Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hypothetical Direction Shift For 1D&D/6E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jer" data-source="post: 8921929" data-attributes="member: 19857"><p>I don't know actually.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately I think Wizards gets more out of DM's Guild than the more open publishing model. Not only do they get a cut, they also have more control over what gets published there. (In fact in some ways the leaked info about the 1.1 OGL made me think they were trying to turn all OGL publishing into a modified version of DM's Guild). And if they open up access to DDB or their VTT it's going to be through a DM's Guild like framework instead of just an open publishing framework - if only for technical reasons because they're going to be the publishers of that material on their platforms.</p><p></p><p>In my opinion releasing the 5.1 SRD under CC was a calculated move to stop the bleeding. I suspect that someone realized that ownership of the game rules for their plans was ultimately less important than ownership of the brand and the platforms they're building. Or (and this is what I strongly suspect) there was someone making that case all along and once Wizards were pushed into a corner by leaks and bad press, that solution was the only one they had to work with.</p><p></p><p>But I will say that regardless of Wizards <em>intent</em> of opening up the SRD to CC licensing, it's upshot can only be to encourage people to keep making product compatible with their game. So long as they keep their vision compatible with the rules they've released into the commons, of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jer, post: 8921929, member: 19857"] I don't know actually. Ultimately I think Wizards gets more out of DM's Guild than the more open publishing model. Not only do they get a cut, they also have more control over what gets published there. (In fact in some ways the leaked info about the 1.1 OGL made me think they were trying to turn all OGL publishing into a modified version of DM's Guild). And if they open up access to DDB or their VTT it's going to be through a DM's Guild like framework instead of just an open publishing framework - if only for technical reasons because they're going to be the publishers of that material on their platforms. In my opinion releasing the 5.1 SRD under CC was a calculated move to stop the bleeding. I suspect that someone realized that ownership of the game rules for their plans was ultimately less important than ownership of the brand and the platforms they're building. Or (and this is what I strongly suspect) there was someone making that case all along and once Wizards were pushed into a corner by leaks and bad press, that solution was the only one they had to work with. But I will say that regardless of Wizards [I]intent[/I] of opening up the SRD to CC licensing, it's upshot can only be to encourage people to keep making product compatible with their game. So long as they keep their vision compatible with the rules they've released into the commons, of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hypothetical Direction Shift For 1D&D/6E
Top