Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fortress America: When Gaming and Politics Collide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 5753819" data-attributes="member: 1"><p><span style="font-size: 12px">[align=right]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/fortress_america_box_cover.jpg[/align]This news item is more related to board games than it is to RPGs, but it raises a general gaming point worth discussing. What happens when gaming and politics collide?</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Fantasy Flight Games is creating a new edition of <a href="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_minisite_sec.asp?eidm=190&esem=2" target="_blank">Fortress America</a>, a game originally published in 1986 which pits America against three other nations. It was originally slated to have the following blurb text:</span></p><p> </p><p><em><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: darkorange">"It is the early 21st century. Having suffered a series of devastating terrorist attacks, the U.S. wields a newly developed and horrifyingly destructive weapon technology with desperate fury, lashing out mercilessly at any government suspected of harboring its hidden enemies. Entire nations are erased from the map. The world is stunned by the brutal display. Facing few options, an unlikely coalition of nations joins forces to attempt one final plan: the invasion of America."</span></span></em></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">It appears that many of the company's fans found that text to be inflammatory, and FFG apologised:</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: darkorange">Our initial announcement of Fortress America included flavor text that was interpreted by readers (quite justifiably) as politically inflammatory. That text has been since altered to correctly reflect our game's backstory. Our marketing department misread certain key thematic elements of the game, and took unauthorized dramatic liberties with the text. We apologize for any offense this may have caused.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">And the new blurb text was released; it reads as follows:</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: darkorange"><em>In the 21st century, the United States unveiled a military defense system that completely changed global politics. Through a series of satellites and powerful lasers, the U.S. gained a flawless defense against intercontinental missile attacks. The rest of the world feared that this defensive network might be used to launch an attack, and they united to demand that the U.S. dismantle it. A lengthy diplomatic stalemate gripped the globe. With the world at a crossroads, coalitions of nations were formed unlike any that had ever existed before. A plan was devised to destroy this perceived technological threat through military action. It involved attacking from three directions at once, for the nations of the world knew that every army dreads fighting a war on two fronts... and America was about to face three.</em></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Thanks to <strong>Tabloid Believer</strong> over at Circvs Maximvs.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">IMPORTANT NOTE: EN World usually has a rule against discussion of religion or politics. We're going to see - <em>in this one thread only</em> - if we can relax the rule a little in specifically indicated news threads. We'll be keeping a close eye on this thread. You may discuss politics politely (still no religion) BUT you MAY NOT insult another member or nation. Be nice, and we <em>might</em> just do something like this again. Try to discuss it in terms of political concepts and how they relate to gaming, NOT what you think of any specific country.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 5753819, member: 1"] [SIZE=3][align=right]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/fortress_america_box_cover.jpg[/align]This news item is more related to board games than it is to RPGs, but it raises a general gaming point worth discussing. What happens when gaming and politics collide?[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Fantasy Flight Games is creating a new edition of [URL="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_minisite_sec.asp?eidm=190&esem=2"]Fortress America[/URL], a game originally published in 1986 which pits America against three other nations. It was originally slated to have the following blurb text:[/SIZE] [I][SIZE=3][COLOR=darkorange]"It is the early 21st century. Having suffered a series of devastating terrorist attacks, the U.S. wields a newly developed and horrifyingly destructive weapon technology with desperate fury, lashing out mercilessly at any government suspected of harboring its hidden enemies. Entire nations are erased from the map. The world is stunned by the brutal display. Facing few options, an unlikely coalition of nations joins forces to attempt one final plan: the invasion of America."[/COLOR][/SIZE][/I] [SIZE=3]It appears that many of the company's fans found that text to be inflammatory, and FFG apologised:[/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=darkorange]Our initial announcement of Fortress America included flavor text that was interpreted by readers (quite justifiably) as politically inflammatory. That text has been since altered to correctly reflect our game's backstory. Our marketing department misread certain key thematic elements of the game, and took unauthorized dramatic liberties with the text. We apologize for any offense this may have caused.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=3]And the new blurb text was released; it reads as follows:[/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=darkorange][I]In the 21st century, the United States unveiled a military defense system that completely changed global politics. Through a series of satellites and powerful lasers, the U.S. gained a flawless defense against intercontinental missile attacks. The rest of the world feared that this defensive network might be used to launch an attack, and they united to demand that the U.S. dismantle it. A lengthy diplomatic stalemate gripped the globe. With the world at a crossroads, coalitions of nations were formed unlike any that had ever existed before. A plan was devised to destroy this perceived technological threat through military action. It involved attacking from three directions at once, for the nations of the world knew that every army dreads fighting a war on two fronts... and America was about to face three.[/I][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Thanks to [B]Tabloid Believer[/B] over at Circvs Maximvs.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]IMPORTANT NOTE: EN World usually has a rule against discussion of religion or politics. We're going to see - [I]in this one thread only[/I] - if we can relax the rule a little in specifically indicated news threads. We'll be keeping a close eye on this thread. You may discuss politics politely (still no religion) BUT you MAY NOT insult another member or nation. Be nice, and we [I]might[/I] just do something like this again. Try to discuss it in terms of political concepts and how they relate to gaming, NOT what you think of any specific country.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fortress America: When Gaming and Politics Collide
Top