both undead (boneswirls and desiccated) are favorites of mine, the former being a small whirlwind of bone fragments and the latter being a dried-out humanoid husk. The carrion sphinx, with its vulture head, makes a perfectly logical type of desert sphinx and is much more to my liking than the jackal-headed canisphinx, crocodilian crocosphinx, reptilian saurosphinx, or ibis-headed threskisphinx from Wizard of the Coast's recent [i]Sandstorm[/i]. I even like the berk's harbinger, which is basically just a souped-up vulture, but the modifications they made to it make it really flavorful. (Its powers are mostly defense-related, making them difficult creatures to hit.) The fastling, while really just a barely-disguised quickling from earlier versions of AD&D, was well thought out, with a logical set of powers and abilities. Of course, not all of the creatures in here are winners. My least favorite of the bunch is the jaklyn; not only is its name practically the phonetic equivalent to "Jacqueline" - not very scary, giving a monster what sounds like a girl's name - but it's basically just a two-headed jackal/hyena hybrid. Nothing says "I couldn't come up with a cool concept for a monster" to me faster than "I know, I'll slap an extra head on a normal creature!" As for the quality of the creature stats, here comes the "unofficial errata" section of the review. I recommend making the following changes to these creatures from [i]EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland[/i]:[list][*]p. 17, [b]Bombilli:[/b] "Tumble +7" should be "Tumble +6" (2 ranks, +2 Dex, +2 synergy bonus from Jump). [*]p. 44, [b]Sand Hag:[/b] The Organization entry says a covey can be made up of 3 hags of any type, but this is contradicted in the creature's write-up, which states that sand hags don't associate with other types of hag. [S][*]p. 47, [b]Scorpienne, Monstrous Form:[/b] Add "Tumble +3" to the list of skills (+1 Dex, +2 synergy bonus from Jump). [*]p. 47, [b]Scorpienne, human Form:[/b] Add "Tumble +3" to the list of skills (+2 Dex, +2 synergy bonus from Jump, -1 armor check penalty).[/S] [Edit: I overlooked Tumble being a "trained-only" skill - see comments below for details.] [*]p. 50, [b]Thorn Giant:[/b] Add "Knowledge (nature) +2" to the list of skills (+0 Int, +2 synergy bonus from Survival). [*]p. 52, [b]Vermilion Creeper:[/b] It has 11 HD, yet the Advancement starts at 9 HD and only goes to 24 HD. I suggest changing it to read "12-22 HD (Large), 23-33 HD (Huge)" instead.[/list]Wait, that's it? 6 simple mistakes? [Edit: no, only 4.] Out of a total of 22 sets of creature stats? Yeah, that was my initial reaction, too. I really have to compliment the authors of the EN Critters line: they've really turned around the quality of their monster stat blocks from the early days of their initial efforts, to the point where the quality of their latest monster stats are blowing Wizards of the Coast out of the water! Way to go, guys! On the down side, while their monster stats have taken a giant leap forward, the quality of their general proofreading and editing has taken a turn for the worse - the much worse, as a matter of fact. I documented 3 and a half pages of errors while reading through this PDF, and while most of them fall into the "I'm easily confused by punctuation" category, there were still plenty of examples of improper capitalization, word misuse (lead/led, breathe/breath, past time/pastime, morning star/morningstar, borne/born, oasis/oases, quarter staff/quarterstaff), and the misspelling of normal words (judgment, vermilion) and their own made-up names (is it "Keska" like on page 9, or "Kreska" like the map on page 11?). Here's a mere indication of the punctuation problems: [INDENT],,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,[/INDENT] Do you know what those are? After I typed up my list of errata to send to the author (something I normally do when reviewing a PDF, as they're so easily corrected), I went back and counted - on that string above are the 62 commas that I noticed missing while reading through [i]EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland[/i]! It looks like proofreaders Jim E. Vilandre and Johannes Luber have got their work cut out for them. Still, despite the generally poor proofreading job, I can honestly say that most of the errors, while far too numerous for my taste, do not make it difficult to read through the PDF and know what was meant. The PDF comes across looking not as professional as it could be (and hopefully soon will be), but the material is completely understandable, and those with a higher tolerance for poor grammar and punctuation might not even notice all that much. Likewise, I haven't let the poor initial stab at proofreading drop [i]EN Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland[/i] from being my favorite in the EN Critters line to date; the many improvements in this book (over others in the series) stand out far more than the nit-picky errors that I noted while reading through it. With a better initial proofreading job and the weeding out of the few goofy monsters (yes, I'm looking specifically at you, jaklyn!), this might well have gotten a "5 (Excellent)" rating from me. As it is, I'm giving it a very high "4 (Good)," with the proviso that once they fix up the proofreading job (as they have in the past), you can consider this to be a "5." Well done, guys: there's still some room for improvement, but this is easily your best book yet! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
E.N. Critters Volume 6 - Berk's Wasteland
Top