Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help Me Make My Skill Challenge Fun
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6657839" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>I'm going to throw some general thoughts out there, some guiding principles and some techniques for you. You can then follow up with whatever questions, clarifications, etc that you might have.</p><p></p><p>First things first. I don't subscribe to the "don't let the players know they're in an SC" at all. In fact I think it is actually a bad idea for what SCs try to accomplish. Lots of conflict resolution systems don't hide their metagame architecture from the players; Dogs in the Vineyard, Fate, Cortex + for example. The adversity has the equivalent of a stress track of a dice rating and once you reach the end of it, the adversity is overcome. Players have rules and means (PC build resources) to get to the end of that track and overcome that adversity. Mechanically, those systems are what 4e's SCs emulate. Put another way, "Successes" is the adversity's Hit Point pool while "Failures" is the players' Hit Point pool. You don't hide the metagame archetecture of combat from players (initiative, action economy, attack rolls, hit points, et al) because it would stunt player agency, inhibit their ability to make informed action declarations, and generally stunt the process of resolution.</p><p></p><p>Same thing applies to noncombat resolution.</p><p></p><p>So what I do is make it as plain as possible to the players. I use the RC rules:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td>Complexity<br /> </td><td>Successes<br /> </td><td>Failures<br /> </td><td>DCs<br /> </td><td>Advantages<br /> </td><td>Secondary Skills<br /> </td></tr><tr><td>1<br /> </td><td>4<br /> </td><td>3<br /> </td><td>4 M<br /> </td><td>-<br /> </td><td>1<br /> </td></tr><tr><td>2<br /> </td><td>6<br /> </td><td>3<br /> </td><td>5 M, 1 H<br /> </td><td>-<br /> </td><td>2<br /> </td></tr><tr><td>3<br /> </td><td>8<br /> </td><td>3<br /> </td><td>6 M, 2 H<br /> </td><td>2<br /> </td><td>3<br /> </td></tr><tr><td>4<br /> </td><td>10<br /> </td><td>3<br /> </td><td>7 M, 3 H<br /> </td><td>4<br /> </td><td>4<br /> </td></tr><tr><td>5<br /> </td><td>12<br /> </td><td>3<br /> </td><td>8 M, 4 H<br /> </td><td>6<br /> </td><td>5<br /> </td></tr></table><p></p><p>Secondary Skills are at the Easy DC and augment a player-specified, subsequent primary check by + 2. On a failure, the GM has a complication that they can deploy against a subsequent primary check (imposing a - 2 to the roll).</p><p></p><p>Advantages are spent to step down a DC (eg from Hard to Medium).</p><p></p><p>Every micro-failure is 1 Healing Surge lost by the player. </p><p></p><p>Every micro-failure of a Group Check is 1 Healing Surge lost by each player</p><p></p><p>A failed Skill Challenge is 2 Healing Surges lost by each player.</p><p></p><p>Pretty simple.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p>One of the problems I see you're running into is that PC team is deferring to a player with a relevant high check to solve a problem. There is an easy answer for this.</p><p></p><p>Consider a Skill Challenge to be that of a story-boarded action scene in comic books. Each moment of relevance of an SC is its own box. That box should typically put pressure onto a specific PC RIGHT NOW. You put that PC in a spot by framing them into a moment of desperation, a hard choice, or by showing them something imminent that will come to pass if they don't seize the moment. They may be able to be aided by a player (via a SS, but the PS will be theirs).</p><p></p><p>Exploration example:</p><p></p><p>GM: Bob (the Fighter), as the vanguard of the group, you're the first to enter the chamber. The massive stone double doors you pushed through resisted but then relented. The lentil over the entrance is cracked and pocked and dust and dislodged pebbles assail you as you step inside. By the magical light imbued in your sword you can see high ceilings held aloft by crumbling pillars. The framing of this room is failing terribly. As your allies begin to filter in behind you, you hear and see one of the primary load-bearing pillars begin to give way. You're certain the ceiling will come with it!</p><p></p><p>Player of Bob the Fighter: I sprint to the pillar and bear hug it to hold it in to place! I shout to my allies: "Hurry and find the exit or we'll be buried alive! I don't know how long I can hold this!"</p><p></p><p>GM: Alright. This is serious business. You're wanting to keep the failing pillar in place and hold up the ceiling while your allies look for eggress, right? I think this calls for using one of my 4 Hard DCs (assuming Complexity 5). </p><p></p><p>* Of note, the GM's Hard DCs are basically like MHRP Doom Pool. When the GM wants to escalate the action, up the stakes, and amp up the tension, they'll use one of their Hard DCs. Likewise, Advantages are basically the community Plot Point pool for the players. </p><p></p><p>Player of Bob the Fighter: That's right! My spirit soars and my muscles bulge! Be it a swarm of monsters or a collapsing ceiling, it is my sworn duty to protect my allies no matter the cost to me! </p><p></p><p>I'm spending one of our Advantages to step down the DC to Medium.