Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Have we potentially seen the end of the OneD&D Playtest?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8891492" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>This has been discussed a bit already.</p><p></p><p>I think if WotC don't change course, they're going to lose a very significant fraction of the 40k+ people who fill in the surveys, because those people are at the more hardcore end of things, as the surveys are quite long and serious.</p><p></p><p>Whether that will matter of them, is another question. I do think it'll bias the results, given WotC appear to have returned to the 70% method, because I think there will be some uniformity to the people you drive away. [USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] was saying I think justifiably that maybe that doesn't matter, because if you stick with 1.1 those people won't play 1D&D anyway, so maybe the people who stick around better represent your core audience? I personally think there's a bit more to it, because I think that, realistically, a bunch of people who play 1D&D won't even hear about this controversy, and they'll be people who have the full spread of playstyles and interests, including those of the people who got driven away by the OGL 1.1 stuff, and those people may well be disappointed with 1D&D's changes. But I could see it either way.</p><p></p><p>I don't think people will vandalize them much, for the same reason, though, because the surveys take like 20 minutes to fill in whether you're thoughtless or thoughtful. There will be some small percentage, I'm sure.</p><p></p><p>If WotC do back down, I think we'll see a significant drop in the number of survey responses for the current packet (which is due in by the 20th), but they may slowly increase over the next few months if WotC behaves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8891492, member: 18"] This has been discussed a bit already. I think if WotC don't change course, they're going to lose a very significant fraction of the 40k+ people who fill in the surveys, because those people are at the more hardcore end of things, as the surveys are quite long and serious. Whether that will matter of them, is another question. I do think it'll bias the results, given WotC appear to have returned to the 70% method, because I think there will be some uniformity to the people you drive away. [USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] was saying I think justifiably that maybe that doesn't matter, because if you stick with 1.1 those people won't play 1D&D anyway, so maybe the people who stick around better represent your core audience? I personally think there's a bit more to it, because I think that, realistically, a bunch of people who play 1D&D won't even hear about this controversy, and they'll be people who have the full spread of playstyles and interests, including those of the people who got driven away by the OGL 1.1 stuff, and those people may well be disappointed with 1D&D's changes. But I could see it either way. I don't think people will vandalize them much, for the same reason, though, because the surveys take like 20 minutes to fill in whether you're thoughtless or thoughtful. There will be some small percentage, I'm sure. If WotC do back down, I think we'll see a significant drop in the number of survey responses for the current packet (which is due in by the 20th), but they may slowly increase over the next few months if WotC behaves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Have we potentially seen the end of the OneD&D Playtest?
Top