Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
House of the Dragon has me thinking about Succession
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 8798703" data-attributes="member: 72555"><p>There are multiple forms of inheritance.</p><p></p><p>1. Parents own assets jointly. Assets are split roughly evenly between surviving children when they die.</p><p>2. Assets are family held. When head of family dies, new head -- their oldest descendant, and failing that their parent's oldest descendant (and recurse) becomes new head.</p><p></p><p>#1 is what many modern societies use. If you are in an exponentially growing economy where personal productivity is most of your wealth, it works pretty well. But if you are in a situation where assets are your main source of wealth and their utility scales better than linearly, it quickly (in generational time) leads to your assets being split up into smaller and smaller pieces.</p><p></p><p>This apparently happened in a few spots in Europe, where farms sufficient to support families shrunk to tiny near useless plots over a few generations, and wealthy farmers begat starving great grandchildren.</p><p></p><p>#2 attempts to avoid this by concentrating the assets. The family gathers assets, like land or whatever, and these assets are not split up. The head of the family passes down to (usually) an adult, and (usually) one that the previous head of the family feels connected to and the feeling is mutual.</p><p></p><p>2nd children, people who marry into the family, never become the head under this system. They can become <em>regent</em>, caring for the assets while the new head grows up, but they aren't the head.</p><p></p><p>2nd chlidren are cared for -- often, married off to other families, ideally their head. Or, given important positions managing the family assets (but not head). Or, if become priests or monks (acting as a backup head if the existing head dies without issue), or go off to war (seeking fortune). Their needs are funded out of operating expenses, not family capital.</p><p></p><p>A functioning inherited kingdom is going to be following some kind of "one inheritor" pattern, or it will divide apart and fall to either civil strife (due to too many rival power sources) or external threats (due to insufficient cohesion).</p><p></p><p>If merely marrying into a family was enough to Ursurp the assets, then people who are old allies of the family (often relatives) will object quite strongly. They want people who grew up with them, their cousins, whose family legend is part of their family legend, to be the head. And nobody holds a kingdom without that kind of support and legitimacy.</p><p></p><p>The rules of inheritance also have to be clear if you don't want constant strife all of the time whenever there is turnover.</p><p></p><p>Now, if you want fun, read up on English succession. There where rules, but regularly the rules where changed. Lots of blood. The king ruled with the consent of the nobles and the commons; the king had to as the commons to get tax revenue. Often the king and commons fought wars against the other!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NotAYakk, post: 8798703, member: 72555"] There are multiple forms of inheritance. 1. Parents own assets jointly. Assets are split roughly evenly between surviving children when they die. 2. Assets are family held. When head of family dies, new head -- their oldest descendant, and failing that their parent's oldest descendant (and recurse) becomes new head. #1 is what many modern societies use. If you are in an exponentially growing economy where personal productivity is most of your wealth, it works pretty well. But if you are in a situation where assets are your main source of wealth and their utility scales better than linearly, it quickly (in generational time) leads to your assets being split up into smaller and smaller pieces. This apparently happened in a few spots in Europe, where farms sufficient to support families shrunk to tiny near useless plots over a few generations, and wealthy farmers begat starving great grandchildren. #2 attempts to avoid this by concentrating the assets. The family gathers assets, like land or whatever, and these assets are not split up. The head of the family passes down to (usually) an adult, and (usually) one that the previous head of the family feels connected to and the feeling is mutual. 2nd children, people who marry into the family, never become the head under this system. They can become [I]regent[/I], caring for the assets while the new head grows up, but they aren't the head. 2nd chlidren are cared for -- often, married off to other families, ideally their head. Or, given important positions managing the family assets (but not head). Or, if become priests or monks (acting as a backup head if the existing head dies without issue), or go off to war (seeking fortune). Their needs are funded out of operating expenses, not family capital. A functioning inherited kingdom is going to be following some kind of "one inheritor" pattern, or it will divide apart and fall to either civil strife (due to too many rival power sources) or external threats (due to insufficient cohesion). If merely marrying into a family was enough to Ursurp the assets, then people who are old allies of the family (often relatives) will object quite strongly. They want people who grew up with them, their cousins, whose family legend is part of their family legend, to be the head. And nobody holds a kingdom without that kind of support and legitimacy. The rules of inheritance also have to be clear if you don't want constant strife all of the time whenever there is turnover. Now, if you want fun, read up on English succession. There where rules, but regularly the rules where changed. Lots of blood. The king ruled with the consent of the nobles and the commons; the king had to as the commons to get tax revenue. Often the king and commons fought wars against the other! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
House of the Dragon has me thinking about Succession
Top