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p>The key here is to always keep the action moving in interesting directions. The fiction should ALWAYS change dynamically as a result of any given resolution. Any micro-success in a Skill Challenge needs to be a "Success with (interesting) Complications". Any micro-failure needs to have the PCs "Failing Forward." The fiction must always be propelled forward with exciting, interesting decision-points for the players. Let past results snowball toward climax and only on the cementing success or failure is there going to be 100 % win/loss established. </p><p></p><p>You need to be using genre logic and narrative causality throughout the course of the challenge. Every challenge needs to follow Freytag's dramatic arc: Exposition > Rising Action > Climax > Falling Action > Denouement. At the exposition phase, you need to be having a conversation with your players. Their goals for the challenge need to be clear. The price of failure/the stakes need to be clear. At each action declaration, you need to understand the exact intent of your player so you can come up with dramatically compelling consequences for failure. Consequences that changes the dynamics of the scene and propels things forward but doesn't close it out (unless you're at the final failure). </p><p></p><p>Consider the above situation with Bob. Bob fails his Athletics check? Let us assume it is the 1st or 2nd failure in the dungeon Skill Challenge. We need to fail the group forward. Perhaps Bob holds up the pillar <em>just </em>long enough for his allies to discover the egress from the room. They're all at the edge of the room save Bob on the other side.</p><p></p><p>It is pretty hopeless. Those PCs are going to have to dive out the egress and leave their friend Bob to the cave-in. We've got a Mines of Moria "Fly, you fools (!)" moment where Gandalf (Bob in this case) heroically sacrifices himself. You don't have to have the other PCs make a primary check to dive out of the room with the collapsing ceiling. You can just "say yes." If that is what they do then now we've split the party up. Mayve everyone else pushes on. Maybe Bob has to try to excavate himself out of the other side of the room and then find an alternative route to his allies. Or maybe the PCs try to excavate the rubble and find their friend.</p><p></p><p>Or. Perhaps instead of all of the PCs diving out of the room, maybe on of the PCs has Arcane Gate (or some kind of derivative)! The Wizard spends the Daily power to create a portal to the other side of the room for good old Bob! Bob dives through before the ceiling falls on top of him and everyone is out of the room! Boom, 1 (or 2 perhaps because that is pretty awesome) auto-success for the Skill Challenge and everyone is safely out of the room.</p><p></p><p>Regardless, the action always needs to go forward. It needs to be charged with conflict at every moment. And you need to be putting specific players in spots or giving specific players moments that test their archetype mettle in the crucible fo the resolution mechanics so you can see what happens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6657839, member: 6696971"] I'm going to throw some general thoughts out there, some guiding principles and some techniques for you. You can then follow up with whatever questions, clarifications, etc that you might have. First things first. I don't subscribe to the "don't let the players know they're in an SC" at all. In fact I think it is actually a bad idea for what SCs try to accomplish. Lots of conflict resolution systems don't hide their metagame architecture from the players; Dogs in the Vineyard, Fate, Cortex + for example. The adversity has the equivalent of a stress track of a dice rating and once you reach the end of it, the adversity is overcome. Players have rules and means (PC build resources) to get to the end of that track and overcome that adversity. Mechanically, those systems are what 4e's SCs emulate. Put another way, "Successes" is the adversity's Hit Point pool while "Failures" is the players' Hit Point pool. You don't hide the metagame archetecture of combat from players (initiative, action economy, attack rolls, hit points, et al) because it would stunt player agency, inhibit their ability to make informed action declarations, and generally stunt the process of resolution. Same thing applies to noncombat resolution. So what I do is make it as plain as possible to the players. I use the RC rules: [TABLE="width: 500"] [TR] [TD]Complexity [/TD] [TD]Successes [/TD] [TD]Failures [/TD] [TD]DCs [/TD] [TD]Advantages [/TD] [TD]Secondary Skills [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]1 [/TD] [TD]4 [/TD] [TD]3 [/TD] [TD]4 M [/TD] [TD]- [/TD] [TD]1 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]2 [/TD] [TD]6 [/TD] [TD]3 [/TD] [TD]5 M, 1 H [/TD] [TD]- [/TD] [TD]2 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]3 [/TD] [TD]8 [/TD] [TD]3 [/TD] [TD]6 M, 2 H [/TD] [TD]2 [/TD] [TD]3 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]4 [/TD] [TD]10 [/TD] [TD]3 [/TD] [TD]7 M, 3 H [/TD] [TD]4 [/TD] [TD]4 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]5 [/TD] [TD]12 [/TD] [TD]3 [/TD] [TD]8 M, 4 H [/TD] [TD]6 [/TD] [TD]5 [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Secondary Skills are at the Easy DC and augment a player-specified, subsequent primary check by + 2. On a failure, the GM has a complication that they can deploy against a subsequent primary check (imposing a - 2 to the roll). Advantages are spent to step down a DC (eg from Hard to Medium). Every micro-failure is 1 Healing Surge lost by the