Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Forked: "Math and Grind" or "Why Rechan is Right" (From: "4e One-trick ponies")
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RyvenCedrylle" data-source="post: 4646353" data-attributes="member: 66726"><p>Forked from: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4643524" target="_blank"> 4e One-trick ponies: Why is it the DM's fault about combat grind? </a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Arial'">There’s a lot of talk on these boards using average damage calculations to determine the speed of a fight. That is, the assumption is made that if your average damage is higher, the fight ends faster. This, as far as I can tell, is not entirely true. </span></p><p></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Arial'">The basic reason for is that damage can be wasted. If I hit a monster that has 3 HP left for 15 HP damage, that 12 HP doesn’t go anywhere else. It simply disappears into the void. In terms of speed of killing multiple monsters, I only did 3 HP worth of elimination, not 15. Why does this matter? It matters because the average damage calculations are exactly that. <strong>Averages.</strong> </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Example:</span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Arial'">There are two opponents, A and B. A has 2 HP, B has 20. I hit each one in consecutive rounds for 1d8 damage each. If I hit A for 7 points and B for 2, I have averaged the 4.5 HP assumed by the damage calculations. However, only 4 of it counts towards the total HP pool of the enemy forces. This does not have the same in-game effect as if I hit A for 2 and B for 7. Here, I did the full 9 HP of elimination to the opposing forces AND averaged my 4.5 HP to boot. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">In short, if your high damage rolls hit opponents with low remaining HP totals, the fight takes longer to actually perform than the mathematics should indicate. With solo monsters, you don’t have this problem as there is no opportunity for wasted damage. This, I believe, is the reason D&D 3E fights seemed to grind less despite the fact that the same powers were spammed more often. You fought fewer enemies at a time and thus had a lesser chance to throw away your good damage rolls.</span></p><p></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Arial'">What can be done about it? Minions seem to be a key answer intuitively but in fact exacerbate the problem as you continue to ‘waste damage’ or at least actions on 1 HP monsters. They speed up play only if they replace a normal monster 1:1 not 4:1. AoE can help this, but only if the little buggers are closed in well. </span></p><p></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Arial'"> A better idea – and one that’s been thrown around in weeks past – is damage flattening. Your 1d8 sword always deals 5 damage. (Or 4, or 4 one round then 5 the next. Whatever) There’s still some wasted damage, but it’s significantly reduced. Now your actual results match the statistical model used by both system designers and back-engineers. If you don’t want to do this by math, the players should act so that strikers always hit high-HP targets and then move on once their opponent is about dead, letting the lower damage folks clean up the stragglers.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RyvenCedrylle, post: 4646353, member: 66726"] Forked from: [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4643524"] 4e One-trick ponies: Why is it the DM's fault about combat grind? [/URL] [FONT=Arial]There’s a lot of talk on these boards using average damage calculations to determine the speed of a fight. That is, the assumption is made that if your average damage is higher, the fight ends faster. This, as far as I can tell, is not entirely true. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]The basic reason for is that damage can be wasted. If I hit a monster that has 3 HP left for 15 HP damage, that 12 HP doesn’t go anywhere else. It simply disappears into the void. In terms of speed of killing multiple monsters, I only did 3 HP worth of elimination, not 15. Why does this matter? It matters because the average damage calculations are exactly that. [B]Averages.[/B] Example:[/FONT] [FONT=Arial]There are two opponents, A and B. A has 2 HP, B has 20. I hit each one in consecutive rounds for 1d8 damage each. If I hit A for 7 points and B for 2, I have averaged the 4.5 HP assumed by the damage calculations. However, only 4 of it counts towards the total HP pool of the enemy forces. This does not have the same in-game effect as if I hit A for 2 and B for 7. Here, I did the full 9 HP of elimination to the opposing forces AND averaged my 4.5 HP to boot. In short, if your high damage rolls hit opponents with low remaining HP totals, the fight takes longer to actually perform than the mathematics should indicate. With solo monsters, you don’t have this problem as there is no opportunity for wasted damage. This, I believe, is the reason D&D 3E fights seemed to grind less despite the fact that the same powers were spammed more often. You fought fewer enemies at a time and thus had a lesser chance to throw away your good damage rolls.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial]What can be done about it? Minions seem to be a key answer intuitively but in fact exacerbate the problem as you continue to ‘waste damage’ or at least actions on 1 HP monsters. They speed up play only if they replace a normal monster 1:1 not 4:1. AoE can help this, but only if the little buggers are closed in well. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial] A better idea – and one that’s been thrown around in weeks past – is damage flattening. Your 1d8 sword always deals 5 damage. (Or 4, or 4 one round then 5 the next. Whatever) There’s still some wasted damage, but it’s significantly reduced. Now your actual results match the statistical model used by both system designers and back-engineers. If you don’t want to do this by math, the players should act so that strikers always hit high-HP targets and then move on once their opponent is about dead, letting the lower damage folks clean up the stragglers.[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Forked: "Math and Grind" or "Why Rechan is Right" (From: "4e One-trick ponies")
Top