Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Eberron] Why do none of the setting-specific races have a dragonmark?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Graf" data-source="post: 2403895" data-attributes="member: 3087"><p>I don't want to touch off a flame war, but the new races are generally quite powerful relative to the PHB races (i.e. much closer to dwarves/humans than half-elves).</p><p>The design change allows PCs to get a bit of a power bump.</p><p></p><p>Also the dragonmarked houses are the primary explanation for why the PHB races are spread across the continent while the "eberron races" are clustered more tightly and are less important. If there was a dragonmarked house of Kalashar then there would be Psions in every city available for hire. And so forth.</p><p>Remember that the existence of the Aberrant dragonmarks touched off a war (and Keith Bakers recent post about The Lords of Madness gives a hint as to why they were seen as being so dangerous).</p><p></p><p> </p><p>A player and I were talking about something similar to this today. He explained that he wants to play someone with "combat skills and who can talk to people". And I explained (he already new this of course but he let me prattle on anyway) that for party balance reasons it doesn't work like that. Generally if you want lots of skill points you can't have best bab/high hitpoints.</p><p>His feeling was "but that means I can't play the character I want to".</p><p>I see this the same way. I'm sure that someone out there wants to play a Warforged, who is a member of a house, with the Dragonmark Heir prestige class, etc. etc.</p><p>3.5 does a good job of forcing people to make choices about their characters. Which is another way of saying there are limits. More flexible than prior editions but they are still striking a balance.</p><p></p><p>If you accept that the point of DnD design is to facilitate an environment where different characters have different abilities and different opportunities to shine then this kind of choice, while irritating to a given player who wants to be useful in many different situations, is in line with their design goals.</p><p>DnD is oriented around a "you need a balanced party of 4 people to finish this mission" type approach.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Graf, post: 2403895, member: 3087"] I don't want to touch off a flame war, but the new races are generally quite powerful relative to the PHB races (i.e. much closer to dwarves/humans than half-elves). The design change allows PCs to get a bit of a power bump. Also the dragonmarked houses are the primary explanation for why the PHB races are spread across the continent while the "eberron races" are clustered more tightly and are less important. If there was a dragonmarked house of Kalashar then there would be Psions in every city available for hire. And so forth. Remember that the existence of the Aberrant dragonmarks touched off a war (and Keith Bakers recent post about The Lords of Madness gives a hint as to why they were seen as being so dangerous). A player and I were talking about something similar to this today. He explained that he wants to play someone with "combat skills and who can talk to people". And I explained (he already new this of course but he let me prattle on anyway) that for party balance reasons it doesn't work like that. Generally if you want lots of skill points you can't have best bab/high hitpoints. His feeling was "but that means I can't play the character I want to". I see this the same way. I'm sure that someone out there wants to play a Warforged, who is a member of a house, with the Dragonmark Heir prestige class, etc. etc. 3.5 does a good job of forcing people to make choices about their characters. Which is another way of saying there are limits. More flexible than prior editions but they are still striking a balance. If you accept that the point of DnD design is to facilitate an environment where different characters have different abilities and different opportunities to shine then this kind of choice, while irritating to a given player who wants to be useful in many different situations, is in line with their design goals. DnD is oriented around a "you need a balanced party of 4 people to finish this mission" type approach. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Eberron] Why do none of the setting-specific races have a dragonmark?
Top