player. Every micro-failure of a Group Check is 1 Healing Surge lost by each player A failed Skill Challenge is 2 Healing Surges lost by each player. Pretty simple. [HR][/HR] One of the problems I see you're running into is that PC team is deferring to a player with a relevant high check to solve a problem. There is an easy answer for this. Consider a Skill Challenge to be that of a story-boarded action scene in comic books. Each moment of relevance of an SC is its own box. That box should typically put pressure onto a specific PC RIGHT NOW. You put that PC in a spot by framing them into a moment of desperation, a hard choice, or by showing them something imminent that will come to pass if they don't seize the moment. They may be able to be aided by a player (via a SS, but the PS will be theirs). Exploration example: GM: Bob (the Fighter), as the vanguard of the group, you're the first to enter the chamber. The massive stone double doors you pushed through resisted but then relented. The lentil over the entrance is cracked and pocked and dust and dislodged pebbles assail you as you step inside. By the magical light imbued in your sword you can see high ceilings held aloft by crumbling pillars. The framing of this room is failing terribly. As your allies begin to filter in behind you, you hear and see one of the primary load-bearing pillars begin to give way. You're certain the ceiling will come with it! Player of Bob the Fighter: I sprint to the pillar and bear hug it to hold it in to place! I shout to my allies: "Hurry and find the exit or we'll be buried alive! I don't know how long I can hold this!" GM: Alright. This is serious business. You're wanting to keep the failing pillar in place and hold up the ceiling while your allies look for eggress, right? I think this calls for using one of my 4 Hard DCs (assuming Complexity 5). * Of note, the GM's Hard DCs are basically like MHRP Doom Pool. When the GM wants to escalate the action, up the stakes, and amp up the tension, they'll use one of their Hard DCs. Likewise, Advantages are basically the community Plot Point pool for the players. Player of Bob the Fighter: That's right! My spirit soars and my muscles bulge! Be it a swarm of monsters or a collapsing ceiling, it is my sworn duty to protect my allies no matter the cost to me! I'm spending one of our Advantages to step down the DC to Medium. [HR][/HR] The key here is to always keep the action moving in interesting directions. The fiction should ALWAYS change dynamically as a result of any given resolution. Any micro-success in a Skill Challenge needs to be a "Success with (interesting) Complications". Any micro-failure needs to have the PCs "Failing Forward." The fiction must always be propelled forward with exciting, interesting decision-points for the players. Let past results snowball toward climax and only on the cementing success or failure is there going to be 100 % win/loss established. You need to be using genre logic and narrative causality throughout the course of the challenge. Every challenge needs to follow Freytag's dramatic arc: Exposition > Rising Action > Climax > Falling Action > Denouement. At the exposition phase, you need to be having a conversation with your players. Their goals for the challenge need to be clear. The price of failure/the stakes need to be clear. At each action declaration, you need to understand the exact intent of your player so you can come up with dramatically compelling consequences for failure. Consequences that changes the dynamics of the scene and propels things forward but doesn't close it out (unless you're at the final failure). Consider the above situation with Bob. Bob fails his Athletics check? Let us assume it is the 1st or 2nd failure in the dungeon Skill Challenge. We need to fail the group forward. Perhaps Bob holds up the pillar [I]just [/I]long enough for his allies to discover the egress from the room. They're all at the edge of the room save Bob on the other side. It is pretty hopeless. Those PCs are going to have to dive out the egress and leave their friend Bob to the cave-in. We've got a Mines of Moria "Fly, you fools (!)" moment where Gandalf (Bob in this case) heroically sacrifices himself. You don't have to have the other PCs make a primary check to dive out of the room with the collapsing ceiling. You can just "say yes." If that is what they do then now we've split the party up. Mayve everyone else pushes on. Maybe Bob has to try to excavate himself out of the other side of the room and then find an alternative route to his allies. Or maybe the PCs try to excavate the rubble and find their friend. Or. Perhaps instead of all of the PCs diving out of the room, maybe on of the PCs has Arcane Gate (or some kind of derivative)! The Wizard spends the Daily power to create a portal to the other side of the room for good old Bob! Bob dives through before the ceiling falls on top of him and everyone is out of the room! Boom, 1 (or 2 perhaps because that is pretty awesome) auto-success for the Skill Challenge and everyone is safely out of the room. Regardless, the action always needs to go forward. It needs to be charged with conflict at every moment. And you need to be putting specific players in spots or giving specific players moments that test their archetype mettle in the crucible fo the resolution mechanics so you can see what happens. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help Me Make My Skill Challenge Fun
Top