Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gritty City Watch campaign (PF2 specific companion thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8069377" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Here I aim to kill several birds with one stone.</p><p></p><p>First off, the campaign is supposed to be about morally grey characters. While alignment is generally a harmless nostalgic relic of old D&D editions, it is unsuitable for this kind of campaign. Featuring alignment would only restrict players from role-playing complex humanoids with realistically contradictory aims and goals. It's all to easy to use an alignment of "lawful good" as a shield against temptation, and that would work against the campaign tone. Whether players take bribes or look the other way should depend on story, not preconceived labels. So players are to write "neutral" on their character sheets to encourage them to remain open to all options (that they are comfortable with).</p><p></p><p>That does not mean I'm restricting character build options. Players are still free to create characters able to deal good damage, for instance. That would be a neutral character dealing good damage. They will be informed that all the major churches of the city are considered "neutral", regardless of the actual alignment of their respective deity. I plan to include a selection of mostly neutral deities and some evil. Deities listed as "good" can still be chosen by players; they just lack influence in the city.</p><p></p><p>The second aim regards the core game's strange imbalance between heroes of different alignments. In the RAW game, unless you are a Champion or Cleric that must choose good alignment to comply with class restrictions, there is no reason to not choosing neutral. The reason is this makes you immune to significant damage in the game - many creatures (such as devils and demons) deal evil damage, which neutral heroes are simply immune to! In this campaign, the aligned damage of outsiders damage every creature except those of the same alignment. So the evil damage of a demon would do nothing against evil creatures, and evil creatures only. But all humanoids are neutral, and thus every hero will suffer from evil damage. And they would also suffer good damage from angels, for that matter.</p><p></p><p>Finally note that the rule for aligned damage only changes for outsiders. A hero dealing good damage would still only impact evil creatures. They would deal this extra damage to undead and demons, for instance, but normally not to other humanoids, who generally are all neutral.</p><p></p><p>The intended consequences of all this:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">players are encouraged to choose whatever builds they want without worrying about getting strait-jacketed by alignment</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">no system-sanctioned moral prejudice against non-good faiths</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">players are no longer encouraged to min-max by choosing neutral alignment (now every hero is neutral, and every hero takes evil damage equally)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">dealing good damage can't be used as a crude alignment detector (against your fellow men)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">builds offering alignment damage should retain some of their potency, but not all of it (far fewer evil humanoid opponents)</li> </ul><p></p><p>Obviously, a group of players that aren't completely familiar with each other should probably take a Session 0 to sort out the rough limitations on what kinds of character behavior they can't abide by. That's a topic for another post, though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 8069377, member: 12731"] Here I aim to kill several birds with one stone. First off, the campaign is supposed to be about morally grey characters. While alignment is generally a harmless nostalgic relic of old D&D editions, it is unsuitable for this kind of campaign. Featuring alignment would only restrict players from role-playing complex humanoids with realistically contradictory aims and goals. It's all to easy to use an alignment of "lawful good" as a shield against temptation, and that would work against the campaign tone. Whether players take bribes or look the other way should depend on story, not preconceived labels. So players are to write "neutral" on their character sheets to encourage them to remain open to all options (that they are comfortable with). That does not mean I'm restricting character build options. Players are still free to create characters able to deal good damage, for instance. That would be a neutral character dealing good damage. They will be informed that all the major churches of the city are considered "neutral", regardless of the actual alignment of their respective deity. I plan to include a selection of mostly neutral deities and some evil. Deities listed as "good" can still be chosen by players; they just lack influence in the city. The second aim regards the core game's strange imbalance between heroes of different alignments. In the RAW game, unless you are a Champion or Cleric that must choose good alignment to comply with class restrictions, there is no reason to not choosing neutral. The reason is this makes you immune to significant damage in the game - many creatures (such as devils and demons) deal evil damage, which neutral heroes are simply immune to! In this campaign, the aligned damage of outsiders damage every creature except those of the same alignment. So the evil damage of a demon would do nothing against evil creatures, and evil creatures only. But all humanoids are neutral, and thus every hero will suffer from evil damage. And they would also suffer good damage from angels, for that matter. Finally note that the rule for aligned damage only changes for outsiders. A hero dealing good damage would still only impact evil creatures. They would deal this extra damage to undead and demons, for instance, but normally not to other humanoids, who generally are all neutral. The intended consequences of all this: [LIST] [*]players are encouraged to choose whatever builds they want without worrying about getting strait-jacketed by alignment [*]no system-sanctioned moral prejudice against non-good faiths [*]players are no longer encouraged to min-max by choosing neutral alignment (now every hero is neutral, and every hero takes evil damage equally) [*]dealing good damage can't be used as a crude alignment detector (against your fellow men) [*]builds offering alignment damage should retain some of their potency, but not all of it (far fewer evil humanoid opponents) [/LIST] Obviously, a group of players that aren't completely familiar with each other should probably take a Session 0 to sort out the rough limitations on what kinds of character behavior they can't abide by. That's a topic for another post, though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gritty City Watch campaign (PF2 specific companion thread)
Top