Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Interesting Ryan Dancey comment on "lite" RPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 2390230" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>And of course the primary activity of <em>Castles & Crusades</em> fans is to be not Pro-C&C, but anti-3e. In other words, they crop up and throw out their two cents about how the game "should be." Since the intro to that game's player's handbook contains some of this derogatory language about the "current edition," it's clear that C&C's creators feel that bashing 3e is necessary to sell C&C. So it's not surprising that its supporters adopt this stance. Then they cite, as a source, Gary Gygax, who is on record as saying that 3e is not the game "he invented," and that it lacks the "elegance" of his creation. Mr. Gygax is entitled to his opinion, and certainly the first part of the statement is true (that 3e is not the game Gary invented anymore).</p><p></p><p>So the C&C proselytizers show up, screaming about how C&C is "better" than 3e, and even make statements like "rules-heavy games are intended to appeal to children. IME, Real Gamers (TM) like deep-immersion storytelling and only need a minimal amount of rules."</p><p></p><p>I could easily counter that with the following statement: if you think the D&D rules are too complicated, you have a bad memory and/or you can't do math. However, that is obviously just being pejorative and childish. Personally, I don't need a game system to tell me how to roleplay. What I would like it to do is provide an appropriate conflict-resolution system for the situations that arise. Ideally, that resolution system will provide logical, believable, and consistent rulings. Let me repharse that: the SYSTEM (if correctly followed) will provide logical and consistent rulings. Obviously, some situations are going to be "outside" the system. But ideally, that should not be the case the majority of the time. If you're constantly encountering a situation the specifics of which are not covered by the system, you either make up a rule that becomes part of your game (adding another rule to your game) or you handwave it differently every time and your game isn't consistent. If you have a very good memory and can make up a rule for every situation that arises, and recall that rule the next time the same situation arises, you're a walking rulebook...or a professional game designer.</p><p></p><p>Gygax, for the record, may very well be one of the few people in this latter category. By contrast, most DMs, despite their opinion of themselves, are not.</p><p></p><p>Can't we as gamers just accept that some people prefer "rules-heavier" and that others prefer "rules-lighter" without applying value judgements?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess not.</p><p></p><p>Is a complex social contract that produces cooperative storytelling a game? Or is it interactive theater?</p><p></p><p>I would argue that a good DM and their, presumably, intelligent players learn the rules and don't have to keep looking things up. This DM ad-hoccing can be accomplished without a new game system. Of course, that wouldn't give people any incentive to buy books from Troll Lord Games. Seriously, other than its pseudo-THAC0 skill system and its very elegant saving throw system (which I hope D&D adopts), what does C&C ADD to the d20 experience?</p><p></p><p>Just curious.</p><p></p><p>EDITED: Ace, that would be the text I just quoted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 2390230, member: 32164"] And of course the primary activity of [i]Castles & Crusades[/i] fans is to be not Pro-C&C, but anti-3e. In other words, they crop up and throw out their two cents about how the game "should be." Since the intro to that game's player's handbook contains some of this derogatory language about the "current edition," it's clear that C&C's creators feel that bashing 3e is necessary to sell C&C. So it's not surprising that its supporters adopt this stance. Then they cite, as a source, Gary Gygax, who is on record as saying that 3e is not the game "he invented," and that it lacks the "elegance" of his creation. Mr. Gygax is entitled to his opinion, and certainly the first part of the statement is true (that 3e is not the game Gary invented anymore). So the C&C proselytizers show up, screaming about how C&C is "better" than 3e, and even make statements like "rules-heavy games are intended to appeal to children. IME, Real Gamers (TM) like deep-immersion storytelling and only need a minimal amount of rules." I could easily counter that with the following statement: if you think the D&D rules are too complicated, you have a bad memory and/or you can't do math. However, that is obviously just being pejorative and childish. Personally, I don't need a game system to tell me how to roleplay. What I would like it to do is provide an appropriate conflict-resolution system for the situations that arise. Ideally, that resolution system will provide logical, believable, and consistent rulings. Let me repharse that: the SYSTEM (if correctly followed) will provide logical and consistent rulings. Obviously, some situations are going to be "outside" the system. But ideally, that should not be the case the majority of the time. If you're constantly encountering a situation the specifics of which are not covered by the system, you either make up a rule that becomes part of your game (adding another rule to your game) or you handwave it differently every time and your game isn't consistent. If you have a very good memory and can make up a rule for every situation that arises, and recall that rule the next time the same situation arises, you're a walking rulebook...or a professional game designer. Gygax, for the record, may very well be one of the few people in this latter category. By contrast, most DMs, despite their opinion of themselves, are not. Can't we as gamers just accept that some people prefer "rules-heavier" and that others prefer "rules-lighter" without applying value judgements? I guess not. Is a complex social contract that produces cooperative storytelling a game? Or is it interactive theater? I would argue that a good DM and their, presumably, intelligent players learn the rules and don't have to keep looking things up. This DM ad-hoccing can be accomplished without a new game system. Of course, that wouldn't give people any incentive to buy books from Troll Lord Games. Seriously, other than its pseudo-THAC0 skill system and its very elegant saving throw system (which I hope D&D adopts), what does C&C ADD to the d20 experience? Just curious. EDITED: Ace, that would be the text I just quoted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Interesting Ryan Dancey comment on "lite" RPGs
Top