Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing the Bow Mechanics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 217693" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>I'll admit that they're not the best examples. A +1 Holy Shock bow is much more likely than a +4 bow for instance. (Of course, this is yet another reason that archers are vulnerable to sunder. . . .) Similarly, I would expect the melee fighters to have +2 keen frost swords instead of +4 swords.</p><p></p><p>A more serious problem with the examples is that, while archery prestige classes don't really give many bonusses that would change the examples, a good number of melee prestige classes do. 30 strength is quite a low number for a raging, Frenzied Beserker for instance. Similarly, a paladin might very well also be a Templar and have weapon specialization and multiple smites on top of the bonusses that I listed. The fighter could very well be a Weapon master who would have Superior Weapon Focus and Ki damage in addition to the listed abilities.</p><p></p><p>For all their faults, however, I think the examples accurately show the effect of the rules. Archers' attack routines will no longer be comparable to those of greatsword wielding or dual wielding fighters but will be comparable to a fighter wielding a longsword and not using power attack. As you note, it will also offer further incentive for archers to do what they probably do anyway in most campaigns: have +1 bows with lots of abilities (holy, frost shock, flame, etc) rather than +4 bows since the special abilities of the bow would still stack with enhancement bonusses from GMW on the arrows.</p><p></p><p>Ther are also some problems with your assumptions as listed below:</p><p></p><p>-The archer will have a dex as good as the melee fighter's strength. This is unlikely--at least if you're discussing an archer who also makes use of a mighty [+4] composite longbow. Archers usually have to have both decent strength and good dexterity. On the other hand, a melee fighter can get by with a 10 or 12 dex and concentrate all of his stat points (if using a point buy system), magic, and stat increases for level in strength.</p><p></p><p>-The +4 [equivalent] mighty bow and arrows are cheaper than the +4 [equivalent] greatsword. Actually, assuming a similar level of enchantments on both items, the bow and arrows will cost marginally more than the greatsword--even with the assumption of greater magic weapon for the arrows. The +4 [equivalent] enhancements and abilities are equally priced for the bow and the sword. A masterwork mighty bow (up to 1100gp, IIRC), however, is considerably more expensive than a masterwork greatsword (350gp). At high levels, this difference is probably negligable but it still exists and could buy the greatsword wielder a potion of fly or a couple potions of see invisibility.</p><p></p><p>-All high level archers can be assumed to have GMW cast on their arrows. Therefore there is no need for them to buy magic arrows. To some extent this is accurate as this is an extremely effective use of a cleric's 4th level spell or a wizard's 3rd level spell. However there are two problems with this.</p><p></p><p>First, as Rackhir points out, those 50 arrows from one casting of the spell are likely to run out in 10 to 13 rounds of combat (using rapid shot and haste effects). Many adventures feature more than ten rounds of combat per day which means that one casting of GMW will not suffice.</p><p></p><p>Second, it unfairly skews the comparison between melee fighters and archers to assume that every archer has a 3rd or 4th level spell active on his arrows. Greater Magic Weapon could just as easily make the fighter's +1 Flaming Greatsword of Speed a +4 Flaming Greatsword of Speed--it would last for just as long and would probably be good for all combats in the day--not just 10 to 13 rounds of combat. The clerical version could also be an empowered Bull's strength delivering 3 to 7 points of strength to the melee fighter for just about the whole adventure. If a comparison assumes that the archer is buffed but the melee fighter isn't then it is innaccurately skewed in the archer's favor. If you doubt this, try the comparison again but this time assume that the archer doesn't have access to GMW but the melee fighter gets an empowered Bull's Strength cast on him. It won't look the same.</p><p></p><p>The only case in which the assumption of magic arrows (from GMW or other ability) doesn't skew the example is the case of an Arcane Archer since they have an unlimited supply of magical arrows as a class feature. However, an Arcane Archer's attack bonusses would probably look worse than the ones I have listed for three reasons.</p><p>-First, an Arcane Archer's magical arrows don't advance as quickly as GMW does--a 12th level character who's an Arcane Archer wouldn't have +4 arrows.</p><p>-Second, an Arcane Archer has to spend some levels on wizard, bard, or sorceror which reduces their BAB by at least one (often more than that since many take more than one arcane caster level).