Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Hot take: Only the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings should be viewed as canonical Middle-Earth books
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 8825164" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>I agree that the whole notion of "canon" is faulty, but will take it a step further: It makes no sense for a world created by a single author. The whole purpose of assigning a "canon" is to have an agreed upon body of lore and stories for a <em>shared universe - </em>that is, a world with no single author, that multiple people make stories in. This, in turn, guides future stories.</p><p></p><p>So it kind of makes sense for Star Wars or Star Trek or Marvel or the Forgotten Realms, not so much Middle-earth.</p><p></p><p>As for <em>The Silmarillion, </em>I'm reminded of that quote from Robert Frost or Mark Twain (can't remember who): "Poets don't finish poems, publishers do." Or some such. In this case, Christopher Tolkien was the publisher/editor/compiler, but not the author. The poetry was all JRR; Christopher just put it together in a cohesive manner for publication. And thank the Ainur he did!</p><p></p><p>And perhaps more importantly: The stories of the Silmarillion were the heart of the "matter of Middle-earth;" they were Tolkien's truest love. To disregard them as "non-canonical" is even more non-sensical than imagining a "canon" for a world created by a single author.</p><p></p><p>I think a more meaningful distinction for Middle-earth is not canon vs non-canon, but Tolkien vs non-Tolkien. In fact, I think that's the only meaningful distinction. There's Tolkien's works--in whatever form or fashion, or state of completion--and then there's everything else, which are <em>adaptations, </em>no more or less. Whether or not one prefers the adaptations is beside the point; they aren't actually Tolkien's work, just "takes" on his work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 8825164, member: 59082"] I agree that the whole notion of "canon" is faulty, but will take it a step further: It makes no sense for a world created by a single author. The whole purpose of assigning a "canon" is to have an agreed upon body of lore and stories for a [I]shared universe - [/I]that is, a world with no single author, that multiple people make stories in. This, in turn, guides future stories. So it kind of makes sense for Star Wars or Star Trek or Marvel or the Forgotten Realms, not so much Middle-earth. As for [I]The Silmarillion, [/I]I'm reminded of that quote from Robert Frost or Mark Twain (can't remember who): "Poets don't finish poems, publishers do." Or some such. In this case, Christopher Tolkien was the publisher/editor/compiler, but not the author. The poetry was all JRR; Christopher just put it together in a cohesive manner for publication. And thank the Ainur he did! And perhaps more importantly: The stories of the Silmarillion were the heart of the "matter of Middle-earth;" they were Tolkien's truest love. To disregard them as "non-canonical" is even more non-sensical than imagining a "canon" for a world created by a single author. I think a more meaningful distinction for Middle-earth is not canon vs non-canon, but Tolkien vs non-Tolkien. In fact, I think that's the only meaningful distinction. There's Tolkien's works--in whatever form or fashion, or state of completion--and then there's everything else, which are [I]adaptations, [/I]no more or less. Whether or not one prefers the adaptations is beside the point; they aren't actually Tolkien's work, just "takes" on his work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Hot take: Only the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings should be viewed as canonical Middle-Earth books
Top