</p><p>-Third, an Arcane Archer needs to have at least an 11 in int or cha which will reduce their ability to maximize str and dex in a point buy system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 217693, member: 3146"] I'll admit that they're not the best examples. A +1 Holy Shock bow is much more likely than a +4 bow for instance. (Of course, this is yet another reason that archers are vulnerable to sunder. . . .) Similarly, I would expect the melee fighters to have +2 keen frost swords instead of +4 swords. A more serious problem with the examples is that, while archery prestige classes don't really give many bonusses that would change the examples, a good number of melee prestige classes do. 30 strength is quite a low number for a raging, Frenzied Beserker for instance. Similarly, a paladin might very well also be a Templar and have weapon specialization and multiple smites on top of the bonusses that I listed. The fighter could very well be a Weapon master who would have Superior Weapon Focus and Ki damage in addition to the listed abilities. For all their faults, however, I think the examples accurately show the effect of the rules. Archers' attack routines will no longer be comparable to those of greatsword wielding or dual wielding fighters but will be comparable to a fighter wielding a longsword and not using power attack. As you note, it will also offer further incentive for archers to do what they probably do anyway in most campaigns: have +1 bows with lots of abilities (holy, frost shock, flame, etc) rather than +4 bows since the special abilities of the bow would still stack with enhancement bonusses from GMW on the arrows. Ther are also some problems with your assumptions as listed below: -The archer will have a dex as good as the melee fighter's strength. This is unlikely--at least if you're discussing an archer who also makes use of a mighty [+4] composite longbow. Archers usually have to have both decent strength and good dexterity. On the other hand, a melee fighter can get by with a 10 or 12 dex and concentrate all of his stat points (if using a point buy system), magic, and stat increases for level in strength. -The +4 [equivalent] mighty bow and arrows are cheaper than the +4 [equivalent] greatsword. Actually, assuming a similar level of enchantments on both items, the bow and arrows will cost marginally more than the greatsword--even with the assumption of greater magic weapon for the arrows. The +4 [equivalent] enhancements and abilities are equally priced for the bow and the sword. A masterwork mighty bow (up to 1100gp, IIRC), however, is considerably more expensive than a masterwork greatsword (350gp). At high levels, this difference is probably negligable but it still exists and could buy the greatsword wielder a potion of fly or a couple potions of see invisibility. -All high level archers can be assumed to have GMW cast on their arrows. Therefore there is no need for them to buy magic arrows. To some extent this is accurate as this is an extremely effective use of a cleric's 4th level spell or a wizard's 3rd level spell. However there are two problems with this. First, as Rackhir points out, those 50 arrows from one casting of the spell are likely to run out in 10 to 13 rounds of combat (using rapid shot and haste effects). Many adventures feature more than ten rounds of combat per day which means that one casting of GMW will not suffice. Second, it unfairly skews the comparison between melee fighters and archers to assume that every archer has a 3rd or 4th level spell active on his arrows. Greater Magic Weapon could just as easily make the fighter's +1 Flaming Greatsword of Speed a +4 Flaming Greatsword of Speed--it would last for just as long and would probably be good for all combats in the day--not just 10 to 13 rounds of combat. The clerical version could also be an empowered Bull's strength delivering 3 to 7 points of strength to the melee fighter for just about the whole adventure. If a comparison assumes that the archer is buffed but the melee fighter isn't then it is innaccurately skewed in the archer's favor. If you doubt this, try the comparison again but this time assume that the archer doesn't have access to GMW but the melee fighter gets an empowered Bull's Strength cast on him. It won't look the same. The only case in which the assumption of magic arrows (from GMW or other ability) doesn't skew the example is the case of an Arcane Archer since they have an unlimited supply of magical arrows as a class feature. However, an Arcane Archer's attack bonusses would probably look worse than the ones I have listed for three reasons. -First, an Arcane Archer's magical arrows don't advance as quickly as GMW does--a 12th level character who's an Arcane Archer wouldn't have +4 arrows. -Second, an Arcane Archer has to spend some levels on wizard, bard, or sorceror which reduces their BAB by at least one (often more than that since many take more than one arcane caster level). -Third, an Arcane Archer needs to have at least an 11 in int or cha which will reduce their ability to maximize str and dex in a point buy system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing the Bow Mechanics
Top